User talk:Pilotguy/Archive6
Talk pageHey, thanks for the (really speedy) talk page revert. It was much appreciated. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 16:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks!
Oh wow, thanks! --Pilotguy (roger that) 19:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC) why did you blank Haukes talk page?http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hauke&diff=63328675&oldid=63206572 Tobias Conradi (Talk) 20:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC) What's your reason to remove the unblock request of user Hauke? [1] In case you support the mentioned allegation of sock puppetry, please provide evidence. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 11:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC) User:82.43.209.14Sorry, accidentally unblocked to extend at same time as your did. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 00:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 132.241.245.245 00:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)I don't like it when people post the location that I'm typing from. 132.241.245.245 00:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Gah!No, you can't leave, you're such a good admin! :( pschemp | talk 00:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Sir, please don't leave. Blnguyen | rant-line 06:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I truly, truly hope that our discussion last night didn't set this off, but I have a sinking feeling that it, at the very least, wasn't very helpful. Had I realised you were so stressed, I would have responded differently, but at that moment I felt a need to defuse a situation that has been the source of so many conflicts in the past. I sincerely understand your frustration about the outcome of the dispute between these users, though. If that's a big part of your wikistress now, please realise that no matter how hard we try, some issues just can't be resolved, no matter how much energy or effort we have invested in it. Let's learn from it, take a few deep breaths (either literally or in the form of a short wikibreak) and go on... Kind regards and all the best, --JoanneB 07:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Do not leave, please. The kind contributors are always around, but occasionally they are just not as audible as the unkind contributors in some places. Do not let that get you down. —xyzzyn 11:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
What the!? Are you leaving? --Bigtop (tk||cb|em|ea) 02:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC) RfA nom.Thanks so much for that great RfA nom! I will definitely accept, however, I must wait for 3 weeks first. I am leaving again for a real life vacation this weekend (not enough time for a seven day RfA process) and will be back two weeks from then. I will prepare by answering the questions now, and it will "go live" in about 3 weeks. Once again, thanks so much!! —Mets501 (talk) 15:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Deletion of User:1652186Do you consider that there is anything on my user page that User:LucVerhelst could need to have me blocked? Not that I acknowledge that there is anywhere else. 1652186 17:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Glad to see you're backHi there, I'm glad to see you're back to Wikipedia. I hope you're feeling better.--Tachikoma 20:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Not that it's very aeronautically derived...
Hey pilot!I would just like to say hi cuz you seem like a cool person :P keep up the good work man! Dspradau 01:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Hasn't actually edited in the last 48 hours, why exactly is it being targeted for a specific block?--205.188.117.10 02:34, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Hmm, I don't know... --Pilotguy (roger that) 15:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC) AFD on Dub PieceHi! I've recently put the article Dub Piece up for deletion, on the grounds that it's non-notable, and most probably created by the same people who created the videos. I'd appreciate your vote on the matter, either way (of course), at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dub Piece. Thanks! HawkerTyphoon 03:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Is making it very difficult to edit WP:AN without hitting an autoblock--205.188.117.10 14:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Taken care of --Pilotguy (roger that) 15:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC) block requestIf you consider it appropriate, could you please block user:R Haworth on the grounds that the name is too similar to mine? See this newbie edit. -- RHaworth 00:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Hi Pilotguy. I see that you just indef blocked user:Xanax is my FRIEND as a sockpuppet of User:WatchtowerJihad. Can you show me the evidence that lead you to this conclusion. Note am not saying you are wrong, its just that I couldn't see why AOL Account thought Xanax was a sockpuppet and I'd like to learn to recognize this one. Thanks, Gwernol 18:35, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thanks for blockthanks for the quick block on User:crazytales56297 is a faggot. I appreciate it. ~ ctales *blah* 20:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC) LandismasWhy did you delete Landismas? I'm trying to get something going! Willcore 21:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks. In closing the AFD you speedied the duplicate article that did not end with a full stop. The article I actually put up for AFD was the one with the full stop in the title (see above). I'm sorry - reading back - the AFD was't at all clear that there were two articles - the one for AFD and the other up for speedy. My fault. Still getting the hang of all this. Both articles were much of a muchness, would you mind revisiting the AFD and dealing with the extant article? Thanks Spartaz 23:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC) User:Misza13's pile!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
24.10.107.224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)Can you please block this user, i would suggest quite a long one as this user continues to vandalise pages in the exact same way I have repeatedly warned him/her not to, you can see what i mean from the talk page. Another 2 or 3 warning could probaly go on there from previous stuff i have just spotted but i thought it best to tell you instead, this ip is really starting to get me mad now. Childzy (Talk|Contribs) 21:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
User:Crabs!!!This user has contacted the unblocking list seeking information on why he was blocked. I assume it was because of an inappropriate username. This is his message. "I'd like to know why 'Crabs!!!' is an inappropriate name. As SOON as I created my account, I was looking around my file to see what everything did, and when I clicked contributions, it said I had a message. Figuring it was regarding something that would welcome me and explain different things, I opened it, and found I was banned. Here is the information which I was told to provide on the webpage: * Your IP address, which is 72.141.231.9 * The name of the blocking admin, which is Pilotguy * The reason you were blocked, which is: BLOCK!!! I assume the block was because of my name, because that was one of the included reasons, but I'd like to know why 'Crabs!!!' is inappropriate. There is not a single thing wrong with that name." Thanks for any help you can give me. Capitalistroadster 05:06, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Hello...but you protected the page, and I need the "blocked due to username" tag. Could you replace it on top of the user's page? Thanks. --Bigtop (tk||cb|em|ea) 20:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC) (User:I HATE NIGGERS 8888 is the target) Has again been unprotected. Please re-semi-protect. (removed and readded due to not minor edit) Hello32020 00:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Shougiku WineThank for diving in. Circeus 05:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC) I'm having trouble on the article "Illiteracy Will Prevail". The article was created by Arjy2, but 68.225.162.48 thinks on something else. Could you check with the user and talk to him? Thanks. --Bigtop (tk||cb|em|ea) 19:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC) Illiteracy will PrevailThe page in question that was ripped off uses PHP and is nested within frames. Provided for you below is the link to the direct information that was lifted. Please do not edit the article here with this information, since it doesn't have the left panel functionality it kills the ability to effectively use our site. http://www.livenirvana.com/sessions/home/december-1985.php Scroll past the chart at the top to where it says "Notes". You can check the previous versions on your site that had the full article and you'll see why we insisted that it be removed. I am sorry I come off short-tempered, but I was "issued" a final warning for deleting a plagiarized document and providing a link to the source. I felt there were more appropriate ways to handle the situation. To get to this (or any other session in Nirvana's history), simply pick whether it was a band practice, studio session, radio session, etc. from the side bar, then click the date. In this instance, it is: Band Practice and Home Recordings > December, 1985 P.S. Leaving messages and navigating the edit portion of your site is a nightmare. Can I get some help?I keep getting blocked because some ween out there is using my IP to vandalise... anything you can do to help would be much appreciated. (i voted in ur RfA thats how i know ur an admin) → p00rleno (lvl 76) ←ROCKS 13:07, Monday May 6 2024 (UTC)
look (REMOVING IN 24 hours!!!): Removed. Signpost updated for July 24th
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. --Michael Snow 04:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC) im a vandalnot a troll Here's a dilemma. You blocked the above user for being a vandal only account. Which it was. However, I'm curious how you're going to deal with THIS account, since I haven't and don't plan on engaging in vandalism. Amazing Grace 00:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Since you're actually approachable......please restore the ED discussion at DRV so it can have its full hearing. DRV debates stay up for 5 days, and that was barely two. Considering the gross process issues that the article encountered, it should be allowed the full discussion. --badlydrawnjeff talk 00:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
I strongly suggest you to restore this debate. You were not a neutral party since you voted both on AfD and DRV and 5 days hasn't passed yet. This is totally unacceptable, and you know it. Grue 08:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Would you care to explain your actions as to why you reverted ALL of my edits to this page, of which none were vandalism, and all were attempting to improve the article so that there was no copyvio or anything else wrong with the page? Now the page is protected, and I don't see any valid reason why it is protected? There's no vandalism, no edit warring, going on. Just an editor trying to improve an article. Not like there's anything wrong with that. Dr. Cash 01:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Spelling correctionYo, man, while you were messing up with my user talk page you made a seemingly error: "you way wish to review". i edited it to "may". have your spellcheck on next time. cheers.89.32.1.82 17:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC) i recommand you argue the fact that my comment was rude and disrespectful. otherwise i will consider your warning unwarranted and bring forth this issue to an admin.89.32.1.82 18:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC) I am an admin, so you are out of luck there, and now I suggest you use a spellchecker. Any more of your superflouros comments will warrant a block. You've been warned and blocked many times for this. --Pilotguy (roger that) 18:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC) User:155.84.57.253I saw you'd unblocked User:155.84.57.253 because it is a shared IP. While I'm not sure that the block was entirely merited, I am very familiar with this user and I have never seen any evidence of the IP being used by more than one person. I don't think that any collateral damage would result form a block. Also, the blocking policy says that prior to an unblock there should be a discussion with the blocking admin, or on AN/I. -Will Beback 22:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC) User:FeedThePigeonsHi. You protected User:FeedThePigeons on July 7th. That's fine, but I'm hoping you can add Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of EddieSegoura to the user page for me. I've also emptied Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Pilotguy which should be deleted (it was created to attack you). Thanks. If you have any questions, please contact me. —Viriditas | Talk 00:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Crossmr continues incivilityI need you to look at his recent edits to user talk pages, especially mine. It appears that 12 hours on July 11 were not enough to cool him down. Thanks in advance. CoolKatt number 99999 02:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC) User monty pythonYou removal of the TfD notice was premature, so your edit was reverted. If you have an opinion on this matter, take it to the TfD discussion here. - LA @ 02:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC) LLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLL20:44, 26 July 2006 Pilotguy (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "DDDDDDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNN (contribs)" with an expiry time of indefinite (BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE) Nice! — Deckiller 02:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC) recent edit to my talk page...by an IP was actually by me; my browser session timed out for some reason and I didn't notice until after I committed the change. RC Patrol can be fast :) . Just FYI. --EngineerScotty 04:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC) nothere is actually NO reason why it is blocked, at all, the only thing at the top of the page is a standard blocking template, the is no reason, and no explanation, so unless you're suggesting that all IPs should be blocked, and you're willing to do the honors yourself and create the worlds largest range block 1.0.0.0/255.255.255.255 I see no reason for it to remain in place, and will find someone who will remove it--AOL account 14:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Hm?User:155.84.57.253, whom you blocked for 6 months as an extended vandal... are you sure you didn't mean some other IP, possibly one quite close to that? I've looked through recent edits by that IP, and there's nothing that seems particularly objecionable. DS 14:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC) I was watching this too, and it's suspicious, but it seems possible to me that there's no malicious intent here. Do you think 48 hours of block for disruption is really neccessary? Friday (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks A difficult requestHi Pilotguy, A somewhat biaised report of claimed "uncivility" was made on WP:ANI#Ethnic slur by an editor against an other. Both spend their time yelling at each other and disputing over the content. However, some people taking part in the discussion think that the report was false and the blocking injust, and are asking for a block review, claiming that the block is one-sided an unjustified. I'm asking you because AFAIK, you have no involvement is this affair, and therefore will be able to provide a neutral point of view on this whole sordid thing. Thanks in advance, Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 12:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Update: forget it, it was reviewed already. Sorry for bothering you :) -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 20:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC) No problem. --Pilotguy (roger that) 20:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 12:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC) What's your reason to remove the unblock request of user Hauke?What's your reason to remove the unblock request of user Hauke? [4] In case you support the mentioned allegation of sock puppetry, please provide evidence. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 20:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC) A questionHi... I've been wondering about this, so I thought I'd ask you, since I saw you do this for the Diamond/Pearl article. What is that template that is used when you revert where it says "Reverted edits by ? (talk) to last version by ?"... If I'm supposed to use a template or message when reverting I would like to know what to type... Thanks.--Coltonblue 00:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC) unblock tagSorry, but I wasn't the one for whom it was blocked and the user talk page was protected so I didn't know what to do. Please undo it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.35.1.12 (talk • contribs) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
