Your contributed article, R.azz.miligi edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, R.azz.miligi. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Nefertiti. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nefertiti – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AllyD (talk) 19:15, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of R.azz.miligi edit

Hello R.azz.miligi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged R.azz.miligi for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Σσς. (Sigma) 23:16, 15 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Freeloading edit

The content of this page and your user page were inappropriate so I have moved both to User:R.azz.miligi/sandbox. Furthermore, since I see no evidence that you intend to make useful edits in the (article) namespace, I have blanked User:R.azz.miligi/sandbox and request that you do not attempt to revive it. Why on earth did you upload File:AkhenAton.jpg (three times!) when the image already exists on Commons? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:20, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

User page moved again. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dumping unreferenced text into articles and Talk pages edit

Both this article edit and this Talk page edit have been reverted. Please desist from adding inappropriate material to Wikipedia. AllyD (talk) 17:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Editing Wikipedia edit

Hello. I reverted your recent contribution to Smenkhkare. There are several reasons. It wasn't written according to Wikipedia format. It appeared to be original research. It didn't seem to be written from a neutral point of view. And it seemed to be a little off topic. I do want you to become a good Wikipedia editor. The first thing to accept (I had some difficulty with this at first) is that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. It is an encyclopedia, and as Wikipedia editors it is our goal (you, me, and all here) to make it a better encyclopedia. I wish you well. Happy editing. -- Guðsþegn (talk) 17:41, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, R.azz.miligi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Guðsþegn (talk) 17:42, 18 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nefertiti edit

Mr. Roger, I like Egyptology . I discovered one of the most important discovery in religion in general. I discovered the original letter "L" in Egyptian Hieroglyph. The Alx. the great ruled Egypt then the Ptolemaic s who changed the original signs and added a lot. The Rosetta stone had three kinds of languages one of them was the modified Hieroglyph. The original letter sign "L" was lost.

As a matter of facts this discovery leaded me to the fact that : Moses's monotheism is exactly like Akhenaten's monotheism.

Moses was Egyptian Prince lived in the king's palace. He spoke the Ancient Egyptian Language . There is no Hebrew writing system in this time. The Sole Great GOD spoke to Moses by Ancient Egyptian language and of course wrought the ten commandments by the only known language writing system to Prince Moses. MANY OF THE HEBREW RELIGIOUS TERMS HAD ORIGINAL HIEROGLYPH BASES.

I think I am not the only one who know this fact. But the fanatic scientists hatted this and reacted accordingly . I HOPE YOU RETURN BACK MY ARTICLES WHICH OF COURSE NOT Nefertity. Sorry it was AllyD comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by R.azz.miligi (talkcontribs) 18:08, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • AllyD and I are agreed that most of your submissions are incoherent. But there is a more serious problem: your stuff is, by your own admission, what we call in wiki-speak original research which is not allowed.
I most strongly recommend you to find some other place to publish your ideas. Look for an Egyptology forum or talk to Mmcannis (talk · contribs) who is into Egyptology or create your own website. You can look forward to the day when your ideas receive general acceptance and somebody else writes them up on Wikipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

User pages edit

Hello, please see the user page guidelines for information on what content is appropriate to put on your user page and what is not. In your user sandbox pages you have much more freedom to include tests and other drafts, but there are still guidelines that the content must be working towards improving the encyclopedia and not simply being used as a free webpage host. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:24, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

As another reminder, you may not use Wikipedia pages as your free web host as you did in this content. User pages are for stuff that is geared towards building an encyclopedia. Please stop using wikipedia for other purposes. continued disruptive editing will lead to you being blocked. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:05, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2012 edit

  This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Nefertiti, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wikipedia is not an internet forum. Talk pages are there to discuss the articles and their improvements, not to promote your personal ideas. Favonian (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC User:R.azz.miligi/sandbox (August 31) edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


 
Hello! R.azz.miligi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at AfC R.azz.miligi (September 5) edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/R.azz.miligi concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/R.azz.miligi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Siamun edit

I see that another editor has already reverted you. Please don't change the spelling - we use the most popular English name found in English reliable sources per WP:COMMONNAME. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 06:20, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

MV reply edit

MV reply edit

 
Hello, R.azz.miligi. You have new messages at MatthewVanitas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:R.azz.miligi/sandbox edit

 

Hello, R.azz.miligi. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Khentkaus IV edit

Hello R.azz.miligi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Khentkaus IV for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 15:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your deleted article edit

I've asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt#Khentkaus IV about it. I can copy the content to your userspace if you like. Doug Weller talk 15:17, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, forgot to come back here and say that given the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ancient Egypt#Khentkaus IV I don't see any point. However, you could join the discussion there and see if you can convince others. Doug Weller talk 19:24, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralizationsAreBad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GABgab 21:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
333-blue 09:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:R.azz.miligi/sandbox edit

 

Hello, R.azz.miligi. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 19:14, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The secret of sign L edit

The secret of sign " L "

The name of the Roman Emperor Tiberius Claudius in Egyptian Hieroglyphs has a very strange name order by using the mouth shape as R in Tiberius and also as L in Claudius The same sign of the mouth shape used as letters R and L. The original sign disappeared gradually in the Greek reign. Starting from Alexander the Great He used the lion as sign L in his name. king Ptolemy I used the sign mouth as letter L in his hieroglyphic name. During the use of Egyptian Hieroglyphs in Greek and Roman period they consider sign R as sign L the same mouth shape.

Refer to the Cartouche of: Alexander, Ptolemy, and Tiberius Claudius.

From my opinion the present sign L is a new invention but not for sure the original sign. R.azz.miligi (talk) 18:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply