ooo

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, MojonLoko! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Cristabel0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to RackaRacka have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Cristabel0 (talk) 01:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nathaniel Peteru. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. RteeeeKed (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit
 

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. DanCherek (talk) 23:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, MojonLoko,
Wikipedia does not permit editors to create pages about living people that are entirely negative and insulting, especially using poor sourcing. If you want to continue editing on Wikipedia, think of contributing to existing articles or writing balanced, neutral point-of-view articles with reliable sourcing.
If you have questions about article creation, sourcing or Wikipedia policies, please bring them to the Teahaouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Missa Sinfonía

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Missa Sinfonía requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MissaSinfonia. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit