Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Dilipkumar (March 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, SaranyaRethas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, SaranyaRethas. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Nelson Dilipkumar, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 09:53, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Dilipkumar (March 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:36, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Dilipkumar (March 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Dilipkumar (March 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
L293D () 13:28, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Nelson Dilipkumar has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nelson Dilipkumar. Thanks! Worldbruce (talk) 16:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Nelson Dilipkumar has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nelson Dilipkumar. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Dilipkumar (March 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Dilipkumar (March 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft articles edit

Please don't link to draft articles from main articles. Articles in a draft space are there for a reason, they don't meet Wikipedia's standards. You've gotten quite a few messages about this article and the need to improve it and those are still completely valid, especially the part about any COI or paid editing declarations that are needed. Ravensfire (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Article sources edit

Please take some time to read over the pages on Reliable Sources and especially Identifying Reliable Sources. Wikipedia pages aren't acceptable sources for other Wikipedia page, and you need to stop link to download sites. Wikipedia respects copyright and takes violations seriously. If need be, I'll request the download sites you persist in adding to the spam black list. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 20:52, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Dilipkumar (February 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 21:45, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply