MontyMee
Welcome! edit
|
November 2011 edit
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — Jean Calleo (talk) 00:54, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Signature edit
Don't sign your edit summaries, do sign your posts on talk pages.
I'm glad you've taken an interest in WikiProject Occult, you may want to put your name in the list. — Jean Calleo (talk) 03:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to AfC space edit
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:MontyMee/The Scottish witch-hunt in context has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish witch-hunt in context, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Editing protected articles edit
You should be able to edit most protected articles ('semiprotected') including Germaine Greer, as you just did. Happy editing. Materialscientist (talk) 22:18, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Hostility? edit
Why did you say that editors here are "hostile"? Isn't that a little harsh? Or have there been specific situations where somebody was hostile at you? Incivility is unacceptable here, and you can/should ask for help if somebody else is acting like that. — Jean Calleo (talk) 23:27, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Sometimes there are people, as in all walks of life - that are hostile. How is anything harsh, what am I supposed to say, gentile? If so than nothing that would come out of a person's mouth would be correct, would it? Incivility is unacceptable, but it does happen. With that, as I have seen user:ladyofshallot say, just walk away.MontyMee (talk)
- Incivility is literally against policy, see WP:CIVIL. If you have problems with editors being hostile, as you said, you can seek help at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance.
- I'm just concerned because earlier you implied very clearly that the average editor here is hostile. That's just not right. But since you seem to be relatively new here, I'd be glad to help clear up any confusion. — Jean Calleo (talk) 01:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
The article needs to be fleshed out a little more. It's a good subject but just needs to have more added to it to show context. You also need to find some reliable sources (WP:RS) to show how the book is notable per WP:BOOK. These might be hard to find, so I just wanted to give you fair warning. Right now the only thing that really seems to keep it from being put into the mainspace are reliable sources. Just to let you know, the book itself cannot be a reliable source as far as showing notability goes. I tried clicking on the third link but it came up with an error message. I hope you don't get disheartened by this since this is otherwise a good start. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
Your submission at Articles for creation edit
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 15:51, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Say something about your own history...
I was christened Megan Montgomery Wilson...an enyclopedia is factual and needs to be correct for eternity after we are dead and gone and no-one is left to correct it.
I was born on 13 Oct 1985, lived in Houston etc etc
Education history
Links to other people
Stephen.xx
You drink too much — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.249.10.116 (talk) 00:44, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish witch-hunt in context, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 10:04, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission The Scottish witch-hunt in context edit
Hello MontyMee. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Scottish witch-hunt in context.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Scottish witch-hunt in context}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 11:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)