Punk Rock London

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oliver Moheda (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oliver Moheda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Punk Rock London! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oliver Moheda (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oliver Moheda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 19:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Oliver Moheda

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Oliver Moheda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jamiebuba (talk) 19:41, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Punk Rock London. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Oliver Moheda, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 11:09, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Oliver Moheda has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oliver Moheda. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Total Artist Management for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Total Artist Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Artist Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pichpich (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

A note on deletion discussions

So far, some of your editing has been disruptive. You have placed templates on pages indicating that the result of the discussion was 'keep when no such decision has been made. It is not your decision to make whether the article is kept or deleted. There will be a discussion and, after a week, the article will be kept or deleted depending on the consensus. Falsely placing templates prematurely stating the outcome of the discussion, especially given your conflict of interest, is disruptive and I caution you not to do it again. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

It also appears that you have logged out comment on the discussion. This is not allowed. If this sort of behavior continues, you may be blocked from editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Punk Rock London. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

JASMINE (band)

I have moved this to draft space at Draft:JASMINE (band). This is very far removed from being ready for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please also see WP:NMUSICIAN. If you have questions, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 12:12, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Jasmine Elizabeth Nicol moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jasmine Elizabeth Nicol. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 12:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Please stop recreating articles in mainspace without supplying appropriate reliable, secondary sources. This draft on Jasmine has repeatedly been deleted and moved to draft space. If you persist in doing this, you will be blocked. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Red Light Management for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Light Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Light Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fermiboson (talk) 04:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Evaristo Paramos moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Evaristo Paramos. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sophie Lloyd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sophie Lloyd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste page move

Hello! What you did with "First Avenue Records" and "First Avenue Management" is called a "cut-and-paste page move" and should never be done on Wikipedia. (The revision history of the article "First Avenue Records" credits its authors. It is forbidden to take someone else's article and paste it into a new place. Read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia#Repairing cut-and-paste moves of a page, for example.)
I have compared the two articles, and they are exactly the same. I will now undo your edits. If you want the "First Avenue Records" renamed to "First Avenue Management", you can request a page move. See WP:RSPM. --Moscow Connection (talk) 23:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

"Pop-punk" and "5Angels"

Hello, I'm Moscow Connection. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pop-punk, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

You should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's rules and not add unsourced content as you did here and here.

I don't get it. Did you even read what what you wrote in "Pop-punk"" The result was: "An article by Kerrang! credited Machine Gun Kelly as well as Yungblud and As December Falls are bringing the genre back to mainstream attention." It’s ungrammatical. And the source doesn't even mention the band As December Falls. Did you simply want to link that new article you created? --Moscow Connection (talk) 00:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes I wanted to create a new article but I didn’t know how so that way is the only way that allows me to create a new page, Sorry I’m new could you teach me to create a new article without having to link it to a name already in Wikipedia, Many thanks and sorry about that, I’m learning. Punk Rock London (talk) 00:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

You can use the search bar to search for the title of the (as yet nonexistent) article, at which point there will be a prompt asking if you want to create it. Alternatively, you can insert the redlinks in your userspace instead of article space. Fermiboson (talk) 00:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

As Fermiboson said. Try using the search bar for something like "Fsdfsdfds". The page doesn't exist, so the "Search results" page will have this message: "The page "Fsdfsdfds" does not exist. You can create a draft and submit it for review, or you may create the page "Fsdfsdfds" directly."
And... Maybe that's a bad or dangerous advice, but... You can just click "Edit" anywhere on this page and write "[[Fsdfsdfds]]". If you have the visual editor enabled, you'll see the red link immediately. (And if you have it disabled, just click "Show preview" instead of "Publish changes". The page won't actually be saved.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 01:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Punk Rock London! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 10:20, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Punk Rock London! Your additions to As December Falls have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 10:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Jacob Hansen

Hello Punk Rock London, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jacob Hansen, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Hansen.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BuySomeApples}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:18, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Tags

Hello! I wonder why you placed so many tags on the articles "Kéllé Bryan" and "Vernie Bennett". Including {{Undisclosed paid}}? I think that shouldn't be done without explaining your reasoning in the edit summary or on the talk page.

Really, why {{COI}} and {{Undisclosed paid}}? Dou you have some information about the editors who created the articles?

And, by the way, Kéllé Bryan has charted as a solo artist with her single "Higher than Heaven". See WP:MUSICBIO #2, she is notable.

I just wonder... Could it be that you "mimic" someone who has placed some tags on your articles?... Yes, I know some Wikipedia editors like "tag bombing", it is not polite of them. --Moscow Connection (talk) 10:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Exactly that some editors have been taking advantage of me because I’m new by placing so many tags on my articles including to delete them and after that the articles has been voted to keep so that’s not right at all, Thank you for your advice though Punk Rock London (talk) 13:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

I had added multiple issues because to merge all the issues together, and I did not know why this user put any of these tags here. Sorry. TheGreatestLuvofAll ( chat with me ) 03:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of City of the Weak

Hello Punk Rock London,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged City of the Weak for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Yue🌙 05:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Bbb23 (talk) 14:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

I never take any payment this is totally wrong as I was only editing in subject that I was interested in, I hope you understand it and unblock me, Many thanks. Punk Rock London (talk) 15:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Unblock my account because I never take any payments

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punk Rock London (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have never taken any payment for editing Wikipedia the only thing that I did was to only edit articles that I was interested in because my mentor told me that I was allowed also i have read the guidelines and I request to be unblocked immediately as this is a false accusation against me, many thanksPunk Rock London (talk) 15:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think that Bbb23 is correct. 331dot (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punk Rock London (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I’ve never taken any payment also I don’t have anything to do with the articles I created so please show me proof of me taking any payment please Punk Rock London (talk) 03:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This doesn't ring true. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punk Rock London (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As you can see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jacob_Hansen people don’t believe that i got paid (Redacted) Punk Rock London (talk) 23:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

First, that remark at the AfD was not intended as a serious statement on whether you were paid (while I agree that your edits are not very high quality, there have been cases in the past where people have gotten paid for worse. And to be fair, I salute you for taking a disparaging remark like that and trying—emphasis trying—to turn it to your advantage. But that does not go far enough to unblock).

Second, though, our conflict of interest policy (short version) is very clear that money need not change hands for there to be a conflict of interest. If you do it at their behest for no consideration whatsoever, or if there's some really close connection like a family member or something, you will also run afoul of it.

Third, making a personal attack on a third party in an unblock request is never going to impress a reviewing admin.

Fourth, not only did it show a failure to assume good faith, it was a particularly scabrous personal attack, so egregious that we had to hide it from public view and only administrators can see it. You are now in the unenviable position where your conduct after getting blocked is an even stronger justification for an indefinite block than what you did to get the block in the first place. You have demonstrated unequivocally that you have serious issues that would be incompatible with editing Wikipedia productively.

And I reiterate Bbb23's warning below ... if you do these things again in another unblock request, that will be it for your access to this page (you would still be able to request unblock, but it would have to be private). — Daniel Case (talk) 10:51, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Punk Rock London, I've removed the personal attack. If you make another, you will lose access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dead Pony (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dead Pony and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:20, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Kaleido (band) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kaleido (band). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Insufficient context provided. It's not enough to state that this group simply exists.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

South Arcade (band) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to South Arcade (band). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Insufficient context provided. It's not enough to state that this group simply exists and that they toured with somebody.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Punk Rock London (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:56, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I learned my lesson, Please unblock me Punk Rock London (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

"Business for the Creative Industries" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Business for the Creative Industries has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 14 § Business for the Creative Industries until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Punk Rock London. Thank you for your work on Paul Prenter. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

IMO and edge case regarding wp:notability; I'm marking as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:JASMINE (band)

Hello, Punk Rock London. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:JASMINE (band), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jasmine Elizabeth Nicol

Hello, Punk Rock London. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jasmine Elizabeth Nicol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Evaristo Paramos

Hello, Punk Rock London. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Evaristo Paramos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)