SafariKid2

November 2018

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Larry Hockett (Talk) 21:40, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

I think I'll accept your advice. Also, I'm sorry for accidentally listing The Adventures of Timmy the Tooth as a Playhouse Disney show on purpose. But I forgot what else I added to the list of programs broadcast by Playhouse Disney by mistake. SafariKid2 23:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

SafariKid2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SafariKid2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

1. Numbered list item

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Disney Junior. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. FYI, none of the shows you mentioned in the article aired on the channel. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Alright, I'll stop. But they're not unconstructive. They're just... poorly written. And according to where I got the sources for the lists of programs broadcast by [Playhouse Disney] and [Disney Junior], these shows were thought by the staff at Character Wiki to be aired on them in the USA (The Playhouse Disney page mentions Sesame Street, Dumbo's Circus, Rosie and Jim, Tots TV, The Raggy Dolls (which is also mentioned on the Disney Junior page), Classic Cartoons (which apparently is short for Walt Disney Cartoon Classics), 64 Zoo Lane, VeggieTales, Theodore Tugboat, Dog and Duck, Hilltop Hospital, Mopatop's Shop, Play with Me Sesame, Jim Henson's Muppet Babies, The Animal Shelf, The Big Garage, Playbox, The Wombles, and Pocket Dragon Adventures, while the Disney Junior page mentions Disney Junior Latin America's The Garden of Clarilu, as well as Adventures in Wonderland, Bear in the Big Blue House, the original long-form show of Bunnytown, Chip 'n Dale: Rescue Rangers, Disney's Adventures of the Gummi Bears, The Raggy Dolls, My Friends Tigger & Pooh (All 7 of which were also mentioned on the Playhouse Disney page, though the latter did rerun on Disney Junior from 2016-2017 unlike the former 6, with the latter of said former 6 not airing on Disney Junior, period), Mickey Mouse Works, Animal Mechanicals, Chloe's Closet, Dibo the Gift Dragon, In the Night Garden, Little Charley Bear, MacDonald's Farm, Noddy's Toyland Adventures, Postman Pat, Team Umizoomi, Wiggly Park, WordWorld and a show "probably" made up by the Character Wiki staff called Shapes, which, strangely enough, has a badger named Badger as the host), when in reality, they didn't, even though some of the non-Disney Junior shows, namely Animal Mechanicals, Chloe's Closet, Dibo the Gift Dragon, In the Night Garden and WordWorld, did air on the international Disney Junior channels. There are a lot of more non-Playhouse Disney and non-Disney Junior shows on the respective pages, but I'm not even going to have time to mention them, so maybe you can click the above links to see the pages for yourself.

@SafariKid2:, Wikia is not a reliable source. I'd suggest you brush up on WP:CITE a little bit. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:05, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Sorry... But at least Timmy the Tooth airing in syndication during January 1995 is constructive. SafariKid2 23:29, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at The Adventures of Timmy the Tooth. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with blocks or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. FYI, do not use gibberish in articles either. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Well, The Adventures of Timmy the Tooth airing from January 16 to January 31, 1995 in syndication is technically not a hoax, also, I'm trying not to use gibberish either, but I'll stop if that's what you want me to do, so I don't get myself blocked. But at least mentioning all the antelope at Denver Zoo was constructive. SafariKid2 05:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia.  Swarm  {talk}  09:59, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

??? Are you saying I have to clear everything I did in my Sandbox!?! SafariKid2 10:17, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

April 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits, as you've been making on List of programs broadcast by Nick Jr.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SafariKid2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It was slightly wrong to block me because, even though they were unconstructive edits, they were just an accident.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Swarm– ^{Sting · Hive} 🐝🐝🐝 13:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Um... First of all, it was just a late April Fools joke. Sorry. Secondly, I don't wanna get blocked again. SafariKid2 12:32, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denver Museum of Nature and Science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SafariKid2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry for being a vandal and I'll never do it again. SafariKid2 (talk) 16:36, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SafariKid2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Well, fine! If you're not gonna unblock me, terminate me instead! >:( SafariKid2 (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Talk page access terminated. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am a big jerk who vandalizes stuff and hates everything! Terminate me! SafariKid2 (talk) 17:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Wow...

I didn't know I was such a jerk back then, not to mention I've been banned from here since the pandemic started. I just hope my account loses its permanent block (and will be able to access my own talk page again) someday, just as long as I've changed my ways. 2601:280:CA7F:9490:B5CB:3AA2:ED7A:1296 (talk) 22:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

How, though? I have no idea. 2601:280:CA7F:9490:3C26:39E2:59DF:1294 (talk) 23:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Oh well. I probably won't have my account unblocked anytime soon anyways. So yeah. 2601:280:CA7F:9490:3CE6:D37:D74F:5477 (talk) 19:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)