User talk:Nomian/Archives/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Bangladeshi rock

Please see Talk:Bangladeshi rock#Requested move. – Fayenatic London 18:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangladesh–Chile relations

Hello Nomian,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bangladesh–Chile relations for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 16:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Re:Reconsideration Reply

Hello, Nomian. You have new messages at Rafaelgriffin's talk page.
Message added 14:13, 17 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangladesh–Slovakia relations

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bangladesh–Slovakia relations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  CombieTractor  20:16, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Reconsideration

Hello, Nomian. You have new messages at Combie-tractor's talk page.
Message added 20:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 CombieTractor  20:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Bangladesh–Poland relations, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. This can help you too, as the WikiProject members will often defend your work from deletion and try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Bangladesh–Mauritius relations) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Bangladesh–Mauritius relations, Nomian!

Wikipedia editor Titodutta just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add categories.

To reply, leave a comment on Titodutta's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		You actually deserve a South-South barnstar. Good to see the expansion of coverage on Bangladesh foreign relations : )--Bazaan (talk) 13:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you for encouraging me. :-) Nomian (talk) 14:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Middle power

Thanks for your recent edits on middle power. It looks like a recent edit of yours changed a bunch of minor things unintentionally, perhaps because you accidentally saved an older version of the page? I have tried to restore the intermediate edits that were lost as well as maintain your changes; hopefully I haven't missed anything. Thanks, Beland (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

You have missed the most important part, someone wrongly put India in the great power list which is actually a middle power. Anyway, I am fixing it up. Regards Nomian (talk) 19:01, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content to articles. Adding broken links or citations to non-existent sources is not the same things as "providing sources". You have an obligation to provide sources and I have every right to remove content you have added for which a source has not been provided. Beyond that, re-adding information which is promotional in nature, badly-worded or in language that makes little sense is not productive and is plainly disruptive. I'm sorry you spent a considerable amount of time creating articles for subjects that don't meet our inclusion guidelines but that doesn't give you the right to edit-war to add unsourced content to those articles. St★lwart¹¹¹ 20:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't know what childish game you're playing but edit-warring and then templating a regular editor with inapplicable nonesense is just silly. You are reverting edits that involved far more than the removal of non-existent references. Given your disingenuous sourcing of other articles, and given the WP:BURDEN is on you to verify the content you are trying to add, you need to use the talk pages of those articles (per WP:BRD) to gain consensus for the addition of unsourced content, poor grammar, poor English and flowery language you keep reverting the removal of. Actually have a look at the edits in question rather than just blindly edit-warring because you don't understand policy. I have no qualms about reporting you and your disruptive edits speak for themselves. St★lwart¹¹¹ 14:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Stop. Now. WP:Link rot is a how-to guide, not a policy and it doesn't give you the right to edit-war to add un-sourced content and claims to articles. Your un-sourced claims have been challenged. Your next step is to take them to the talk page for discussion. St★lwart¹¹¹ 14:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

They are not unsourced, you are just blanking these articles to have them deleted. This is clear violation of WP:Civility and WP:Assume good faith. If the links are not working then consider them as offline sources, sources don't have to be online always. And I have told you in edit summaries to google the news titles which will prove the sources exist. Nomian (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

I haven't blanked a single article, in fact I added information based on the few sources that did exist and could be used to verify claims made. You're blindly edit-warring to cut-paste roll-back a series of edits because you disagree (contrary to policy) with one of them. I'm happy to assume good faith but given your disingenuous suggestions that some primary sources are secondary sources and the obvious misrepresentation of other sources to make some blatantly exaggerated claims, you no longer get a "free pass" where WP:V and WP:RS are concerned. I'm not going to "assume" the sources you say exist actually exist. You "google them", you find them, you bring them to article talk pages and you gain consensus for adding information once it can be verified. That's how this works. St★lwart¹¹¹ 15:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

• Your nonsense accusations without a scrap of evidence are a clear and blatant personal attack. I request that you strike them and (again) read what has been written, read the edits made and read relevant policies. St★lwart¹¹¹ 15:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Personal attacks are those false accusations that you are putting against me, I never made any unsourced claims. You are removing the sources, blanking the articles and now saying I added unsourced contents. This is simply disruptive. Nomian (talk) 15:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

• There seem to be a possible editor-targeting going on. Guys keep it civil, no need to take these things so personally. --Zayeem ^(talk) 09:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	A token of appreciation for your valuable contributions, keep editing... Zayeem (talk) 09:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

• Thank you. It came at a time when I'm going through a rough period in Wikipedia, thank you very much. Nomian (talk) 18:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem dude, Do let me know if you need any help. You can also post at WP:BDB. Thanks. --Zayeem ^(talk) 11:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	A special barnstar for you did not give up and appealed for review.  SAMI  talk 14:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks, I am glad to see the righteous verdict in the DRV. :-) Nomian (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Me too :)-- SAMI  ^talk 05:35, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan–Bangladesh relations

Hi Nomain! I appreciate all that you done in the foreign relations articles, more so as a Bangladeshi. Bangladesh recognizing the country in 1992 or the support in territorial dispute in not noteworthy, special or notable. A more interesting article could be Bangladesh-North Korea, Vietnam, Denmark etc. I do not feel the relationship has enough content to merit a full article.I could be wrong, I remain open to changing my opinion if you can provide more content with citation, with regards Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Vinegarymass911, thanks a lot for your appreciation, it means a lot. I am actually planning to create those articles but I have had a rough time in Wikipedia recently which is discouraging me to create more articles. Actually, sources from Bangladeshi news portals are hard to come by, so I have to rely on whatever I get. Yet I found seven reliable sources with significant coverage, don't you think it's enough to be notable according to the general notability guidelines? Besides, the two countries have signed three agreements with each other. Nomian (talk) 22:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Don't get discouraged, you are doing good work. Even if the article is deleted, don't take it personally, it happens. If you need any help with any article please let me know. Sources are difficult, I recently worked on the seven Bir Sreshtho and it was difficult to find any source. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks bro. I will try my best. Nomian (talk) 21:00, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Look East policy

Hi Nomian. You moved Look East policy to Look East policy (India), but that is an unnecessary disambiguation. Even if Look East policy (Bangladesh) was created as suggested in Diff of Look East policy, the Indian Look East policy would likely be Wikipedia:PRIMARYTOPIC with a hatnote to Look East policy (Bangladesh) if it existed. I suggest we move Look East policy (India) back, but what do you think? — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC) (please  mention me on reply)

Dear Sam Sailor, I don't think there is any primary topic for Look East policy because it's not only Bangladesh, even Saudi Arabia [1], Iran [2], Malaysia [3], Zimbabwe [4] and may be some other countries also have been pursuing this policy. Several more articles may be created on this topic. So I think it will be better if we keep that disambiguation. Nomian (talk) 15:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Welcome back. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much Vinegarymass911 for remembering me. :-) Nomian (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nomian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–Croatia relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–Croatia relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Croatia relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 00:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–the Gambia relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–the Gambia relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–the Gambia relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 01:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nomian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–Tanzania relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–Tanzania relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Tanzania relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–Papua New Guinea relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–Papua New Guinea relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Papua New Guinea relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 02:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–Kenya relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–Kenya relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Kenya relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

• Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?

• COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money

• News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin

• In the media: Dog days gone bad

• Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy

• Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom

• Traffic report: Now for something completely different

• Gallery: Photos of threatened species from iNaturalist

• News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users

• Recent research: Receiving thanks increases retention, but not the time contributed to Wikipedia

• Essay: Not compatible with a collaborative project

• Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil

• In focus: WikiLoop DoubleCheck, reviewing edits made easy

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Nick-D on 1945

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: July 2020

This Month in GLAM – Volume X, Issue VII, July 2020 Headlines Albania report: Wikimedia CEE Spring 2020 in Albania and Kosova Australia report: New WikiClub and Australian GLAM Research Brazil report: Important records of Brazilian history: images, metadata and edit-a-thons Finland report: Rephotography walks during the pandemic France report: Bibliothèque Sainte Geneviève Germany report: Hacking the Arts Netherlands report: October history month East-West, Pictures as a legacy to the world & Photos of Mali Serbia report: Wikimedia Serbia is working on new activities Sweden report: More Swedish music – of all sorts Uganda report: Sensitisation of GLAM institutions in Uganda UK report: The effect of a Commons Picture of the Day USA report: AfroCROWD, AAPB, Philadelphia, Smithsonian Calendar: August's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 05:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Strikeout?

Hello, I think it is better to strikeout a talkpage comment, instead of outright removal. Y Here's a cup of tea while you consider it. It's better than beer, you know. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 06:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

I thought there wouldn't be any issue since I was editing my own comment. There was also no reply to that comment. Nomian (talk) 05:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 18:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

• News and notes: The high road and the low road

• In the media: Storytelling large and small

• Featured content: Going for the goal

• Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way

• Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax

• Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics

• News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online

• Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles

• Arbitration report: A slow couple of months

• From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?

• Obituaries: Marcus Sherman, Jerome West, and Pauline van Till

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
• HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
• Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review Essay: Nick-D on the Historical Aircraft Restoration Society

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2020

This Month in GLAM – Volume X, Issue VIII, August 2020 Headlines Albania report: Wikivoyage edit-a-thon - Editing Albania and Kosovo’s travel destinations Brazil report: Open innovation and dissemination activities: wrapping up great achievements on a major GLAM in Brazil Czech Republic report: First Prague Wiki Editathon held in Prague Estonia report: Virtual exhibition about Polish-Estonian relations. Rephotography and cultural heritage Germany report: KulTour in Swabia and 8000 documents new online India report: Utilising Occasion for Content donation: A story Netherlands report: WMIN & WMNL collaboration & Japanese propaganda films Serbia report: Enriching Wiki projects in different ways Sweden report: Free music and new recordings of songs in the public domain; Autumn in the libraries; Yes, you can hack the heritage this year – online! Uganda report: Participating in the African Librarians Week (24-30 May 2020) UK report: Spanish metal and ... USA report: Wiknic & Black Artists Matter & Respect Her Crank WMF GLAM report: Wikipedia Library, new WikiCite grant programs, and GLAM office hours Calendar: September's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 21:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

TheWikiWizard/Issues/September 2020

Hello, Nomian! Here is the September 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard.

• What's Hot! ("working from home")
• Articles (New One this month)
• Interviews (New Interview!)
• News about Wikipedia! (Wikipedia News and Updates!)
• Editor's Notes (News/Updates!)
• Activity Page (Activities!...)
• Ads (Super Cool Ads)

To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 00:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

• Special report: Paid editing with political connections

• News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki

• In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later

• Featured content: Life finds a Way

• Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests

• Traffic report: Is there no justice?

• Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

• Special report: Paid editing with political connections

• News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki

• In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later

• Featured content: Life finds a Way

• Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests

• Traffic report: Is there no justice?

• Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)