Nili Dahan

Your submission at Articles for creation: Host response to cancer therapy (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Host response to cancer therapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Host response to cancer therapy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Nili Dahan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Referencing format wrong

Journal references are supposed to provide a hyperlink to the article abstract at PubMed. Yours don't. See Help:Referencing for beginners. For journal articles where I have a PMID number from the abstract as it appears at PubMed, there is a program to create references by entering the PMID number. Use https://tools.wmflabs.org/citation-template-filling/cgi-bin/index.cgi You still have to add the ref brackets at both ends. For ref name= the quotation marks are not required. Also, I recommend using the first author's last name and the year of publication as a ref name rather than numbers. Lastly, I recommend putting in time improving existing articles before again essaying article creation. Myself, 10+ years, 15,000 edits, five articles raised to Good Article status - and zero articles created. David notMD (talk) 15:16, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Host response to cancer therapy (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Host response to cancer therapy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Host response to cancer therapy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 15:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Comment: Resubmitting a declined article with major problems after making only minor changes usually leads to a decline from a different editor, as seen here. David notMD (talk) 18:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nili Dahan! You created a thread called Request for a second opinion (after article rejection) at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Host response to cancer therapy has been accepted

Host response to cancer therapy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)