Welcome!

edit

Hello, Misantropileño, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nikki Vianna, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nikki Vianna

edit
 

The article Nikki Vianna has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, im working in that article, sorry for upload in construction. Misantropileño (talk) 20:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nikki Vianna for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Vianna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Vianna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ks0stm (TCGE) 21:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Helbiz

edit

Constructive criticism: You really should have done something else instead of just reverting these changes. I've put in a request to protect the page from IP vandalism and placed a l4 warning on the page. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I got tired of explaining to the Ukrainian that this is not the way to publish on wikipedia, if he wants to do a complaint, he needs quality links that make up a compelling story, apparently he is behind the creation of a defamatory page, the page copies real news and uses it to reference paragraphs of the content https://hbznews.com (russian page), it is a sistematic attack of hate and harassment, if it is real what he says he need to prove it but not in the way he does. Its a good idea to protect the page, ask to protect Palella too Misantropileño (talk) 00:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Demetrius Watkins (December 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Misantropileño! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 03:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Demetrius Watkins

edit

  Hello, Misantropileño. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Demetrius Watkins, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Demetrius Watkins

edit
 

Hello, Misantropileño. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Demetrius Watkins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply