Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Nitin.35, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 02:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Centralizing project discussion

When a project includes multiple operational pages, it is generally best to redirect their discussion pages to the main discussion page for the project. That way, participants remain aware of what is going on with the project without having to search out every nook and cranny where discussions may be taking place.

The exception to this strategy is when a task is delegated that would generate a great deal of discussion, and centralizing it with the project's other discussions would create a discussion page of unmanageable size.

Read more:
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Conflict of interest editing on Wikipedia edit

  Hello, Nitin.35. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
98   Indian National Trade Union Congress (talk) Add sources
1,710   Sidharth Shukla (talk) Add sources
24   Walt Disney Attractions Japan (talk) Add sources
145   Secular Progressive Front (talk) Add sources
743   Ek Hazaaron Mein Meri Behna Hai (talk) Add sources
451   Beant Singh (assassin) (talk) Add sources
261   Target rating point (talk) Cleanup
125   Virtual event (talk) Cleanup
1,182   Bharti Singh (talk) Cleanup
877   Kashmiri Pandit (talk) Expand
77   Bigg Boss Halla Bol (talk) Expand
334   Criticism of Google (talk) Expand
2,288   Salesforce (talk) Unencyclopaedic
125   Disney University (talk) Unencyclopaedic
32   Subhreet Kaur Ghumman (talk) Unencyclopaedic
651   ABP News (talk) Merge
1,732   Shweta Tiwari (talk) Merge
47,782   Microsoft Office (talk) Merge
165   Carol Gracias (talk) Wikify
886   Kumar Sangakkara (talk) Wikify
4,584   Feroze Gandhi (talk) Wikify
4   Fincash.com (talk) Orphan
28   Mention (company) (talk) Orphan
41   CleverTap (talk) Orphan
5   Apoorv Wankhade (talk) Stub
200   Rishabh Sinha (talk) Stub
16   Swapnil Asnodkar (talk) Stub
327   Groww (talk) Stub
44   Lux Capital (talk) Stub
57   Oak Investment Partners (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edureka (July 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 11:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nitin.35! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 11:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of PushEngage for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PushEngage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PushEngage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yulu Bikes (September 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 00:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Yulu Bikes edit

  Hello, Nitin.35. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Yulu Bikes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Yulu Bikes edit

 

Hello, Nitin.35. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yulu Bikes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Edureka edit

  Hello, Nitin.35. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Edureka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mobile Premier League for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mobile Premier League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile Premier League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

nearlyevil665 05:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kuvera.in for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuvera.in is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuvera.in until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Benedikt Gerendeg (talk) 06:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply