User talk:Morbidthoughts/Archive 10

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

WP:AVOIDVICTIM

WP:AVOIDVICTIM does not say that when a victim has spoken publicly and self-identified, that one should delete her name -- even if it is completely sourced, neutral, and on-topic. Rather, just the opposite, it says to make certain it is completely sourced, neutral, and on-topic in such cases. You seem to be editing as though it says something it does not say. Also, when someone reveals their name publicly, there is -- apart from this guideline - little reason to not include it. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:A4E8:34C9:2261:4F37 (talk) 05:59, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

I disagree. Including the detail of her identity would prolong the victimization. Wikipedia is one of the 10 most popular websites in the world, and the inclusion of her name on this website should not be as being the alleged victim of sexual assault. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:51, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on James Harden

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page James Harden, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Edits to Baroness Joanna Shields page

My name is Laura and I work for Joanna Shields, Baroness Shields, a baron, businessperson, and former British politician. The page about her was recently tagged for COI and advert issues due to some poor edits made years ago. I posted here regarding my desire to address the substance of the tags with a re-write or heavy trims, to remove the promotional content. I was hoping you might be willing to chime in on the proposed trims and/or the suggestion for a rewrite. Let me know. Best regards.~~~~ LauTad89 (talk) 14:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

You can get an editor to review and implement your suggestions (if appropriate) by tagging them with an edit COI template on the article talk page. See WP:MAKINGEREQ. Even though I know nothing about the Baroness, wikipedia biographies are not meant to be CVs or resumes so anything sourced to them or speaker-submitted bios should be removed. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine

Hi, @Morbidthoughts. I ask for your help with the page, which is in a rather deplorable state, and for trying to make it more neutral you are immediately accused of something. Is it generally normal to remove tags about disputed neutrality immediately, without waiting for the end of the discussion? Colaheed777 (talk) 20:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Bakri

Since you were one of the last people to be involved on Talk:Adam Bakri, I'd like to ask that you take another look. There's some stuff going on such that I'm reluctant to take unilateral action. DS (talk) 01:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Theo Lengyel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Theo Lengyel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theo Lengyel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Yngvadottir (talk) 02:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

		The Pornography Barnstar
		For your work in WikiProject Pornography Demt1298 (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Marking WP:NAC

Greetings! First off, I'd like to say I very much appreciate your comments and edits. I don't follow anyone, but I count you among the editors I enjoy running into. I also agree with your recent discussion closure at BLPN. My ask here is to please add to your closing comments and edit summaries: WP:NAC. Not everyone knows how to find User Rights, and routine, good-faith, and much needed closures might give someone else the wrong impression. I'm quite certain I've forgotten to tag myself before. My wall of text is now heavier than the actual issue, so I leave it there. Looking forward to more BLPN times, thank you, and cheers! JFHJr (㊟) 00:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Marking NACs is just not required nor consistently followed outside of deletion discussions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Amouranth

Greetings. I have a query regarding the omission of her DOB at this discussion. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hello, I'm TheDarkKnight433. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Abbas Ansari have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Why did you delete the whole source claiming the statement. Also, there is live discussion going in the talk page. Don't revert it without concensus. It's a vandalism of article. TheDarkKnight433 (talk) 03:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

The article is currently being discussed at BLPN.[1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Dispute on Talk:LiveJasmin#Latest_proposed_"Controversy"_section_improved_after_a_number_of_suggestions_from_the_community

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Alexfotios (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

T.H.

I'm getting to the point where I either need to step back from this Henyard nonsense or take it to AN/I. I will be ignoring the page unless there's something there that didn't come from SecretName101. Please tag me if anything develops that's actually worth engaging in. Simonm223 (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

In fact, scratch that, I'm just walking away from this one. Apologies. Simonm223 (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

No problem. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Article related to Abbas Ansari

I noticed that you recently reverted the entire article of Abbas Ansari. I wanted to inquire about the reason behind this action. The article was previously edited by a user named goodfacts, who is a known sock of someone and has been banned. The information in the article, including details about Abbas Ansari's involvement in multiple murder cases and the arrest of his wife, was sourced from reliable articles and is already included there. Furthermore, the structure of the article was concise and provided clear information. However, the recent edits made by the banned user resulted in fragmented sections and compromised the overall clarity of the article. Considering these factors, I believe it would be appropriate to revert to the previous version of the article for a more coherent presentation of the information. Thank you for your attention to this matter.Hii, I noticed that you recently reverted the entire article of Abbas Ansari. I wanted to inquire about the reason behind this action. 2402:8100:384C:2AA8:1505:7A5E:857D:D6D0 (talk) 20:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

I believe you are the blocked user, User:TheDarkKnight433. Biographies of living people are to be written conservatively. The information about the murder is not directly supported in the citation given, because it seems to be referring to Mukhtar's murder cases. WP:BLPCRIME applies to accusations about his wife so the information is meant to be limited. Discussion and consensus must be reached at Talk:Abbas Ansari before reinstatement of any disputed edits. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

What about adding 'Indian gangster turned politician' or "Indian gangster and politician" in front of his dad's name? I can provide you with the source, and it's also written on Mukhtar Ansari's page that he was a gangster first. Additionally, about his wife, she was not accused but given jail by the court, so this has to be added. Also so many details about his great-grandfather were also added, isn't that supposed to be limited in the background, and why are the details of his father just so small? Also, there are too many short sections. It's already mentioned twice in the introduction that he is a politician from some constituency, so what's the need to add another representative column just to add this thing once again?

https://www.cnbctv18.com/india/politician-mukhtar-ansari-sentenced-to-years-in-jail-15430361.htm

https://www.etvbharat.com/english/state/uttar-pradesh/nikhat-ansari-released-on-bail/na20230819111610431431881 2402:8100:384E:3694:1505:7A5E:857D:D6D0 (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

WP:PROXYING Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Editors in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a banned or blocked editor (sometimes called proxy editing or proxying) unless they are able to show that the changes are productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits.

I'm giving you reliable sources and you didn't answer my question. 2402:8100:384E:3694:1505:7A5E:857D:D6D0 (talk) 21:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

WP:CHOICE Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Maa chuda laude k baal. Now go to the Google translator and translate it mf. 106.79.237.248 (talk) 19:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Naw, too much work per WP:CHOICE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)