Welcome!

edit

Hello, Rakhi Das, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 09:50, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jeet (actor) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jeet (actor) was changed by Rakhi Das (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862878 on 2017-12-30T04:30:31+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swastika Dutta (January 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1997kB was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
1997kB 05:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Rakhi Das, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ─ 1997kB 05:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swastika Dutta (January 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swastika Dutta (January 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 08:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swastika Dutta (January 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 12:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swastika Dutta (January 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 13:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Swastika Dutta

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Swastika Dutta, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 18:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Swastika Dutta

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Swastika Dutta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dial911 (talk) 18:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Swastika Dutta for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swastika Dutta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swastika Dutta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MT TrainTalk 12:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I improve my article every day with real sources.. Please check the reference and change your decisions. Am too much upset to Wikipedia why they don't accept real person biography with real sources.. Please check this and make your decision. Rakhi (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

You may wish to review and contribute to the deletion discussion, linked to in the article. Please understand that not every person or actor/actress merits an article here. Please review WP:NACTOR, the notability guidelines, as well as WP:RS, about what proper sources are. 331dot (talk) 12:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Rakhi Das. You have new messages at 331dot's talk page.
Message added 13:02, 28 February 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

331dot (talk) 13:02, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I made the edit every time. And make improvements with real able sources. Wikipedia contributer add this for deletion. Why they doesn't check the changes..? Please sir am requesting you help me create this article and remove this deletion log. Rakhi (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have nothing to add that I haven't said already. I've told you how you can proceed. 331dot (talk) 14:42, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Rakhi Das. You have new messages at Mark the train's talk page.
Message added 20:13, 28-2-2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

As a new user, you shouldn't be straightaway jumping into article creations without knowing the numerous policies that need to be adhered to. As a start, read this guideline on sourcing and WP:N for notability requirements. Why not concentrate on making quality edits to already existing articles, learn from senior editors and start creating articles a few months down the line when you're familiar with all policies. This is going to be my last reply to you. Collective editors will decide the outcome on the article you are so keen to save. MT TrainTalk 16:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit

{{unblock|Am sorry sir if I make disturbance on Wikipedia. But the reason you choose for block me that's not true. I don't know who is the "love Sourav". You can check all my details. If you feel that am not that victim you claim on me. Though I request you to unblock me and make me contribute on your Wikipedia. If you doesn't "Unblock" then I have nothing to do.. Please sir check again and if you feel that am not the victim then unblock me..}}Rakhi (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bhojo Gobindo moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Bhojo Gobindo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --- Possibly (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bhojo Gobindo

edit
 

Hello, Rakhi Das. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhojo Gobindo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply