MissDiva Ari, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi MissDiva Ari! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 17:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 06:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 04:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2015 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:10, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • I've noticed that the majority of your edits has been to create a page in your userspace for a BGC spinoff that doesn't seem to actually exist. You've made some minor edits aside from that, but this looks to be your main goal. I'm sorry, but I just don't see where you're really here to contribute to Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:11, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MissDiva Ari (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The sandbox is our sandbox. Whatever is posted in that sandbox should not be deleted. I thought the sandbox was used for drafts and practicing on making real Wiki articles. It is our own account. Instead of making it public to everybody, you guys should have either a private option or just make our own rough draft space where we can see how it would look if it was a real article. Plus, I delete the contents that are in it, right after I save it and go over it so it's not like the content is there long enough for anyone to see. I just think we should have a space just for us. So we can add things and delete things to practice using Wiki.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a free webhost, you don't own any pages on Wikipedia, and I'm rather concerned by you referring to yourself as "we" and "us"; see WP:ROLE. Shared use of accounts is not permitted. Huon (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MissDiva Ari (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not sharing my account. I said "we" and "us" and "our" because I was referring to everybody in general, the people who use Wikipedia. My content is only up for like 2 seconds and then quickly taken down. I doubt that anybody can see everything in 2 seconds. I do apologize for not using Wikipedia properly and abusing my privileges. This will not happen again. I will only edit and add content that is reliable and has a valid source. Once again, my apologies.

Decline reason:

The principal problem, as Tokyogirl79 pointed out, is that the vast majority of your edits have been to create a draft page about a show called "Bad Girls Rehab: Back to ATL" which does not appear to exist. We have a very strict rule that hoax articles should not be created anywhere on Wikipedia and I will need to see some understanding of this policy before I can entertain an unblock, I'm afraid. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MissDiva Ari (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am now well aware of my mistakes and will do everything in my power to not make them again. I was just brainstorming and practicing how to use Wikipedia. Once again, my apologies. What are some ways that I can be unblocked, like what is something that I can do?

Decline reason:

Procedural decline since I'm posting the unblock below. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 12:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Well, a good way to start is by letting us know how you will edit once you're unblocked. What type of stuff do you want to do on here? Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MissDiva Ari (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well I mostly want to like fix up any articles that have some errors, more specifically, reality show articles. Like adding premiere dates, fixing up cast lists, and episodes and things like that, so that when people go to search that specific show, they are not greeted with false information. I know that sounds contradicting to what I was just doing recently with the whole Bad Girls Rehab thing but I've learned now.

Accept reason:

You seem to be genuine enough to where I feel like you should be unblocked, but I am obligated to warn you that if you make similar pages again, you'll likely be reblocked with little chance at another unblock. I don't want to sound overly harsh, but I do want to make sure that you're aware of this. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 12:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MissDiva Ari (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am well aware of the consequences now and will assure you that it will no longer happen. Thank you so much! And once again, I do apologize.

Decline reason:

You are already unblocked. Have a nice day. HighInBC 17:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MissDiva Ari (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Are there ways for me to use my content and practice without anybody seeing it? If there is no way, will not post the content but I was just curious.

Decline reason:

You are not blocked, so please stop posting unblock templates. To answer your question, no, Wikipedia does not host any private user space that cannot be seen by everyone. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox edit

 

A tag has been placed on User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 06:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm surprised that you've placed a fake TV show in your sandbox after claiming you've learned your lesson and User:Tokyogirl79 unblocked you with a stern admonishment to not do this again. -- Whpq (talk) 06:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox edit

  User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MissDiva Ari/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • @Xaosflux: I've changed this block to an indefinite. Part of the requirement with their prior unblock was that they would not create any more hoax material on Wikipedia. Which appears to be one of the very first things that they did when they were unblocked. That they did this so quickly shows that a month's block will not deter them, as they were made pretty clear from the last indef that this wasn't acceptable... yet they did it again. Ari, I hate to sound harsh but your chances of getting a second unblock are pretty much zero at this point in time, as I doubt that any other admin would unblock you given that you've clearly shown that you cannot be trusted. Wikipedia is not a place to create hoax articles in your userspace. You claimed that this was for practice and you were told that this was still unacceptable. I'm sorry, but any unblock requests at this point in time will be a waste of your time and ours, so I'm just going to cut to the chase and withdraw talk page access. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
    @Tokyogirl79: No objections, thanks for the note. — xaosflux Talk 05:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply