Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Association for the Study of Modern Italy edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Association for the Study of Modern Italy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://asmi.org.uk/about/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Association for the Study of Modern Italy edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Association for the Study of Modern Italy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://asmi.org.uk/about/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KingofEnggs (talk) 13:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Stephen Gundle moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Stephen Gundle, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Gundle (May 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Neolinguista! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Stephen Gundle has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stephen Gundle. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Stephen Gundle edit

  Hello, Neolinguista. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stephen Gundle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Gundle has been accepted edit

 
Stephen Gundle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 22:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Philip Cooke (Historian) has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Philip Cooke (Historian). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Draft:Philip Cooke (historian). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

those were there by mistake!Please see the conversation, I had created those mantainance templates myself, by coping and pasting material from another bibliography. thanks Neolinguista (talk) 17:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
That is correct but check the history I had already removed the incorrect templates, your edit removed my AFC comments. Theroadislong (talk) 17:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
ah, ok, sorry! Neolinguista (talk) 17:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
but anyway, I got it, and I am looking for more references! Neolinguista (talk) 17:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Philip Cooke (historian) has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Philip Cooke (historian). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi, ok, I got what you mean now: I have now added 3 more (10, 11 and 12), all truly independent, please, check. In the rest of the article I am mostly stating facts, and therefore primary sources should be fine as facts just need to be verified. Re the video on YouTube, ok, I agree in general, but that's a video of Philip Cooke himself giving the very keynote speech mentioned in reference 8. Thanks for your help in this matter. Neolinguista (talk) 09:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Philip Cooke (historian) has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Philip Cooke (historian). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Philip Cooke (historian) (January 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Drmies (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply