Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard J. Stern (June 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Path slopu was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
PATH SLOPU 16:31, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Racheleo97! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PATH SLOPU 16:31, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oppenstein Brothers (June 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lapablo (talk) 20:24, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oppenstein Brothers (June 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 20:50, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard J. Stern has been accepted

edit
 
Richard J. Stern, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

References and punctuation

edit

Hello and than you for your edits! I have a small tip for your articles: references always follow immediately after the the punctuation.[1] Hope this helps.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Racheleo97! Thank you for your contributions. I am ThatMontrealIP and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Courtney Turner (Atchison, KS) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Courtney Turner (Atchison, KS) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Turner (Atchison, KS) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lettlerhellocontribs 04:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kansas City philanthropists has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Kansas City philanthropists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lettlerhellocontribs 01:31, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ Like this.