March 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pelé (footballer born 1978), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 19 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kevin Ellison (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EFL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Wallace, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Joe Perry, Mark King and Shaun Murphy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1994 Pontins Professional, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Wilkinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Daniel Powell edit

Hi,

Please read the content of the article and citations, which state Powell's contract with Milton Keynes Dons expires at the end of 2016–17, which is after 30 June 2017. His Northampton Town contract is effective from 1 July 2017. The changes and citation that you added to the article were misleading. We don't update a player's current club until the contract with the club begins, which is WP:FOOTY consensus. Thank you. LTFC 95 (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi,

OK, thanks for letting me know. I was aware of the consensus; it was an oversight on my part in not reading the article properly. All the best, Monty (talk) 22:09, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sefton Payne for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sefton Payne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sefton Payne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 14:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1993 UK Championship (snooker)
added a link pointing to Steve Campbell
Spencer Dunn (snooker player)
added a link pointing to West Midlands

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Montgomery15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sources, re Rowan Vine edit

Hello. Was wondering what source you had for Mr Vine's appearances for Hartley Wintney. I can't find anything anywhere. thanks, Struway2 (talk) 12:00, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The information I got from the club's Twitter account, specifically images of the teamsheets for each match and their live coverage on Twitter. In fairness I don't know if Twitter is a 'reliable source' as far as Wikipedia goes, though. If it can't or shouldn't be used, fair enough. Montgomery15 (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

It can be used, if it's official, and so long as it's explicitly cited. Although going through months worth of tweets and counting appearances from names on teamsheet images or in text commentary isn't entirely reliable because of human error, and would be a total pain to cite individually.
The problem I have with that is, unless the relevant tweets have been deleted since, Hartley Wintney FC's twitter doesn't seem to show teamsheet images, and Vine's name isn't mentioned in the live coverage for every game he played in.
What started this was, someone updated the stats table last night, and their update was undone as unsourced. And the person complained, not unreasonably, that it seemed unfair for their update to be removed while the equally unsourced figures in the infobox were allowed to stay. So I started checking, and the infobox figures are fine except for Hartley Wintney and the current Gosport spell, which I presumed was a typo.
Mr Vine made his Hartley Wintney debut in the FA Trophy on 28 October, and he went back to Gosport at the beginning of March. Between those dates, they played 18 league matches, according to their fixture page, which means that for his stats really to be 18/9, he must have played in all 18. But he didn't: see e.g. Egham Town 4 February... Struway2 (talk) 13:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for clearing that up; the figures from his return to Gosport weren't a typo, unfortunately for me, but me being rather slapdash and not citing the source...which I'll rectify now. Montgomery15 (talk) 15:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Ah, my apologies, I've just gone back to the article and seen your recent edit. Montgomery15 (talk) 15:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Robinson (footballer, born December 1978), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EFL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Greaves ans Spencer edit

Hi Montgomery15, you had undone this edit in the article David Greaves. User:Rafael Zink and I discus the topic in the dewiki with the result, that the left person is John Spencer and the right David Greaves (here). Why do you think, that Greaves is left? Greetings, --Snookerado (talk) 16:05, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Snookerado, I think it's clear when you look at other images of Spencer throughout his life, especially from the '70s and '80s while he was playing - as the image I've linked here shows (https://c8.alamy.com/comp/DRAHHD/john-spencer-at-the-embassy-world-snooker-tournament-crucible-theatre-DRAHHD.jpg). The facial features of the man on the right of your shot are identical to those of the John Spencer in the photo I've linked to. So, unless he was a great magician and managed to be two people at once...the other man must be David Greaves. Thanks, Montgomery15 (talk) 16:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Montgomery15, thank you for the link, now it is clear. Rafael is a filemover on commons, so I asked him if he could swap the files. Greetings, --Snookerado (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi again, No problem, happy to help! Cheers, Montgomery15 (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Montgomery15. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 28 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Flash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EFL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 5 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jon Harley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EFL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oliver Brown image edit

Hi. You have previously reverted the image on Oliver Brown (snooker player). You state the fact that the fact Brown is wearing a onesie is "irrelevant" or "inappropriate". This is a free image of Brown. There is no other available photographs of Brown on Wikipedia, so surely it makes sense for any image to be shown, regardless of what Brown wears. If Brown wants to wear his onesie in public places, then that is up to him. Of course it would be more logical to have one of him playing snooker but that is not available. Your argument could be applied to a number of pages, such as Elton John - his image is of him attending some event, not singing on a stage despite the fact he is a singer. I don't see the point that since Brown is a snooker player, his image must be of him playing snooker. Goodreg3 (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Seeking FA review comments for 2019 World Snooker Championship edit

Hi Montgomery, as a member of the snooker project, I wonder if you would like to contribute to the FA review that we're working on at the moment for the 2019 World Snooker Championship article? I'm co-nominator for the review (with Lee Vilenski). We're looking for constructive comments and support to move things forward. Please can you assist or are you strictly football these days!? Best wishes, Rodney Baggins (talk) 11:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 25 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clive Everton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Birch edit

 

The article Jonathan Birch has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Otr500 (talk) 14:19, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 edit

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mark Bennett (snooker player), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Otr500 (talk) 17:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of David Hall (snooker player) edit

 

The article David Hall (snooker player) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of David Hall (snooker player) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Hall (snooker player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hall (snooker player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

James Wattana has not received an invitational tour card this season edit

Hello this article refers to players that have received invitational tour cards. Jimmy already has one and Wattana has accepted one in the past. Only Doherty and Hendry have received tour cards for the coming season. there has been an article written for these two players that is sourced by World Snooker. No announcement has been made for Wattana. the article refers to the players that have received them during their careers. i hope this helps you 80.233.59.70 (talk) 10:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 80.233.59.70 (talk) 10:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please view edit

Wattana has not received an invitation tour card no announcement has been made Jimmy White alreasy had a card from last season. It speaks about previous players who have received cards. 89.204.187.223 (talk) 12:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Danny Whitaker edit

No, in hindsight I was unnecessarily rude - so apologies. GiantSnowman 17:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 8 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Shore F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenix club.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 26 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alf Patrick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EFL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deaths in 2021 edit

Hello, when you add people to the Deaths in 2021, please note that they should be in alphabetical order under each day. Please also format the references properly. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 18:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello, thanks for informing me of that, I didn't know. Have a good day! Montgomery15 (talk) 18:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paddy Browne edit

 

The article Paddy Browne has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Duncan Campbell (snooker player) edit

 

The article Duncan Campbell (snooker player) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 07:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Marcel Gauvreau edit

 

The article Marcel Gauvreau has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 05:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Graham Horne edit

 

The article Graham Horne has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 05:56, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of James Leadbetter edit

 

The article James Leadbetter has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Craig MacGillivray (snooker player) edit

 

The article Craig MacGillivray (snooker player) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Stuart Mann edit

 

The article Stuart Mann has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 03:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of David McLellan (snooker player) edit

 

The article David McLellan (snooker player) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karl Payne edit

 

The article Karl Payne has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gary Ponting edit

 

The article Gary Ponting has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dessie Sheehan edit

 

The article Dessie Sheehan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of James Tatton for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Tatton, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Tatton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shaun Mellish edit

 

The article Shaun Mellish has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Brian Salmon edit

 

The article Brian Salmon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 19:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paul Thornley edit

 

The article Paul Thornley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 19:47, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 18 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rubber (2010 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Habib Subah for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Habib Subah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habib Subah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:57, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hugh Abernethy edit

 

The article Hugh Abernethy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet notability for sports. No major wins, international wins, and article references that they were never higher than 80th in the world

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.weedle (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hugh Abernethy edit

 

The article Hugh Abernethy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 19:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paul Cavney edit

 

The article Paul Cavney has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 19:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Martin Dziewialtowski for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Dziewialtowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Dziewialtowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mark Flowerdew for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Flowerdew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Flowerdew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Phaitoon Phonbun for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phaitoon Phonbun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phaitoon Phonbun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ian Brumby for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ian Brumby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Brumby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of David McDonnell for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David McDonnell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David McDonnell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Darren Clarke (snooker player) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darren Clarke (snooker player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Clarke (snooker player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Martin Dziewialtowski" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Martin Dziewialtowski has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30 § Martin Dziewialtowski until a consensus is reached.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  01:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 24 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamie Guy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barking.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Mark Flowerdew edit

  Hello, Montgomery15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Flowerdew, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply