Introduction to contentious topics edit

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sideswipe9th (talkcontribs) 22:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring notification edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. In particular, you have restored an {{NPOV}} tag at the article, in the face of opposition from four editors at the article, to wit:

Recent activity at Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine
Removed NPOV tag Restored NPOV tag
Timestamp revision User Timestamp revision User
16:48, 4 August 2023 1168729801 Sideswipe9th 10:50, 20 October 2023 1181024974 Colaheed777
16:06, 20 October 2023 1181059318 LilianaUwU 16:29, 27 October 2023 1182176132 Colaheed777
05:08, 2 November 2023 1183102187 Mathglot 02:40, 3 November 2023 1183247219 Colaheed777
03:11, 3 November 2023 1183250333 DanielRigal 04:30, 3 November 2023 1183257276 Colaheed777

as well as opposition by editors in this discussion at the Talk page, which you raised.

Discussing at Talk is the right thing to do, but just because that is ongoing, does not give you the right to edit war at the article while it is going on. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. You should continue to discuss at the Talk page, seeking consensus, and not continually revert others at the article.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mathglot (talk) 03:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm not trying to initiate an edit war, but removing a tag without finding consensus is not very constructive. Colaheed777 (talk) 23:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Er, my glasses must've fogged up again. Did you mean, "Placing a tag four times without finding any support for it is not very constructive"? Mathglot (talk) 01:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice about editing articles related to the Arab–Israeli conflict edit

  You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. If you have questions, feel free to ask below, or at the Arbitration Committee Clerks Noticeboard. Mathglot (talk) 03:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Jeffrey H. Jackson edit

  Hello, Colaheed777. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jeffrey H. Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply