created pages

edit

Proposed deletion of Vaishnav Tej panja

edit
 

The article Vaishnav Tej panja has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 23:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Before any further action

edit

If you have filed any complaints against me, then I am not afraid as I have protected Wikipedia policies. You first need to see your flaws:

  • Your reason for report against me is that I am not providing reasons. Actually it's the opposite, you were the one who was constantly edit warring despite my explanations in the review box.
  • Reverted my edits which were sourced with WP: Secondary sources
  • Reverted wording which was incorrect (Some of the earliest..........First read properly, Mahābhārata, Puranas are not the earliest
  • You have added chunks of unsourced content and when given time, you were the one who didn't bother to add sources, see WP:RS
  • Your Ganga image have no proof that it is in Public Domain or CCO, thus a copyright right violation .💠245CMR💠.👥📜 14:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

May I rely upon your opinion on the wholesale removal of large portions of this article by user Chariotrider555? The following link will take you to the the relevant discussion.

You are risking a block for edit warring, due to Ganga in Hinduism

edit

Hello Saraffakarsh. Please see the complaint about you at WP:AN3. Since both you and the other party have reverted way past WP:3RR it seems likely that both of you will be blocked for edit warring. There may still be time for you to respond at WP:AN3. You should promise to make no more edits at Ganga in Hinduism unless you get a prior consensus on the talk page. This might be enough to avoid a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Opinion on a guy called Praveen Mohan?

edit

Since you're a archeologist or something like that so what is your opinion on a guy called Praveen Mohan he seems like an conspiracy theorist or an astronomical theorist according to history channel he Has made unlogical claims that ancient hindu technology is said to be brought by some alien species 950CMR (talk) 14:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

950CMR (talk) for history on hinduism we rely upon vedas, upanishads, Epics, etc..., We have some references, there are many preachers, teachers, guru's etc.., to strongly support the ancient history. As Wikipedia is concerned it needs reference. As Society is concerned it needs direct or indirect references. But Praveen Mohan needs strong reference to prove what he was stating, Still the history remains mystery, So i dont support much of his theories. As per Aliens, if they have very advanced advanced and more advanced technology, the earth would have been destroyed or we would be slaves.

Edit warring at Ganga in Hinduism

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 16:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Moola Rama moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Moola Rama, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). It also needs to be completely rewritten to comply with Wikipedia policies and quality standards. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Saraffakarsh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Attalu Kodallu moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Attalu Kodallu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Attalu Kodallu (April 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moola Rama (April 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GoingBatty (talk) 04:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Attalu Kodallu (April 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Attalu Kodallu (May 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moola Rama (May 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sakshi Ranga Rao, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Saraffakarsh/sandbox

edit

  Hello, Saraffakarsh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Saraffakarsh/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Moola Rama

edit

  Hello, Saraffakarsh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moola Rama, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Attalu Kodallu

edit

  Hello, Saraffakarsh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Attalu Kodallu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Attalu Kodallu

edit
 

Hello, Saraffakarsh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Attalu Kodallu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Moola Rama

edit
 

Hello, Saraffakarsh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moola Rama".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Attalu kodallu

edit

Attalu kodallu is a Old Telugu Movie, Starred by Krishna Ghattamaneni, Vanisri, Suryakantam, Ravi kondalarao, Hemalatha, Chandramohan, Nagabhushanam, Allu Ramalingayya, Raja babu. Directed by P. Chandrashekara Reddy in 1971.[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fevFoczYYDE&ab_channel=IndianVideoGuru Saraffakarsh (talk) 20:52, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ami Thumi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Raja Babu, Krishna Kumari and Chalam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply