Migdiachinea

Mig (talk) 20:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Mig (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC)==Welcome!==

Hello, Migdiachinea, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --evrik 19:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

https://vimeo.com/391720479 Password WIRHD

Can’t edit.

Cannot read messages or edit

Talk page

Dear Drmies. I request to be unblocked as it is an unfair thing to do. The Slamdance FF Wikipedia page looked more like a publicity ad than the page of a professional film festival. I explained over and over what the issue was. No one has responded. Indeed Wikipedia is an encyclopedic source that I use for my own research. But it’s wrong to use it to publicize and aggrandize yourself without regard to truth. I am a truth seeker. Also I pointed out that the festival is used by its well-connected founders to promote their own films making it difficult for minority indie filmmakers to gain access. I don’t believe that Slamdance FF has ever had a minority filmmaker selected to it. Much less a minority woman. To be quiet is to be complicit. I still have wrist issues. Thank you. Mig Mig (talk) 20:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Mig (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

your image question

Replied at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Calliopejen1 03:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

El Super

OK, I see what you meant. I've restored El Super and built it into a useful article. No problem! Dlh-stablelights 22:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

I thank you, sir or madam. Life is tough for women filmmakers because, for instance, all the things I've done for the guys have never been returned in kind -- on the contrary, they've tried to destroy me. But I get my rewards from other sources -- that's how Karmic Law works. Mig 15:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Orlando Jiménez-Leal

A tag has been placed on Orlando Jiménez-Leal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dlh-stablelights 20:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

SorryMig 22:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments in the ES Wikipedia

Discussion of "Búsqueda".

Do you mean that you cant find the article of you? Thats because there isnt any. Else I dont know what you mean. Canislupusarctos 16:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations

An article about you now appears in the French Wikipedia: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migdia_Chinea-Varela -- Rob C. alias Alarob 23:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, Rob -- I sent you a message to your page. Mig 16:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Your comments on my username's frontpage.

I have expressed my views on the subject before to, please, keep the Cuban Americans page because at the very least, it helps with research -- which is what Wikipedia is all about. I started doing research on a poet listed on this page based on the fact that it was there -- as prior to that I never even knew she'd existed. Mig 15:56, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Greetings, friend, you commented this on my username's frontpage which I haven't started on yet. I think you are trying to comment on this page about AfD for "List of Cuban Americans" Please post there on their petition board about keeping the List of Cuban Americans category not my username's frontpage. If you want to talk to me or discuss other things with me, then use my talk board not my front page:

User talk:Pilot expert

Thank you! --Pilot expert 05:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Why?

You could have cut down parts of the 2nd and 3rd sections on this.Kfc1864 talk _{my edits} 13:39, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

What are sections 2nd and 3rd? Not the historical component, I hope. Mig 13:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Mig, Kfc1864 has nominated your userpage for deletion; please see here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Migdiachinea. Please comment if you wish. In the meanwhile, I have restored an earlier version of your page because of copyright concerns and because Wikipedia is not an archive service or a web hosting facility. Please review guidelines for userpages. Please understand that userpages still belong to Wikipedia and are only made available to editors to assist them in their work on the project and to facilitate communication with other editors, and it really is not appropriate to use Wikipedia as a free web-hosting and archiving facility. If you require a free web-hosting facility, we can recommend some free webspace providers where you would be free to archive all of this information, the letters and notes and such as you wish. If the material is related to your work on Wikipedia, you could place a link on your userpage to your webspace, but it is not appropriate to try to host it all on Wikipedia. I hope you understand this, so we can close the request to delete your userpage. Thanks, Sarah 16:45, 4 October 2007 (UTC

Okay, Sarah -- I wasn't using it as a host page. Just informational. I don't have any such pages. This is My Talk. This is okay, right?

Now it's OK. Your userpage and talk page are safe for now.Kfc1864 talk _{my edits} 04:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanx -- please let me know (in a simple way) what is allowed and what isn't. Kindest regards -- Mig 12:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

The LAUSD comments

I linked to the article at WorldNet Daily :) WhisperToMe (talk) 00:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

By the way, here is a nice article about a teacher who taught at Berendo MS in LAUSD for awhile: [1] - this was in the 1990s, but I doubt much has changed. Geib was never severely attacked, but he felt like a failure even with his efforts and eventually quit. WhisperToMe (talk) 09:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Spanish Wikipedia

Have you tried writing an article about yourself in the Spanish Wikipedia? No, I simply posted a letter in Spanish in my User's or Discussion Page. Oh, I missed your question -- should I write one? I don't have a Spanish-language program. For my published letter to our President, I had to make some creative incredible hulkess moves to get the appropriate accents on top of vowels. Mig 17:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Mig 04:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You may want to try a magnet school or a school in an exclusive area such as Pacific Palisades HS, Sherman Oaks CES, Los Angeles CES, etc. WhisperToMe 20:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

BTW, on your qestion above -- LAUSD wants to finish me off. Mig 08:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Your talk page

Anyone may edit any comments in the talk page, just like in an article talk page. Of course, you are free to revert messages in it too. Just make sure that nobody edits what you say, and you should be fine. Check out Wikipedia:Talk pages and Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, which give guidelines on the use of talk pages :) WhisperToMe (talk) 04:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for responding so quickly. Mig 04:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, if you know Spanish, it would be nice to have an article written in Spanish :) - Regarding entering diacritics, you may use the Windows "Character Map" to input them - I know there are keyboard shortcuts, but I am not sure about how to use them. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanx, Whispertome, for the diacritic tips -- that's a $50.00 word, fer sure. I know most of the Spanish grammatical rules just from reading in Spanish and applying. I will try to handle the task when I'm feeling better. Regards on the first day of Chanukah Mig 16:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy New Year to All

Mig 00:15, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Mig 02:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Dear WhisperToMe (talk): I consider my being on Wikipedia a privilege for which I'm honored. That being said, if I have something to say on any subject, I say so in an article somewhere and I sign my name to it. Whatever small edits I have done here and there, I also sign my name. I was, thus, wondering if within your high-tech level of WP knowledge, you may be able to tell which computer the LAUSD comments came from? I have never discussed my password with anyone at all, in fact, I have since the incident changed my password. I am, however, concerned that someone with a high level of computer sophistication may be watching me closely and hacking my password at whim. And that this spammer, in question, may use me as a tool to further his/her cause, whatever that may be. Please, let me know. In the meantime have a very Happy New First Day of 2008.Mig 21:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Figuring out where the LAUSD comments came from

Mrs. Chinea, you will have to ask a Wikipedia:Developer that question - Regular users and sysops alone cannot determine the IP address of a registered user (including yourself and the person who pretended to be you).

Anyhow, I would suggest avoiding using your account while on public computers and checking your own computer for keyloggers. Wikipedia has a technique to disable "brute force" password crackers (The "repeat the words in this image" trick), so if someone repeatedly finds your passwords, it could be due to a keylogger. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanx, WhisperToMe for your response and I will take appropriate measures to see if I learn more about what happened and how to identify the hacker. I used my account here while I was working at LAUSD, but have never used a "public" computer. I wonder if the problem comes from LAUSD, given the rage I've seen and the subject matter. Oh, BTW, I'm "Ms." because Chinea is my dad's family name. Thanx for addressing me so respectfully, however. Mig 01:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandals

Ah, my school in HISD had some holiday thieves - they weren't as outrageous as the ones in the article, and they seemed pretty stupid. They stole a laptop for a handicapped girl and an older computer but they didn't take a newer computer. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Gee, a handicapped girl. But taking an old computer instead of the newer one tells me that they're totally illiterate, as well as dishonest, about these things. Figures. Mig 05:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, think of whether it's a legitimate phone message or some prankster who wants a laugh. From my understand I suspect the latter... I don't personally know you nor do I know your situation. Anyhow, if you feel that the warnings are legitimate, then I would contact a police agency - Which one, I don't know. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleted info -- --Mig 03:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the ED link - I referenced it here - School violence WhisperToMe (talk) 20:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, WhisperToMe (talk) Gosh, thanx -- here are some websites you may already know about that have 2005 information. http://nces.ed.gov/index.asp http://www.laspd.com/newcrimebyschool.asp http://www.cahro.org/html/lausd_procedures.html I didn't know any of this. Did you see my WND interview? --Mig 22:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

• I'll see how I can properly mention his name :) WhisperToMe (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

We thank you!! Mig 17:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)--Mig 17:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

It may sound odd, but that is the principal's counter-argument, as stated in the article. A legal court has not ruled on the matter yet. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:32, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, WhisperToMe I saw that. But since the case has not been decided, my benefit of the doubt would fall with the teacher. The district will "write teachers up" for calling security during a melee instead of containing the classroom themselmes, for example. It sucks. Beto seeems like such a creative teacher -- and there are precious few of those left around. Regards -- Mig 14:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)--Mig 14:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

White Hispanic, signature

"bad day".
Yeah, I figured that ... As for your signature, make sure that you're using four tildes and not five; that might be it. Well, good luck. SamEV (talk) 02:34, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Wow, still having signature trouble? Click on "my preferences" and clear the Signature box if there's anything in it; also uncheck the "Raw signature" box, if it's currently checked of course. If that still doesn't do it, ask the experts here. Good luck again. SamEV (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I unchecked the "signature box." Thanx -- why is it always the small things? Mig 01:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Marking Castro's Stepping Down From Power - February 19, 2008

Castro steps down.

After 50 years of communist dictatorship, I tend to think that the island will move to the future eventually and in that regard there's much to do. It's the glass half-full. Therefore, I feel bittersweet about the news. The practical Cuban infrastructure (streets, electrical, architecture, plumbing, etc., etc., etc.,), is mostly gone -- whereas a strong government-based legacy of repression and political infrastructure remains. Cuban-exiles, the least understood of all U.S. ethnic minorities, and their Cuban-American offspring everywhere in the world, would be right to respond cautiously to all the rhetoric that will surely follow.

It's probably a good time to get some guava pastries at some local Cuban bakery and have a quiet private celebration -- I'm having half a glass of wine.

Love to all --

Migdia Chinea --

Image

I it is not possible for you to delete an image but I can do so because I am an administrator. Let me see about the image uploads and see if I can find any redundancies. :) WhisperToMe (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

• EDIT: It seems like you uploaded both instances to the same location so I don't think there is a need to delete any instances of the image. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Blacklist

Users are not placed on blacklists - links are.

The blacklist notice should state which link is offending - You can remove it, comment it out (Surround it with <!-- on the first side and --> on the second), or put nowiki on it. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:32, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Do you have a screenshot of the error message? WhisperToMe (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

The page said that lulu . com was blacklisted. There was no blacklist attempt against you. What happened is that a previous post had lulu.com and that was added to the spam filter. In other words, an edit would not pass UNLESS the edit included a nowiki, a comment out, or removal of the lulu link. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

You didn't do anything wrong. You weren't intending to spam - See, it just happens that the URL was blacklisted long after you posted it - The thing is that nobody would be able to post on that talk page until the blacklist URL was dealt with. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Someone added it to a URL blacklist. I forget where it is but I know Wikipedia keeps a list of URLs to blacklist. Regarding small text, I'll have to see. - it's probably due to a <small> without a corresponding </small> WhisperToMe (talk) 18:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Lemme see if I can fix the section - In the meantime it's not a good idea to post large chunks of newspaper articles like that, as they are copyrighted. Also, we can only report on the tort letter thing once it becomes a legal case documented in the media. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay. Can you post a link to the article? My letter is not yet in the media, so you're right. I posted it out of anger at their denial, for example, "teaching" Mandarin when the students cannot even write English. Everyone already knows that a huge percentage of students are not graduating at all and will probably rely on criminality and welfare to survive -- all according to news reports world wide. Regards and much love and thanx -- Mig (talk) 21:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC) http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-principal13mar13,0,5522349.story -This is the link to the article I was talking about - It has two pages. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Yes. I know the article and the man himself. That's the school where I was assulted. I warned the District and it ignored me -- like they do everyone. Mig (talk) 22:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

French article

Thanks for the link to the French article linking to Migdia Chinea Varela. I moved the link from "External links" to the left-hand column under "languages," where links to other Wikipedias go. I'll also make sure the French article links to English Wikipedia. -- ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 22:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi Rob -- where are the languages? Mig (talk) 23:23, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Look in the left-hand column under the Wikipedia globe. When an article has a counterpart on another Wikipedia, it will appear at the bottom of the column under the heading "languages."

This is done by adding code at the end of the article. For Migdia Chinea Varela I added [[fr:Migdia Chinea-Varela]], and the French article has [[en:Migdia Chinea Varela]]. -- ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 18:03, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Duh! Thanx for the explanation -- I never saw that! Double duh! There's also one in Spanish, BTW, but it's not as nice as the one in French. Seeing me in French makes me want to jump on a plane and go. Mig -- Mig (talk) 22:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Huh, I couldn't find one on the Spanish 'Pedia. I did google the others, and found your name on the Italian 'Pedia with three articles on Episodi di l'Incredible Hulk. :-) -- ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 22:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm criss-crossing the world! Let me see if I find the Spanish thing. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Migdiachinea Uhmmm -- hay que borrar esto en cuanto sea leido. Mig (talk) 22:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Editing the article

I don't expect the biographical info you added to be removed, but if it is, it will probably be because it is not "reliably sourced." That is, it has to be published somewhere reliable. There’s more about it at WP:RS.

Hope you are doing OK these days. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 19:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

It's about my grandfather. There's not much known here about that stuff behind the sugar cane curtain. I'll see if I can get a separate source. So much to do, though. Have been accepted into the UCLA Theater, Film and TV for my Masters. Thanx so much for asking -- regards and forgiveness. M --

("The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth.") —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.132.102 (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The Cuban government never responded to my query. I have a picture of my grandfather in full military regalia, which attests to his charge. But unless I do the research in Miami, I don't believe the Cuban government will be very helpful in this case. How do you post a picture here? --Mig (talk) 16:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Josie's eye.png

Thanks for uploading File:Josie's eye.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

These images belong to me and I've requested a copyright under federal copyright law. However, it's been months and I've yet to receive it. I'm the film 's director, producer, writer, editor, etc. It's my film.

Thank you all --

Mig (talk) 04:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC) )

October 2011

Hello Migdiachinea. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

Hi -- I added some images and information that belong to me and only I can provide.

Thank you --Mig (talk) 14:17, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. DreamGuy (talk) 14:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Dreamguy -- other people are constructing the "anonymous (street meat)" page. I've just provided information about the images, festivals and copyright. Thank you -- Mig (talk) 14:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Photo copyrights

I have undone your edit at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Please read the page again, as it is telling you how to send evidence of permission by email. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:00, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

migdia chinea

The notability of this page has never been in question -- I was the first Hispanic woman to join the Wruiters Guild of America, west -- and have other firsts. Thank you.Mig (talk) 15:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey

Hi Migdiachinea!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 06:20, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Conflict of interest and autobiography

Hello Migdiachinea. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Anonymous (Street Meat), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Please heed the warning given above; Wikipedia is not here for you to publicize yourself, your films, etc. --Orangemike (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Dear Orange Mike -- although it is my film, I think it's a subject that is timely with humanistic values. The quality of the film is excellent and it's been selected to 24 film festivals worldwide. Of note, is the fact that no one at UCLA had been able to accomplish this while a student at UCLA -- hence their Bruin article. So it attests as to the value of the production and the subject-matter. This is not publicity because all of what has already been accomplished has been accomplished without Wikipedia. I'm being interviewed for the HP this morning. Thank you for your comments and support. Mig (talk) 16:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Please can you supply a reference for the "honorable mention" as the one supplied does not support it and without it the article would fail WP:Notability Kind regards.Theroadislong (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

from California Int'l Shorts Festival info@calshorts.com toMigdia Chinea <migdia.chinea@deletedemailaddress.com>

dateWed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:06 PM subjectRe: Need Film Festival Logos Important mainly because it was sent directly to you.

hide details Aug 10

Hello Migdia,

We've attached our festival logo and your honorable mention laurel to this message. Have a wonderful day.

Best, Tim

Mig (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

ANONYMOUS (STREET MEAT)

THIS PAGE IS LEGITIMATE. Why is it being taken down bit bit? I have contacted the California International Film Festival for verification by email from them directly. Where can this email be submitted? It's possible that something went wrong with their page. My film is in their archives. Mig (talk) 21:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Please have a look at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Information in Wikipedia articles must already have been published in sources such as books, newspapers and respected online news sources. If the information can only be verified by emailing someone, then it cannot be posted in an article; there is no system here for submission of facts by email.

You can help to improve the Anonymous (Street Meat) article by finding news coverage about the film. Did any news media report on the "Honorable Mention"? If they did, please post it on the article talk page - publication name, date, page number, URL if available. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

(later)

Comments like this one won't win you any friends here. Please refer to Wikipedia:No personal attacks.

Why are you so keen to have Saturday Night Special (film) cleaned up? I doubt if the editors working on Anonymous (Street Meat) have even noticed that article - there are over 3.7 million articles at Wikipedia to work on, after all. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

That other short is the example I've seen and it's so blatant. That's why. No there are no articles that I recall about the California International Film Festival because there was little or no publicity that I recall. I've asked its director to verify. I have the "Honorable Mention" logo, which they sent to me from their email address and I've selected, copied and pasted here with so-so results. I am unable AND disinterested in manipulating stuff. If there are 3.7 million articles, as you've pointed out, why are you being so nitpicky about this one item that I've tried to verify in several different ways? I mean, I have sent emails to Wikipedia commons and attachments -- I don't know what you want from me that you apparently do not expect from others. So is this ABOUT ME? Can you tell me why you're dismantling "anonymous (street meat)" bit by bit? I think it's unfair that I'm called to defend personal attacks when people are ganging up on me and calling me a liar just as I'm trying -- with limited expertise -- to comply with a request. I'm a real human being with feelings and you're singling me out. Mig (talk) 21:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

I thank you for your help. The Huffington Post article about "anonymous (street meat)" and the banks will be published around Nov. 1st. If any of this is still up, I'll link it. Meanwhile, my stomach hurts. My intentions are honorable. It's a good film and it's going to be exposed to more publicity once the Huffington Post article comes out and the film is selected to various cause festivals. I thank you for your trouble as I move on. Kind regards, Mig (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Anonymous (Street Meat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anonymous (Street Meat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonymous (Street Meat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FunkyCanute (talk) 12:57, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

KEEP anonymous (street meat)

Dear friends -- the image of the eye was restored (gun image was not) -- all images are available in "anonymous (street meat)" Google images, please, take a look. https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#inbox/132e812637a7fb8e

However, the file was truncated. Here's an example of different treatment -- the short "Saturday Evening Special" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Special_(film).

Meranwhile, I was interviewed by someone from the Huffington Post yesterday. The interview centered on my inspiration for "anonymous (street meat)" -- a 2-year ordeal with Bank of America. With demonstrations and movements like "Occupy Wall Street" going on against Wall Street and the too-big-to-fail banks, thet script for "anonymous (street meat)" was ahead of time by having a plot that dealt with bank abuse with harrowing images. That's why the film has been well received at festivals abroad -- in Seoul Korea, for one, it was screened in over 14,000 monitors throughout the city. The HP article will link up to "anonymous (street meat)" and it's schedule for publication on November 1st, or earlier.

The articles on the Daily Bruin and the upcoming one on the Huffington Post are of relevancy socio-politically, so it's not without importance. The Bruin article itself is not quoted, but if anyone reads it, they can see that the short has social significance because its conception came out of issues that are being in the country's political sphere right now -- events that occurred to me. But it appears that people delete without first reading or considering. The fact that I'm a Hispanic woman is alone of some note because I'm part of a tiny minority of filmmakers. That I'm a female professional screenwriter of Hispanic background who returned to UCLA for a Master's after working as a professional for years may also be interesting to some historians. I, personally, would be interested in reading a Wikipedia page about a notable Eskimo female filmmaker with a short in 24 film festivals and in some similar circumstances, for example. If there are any.

Here's one instance used as an example of editorial bias: The Saturday Night Special Wikipedia page, for one, doesn't have any references -- it is instead laudatory of that film to the point that when I happened upon it, I was surprised to see that and tried to flag it for an edit, not a deletion, an edit. Some people here have defended that film and reinstate it. Additionally, that page quotes from articles that are not linked. And even if they were linked, why quote stuff that reads like a publicity page.

"anonymous (street meat)" is important and should be maintained for the reference of other Latino and/or women filmmakers, as well as the general public at large.

Thank you for your support in this endeavor --

Kind regards, Mig (talk) 16:24, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Have you read through [[2]] I think it might help you to understand the problems you are having keeping the article. You might also be interested to see that Saturday Night Special (film) has been nominated for deletion. All good wishesTheroadislong (talk) 16:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Understood

Dear theroadislong:

I think that when the Huffington Post article comes out, it will give it further historical context -- already discussed in the Bruin piece. Please, note that nothing from the Bruin article was quoted on the Wikipedia page. That all I tried to do was clarify the text in an objective -- not editorial -- manner. That nothing was submitted prior to the film being selected to numerous festivals. That I have not benefitted in any way from the film being here. But if anyone out there looks up Hispanic filmmakers, it would be nice that they could see there's a woman laboring in the filed and that her film had socio-political relevance. "Saturday Night Special" with all due respect and in my humble opinion, has no social relevancy -- it doesn't break any ground. It's a commercial venture with a Wikipedia page written for the purpose of publicizing its fimmaker. For that purpose, there are other venues.

You know, the people who break ground for others are worthy of note. I could name a few that come to mind -- and these have often been people who were not in and of themselves famous or accomplished. These are ordinary people who do things before anyone else and against the tide of indifference or discrimination -- usually both -- and facilitate the efforts of others who will follow. They are called trail blazers for that reason.

Thank you and have a great day -- Mig (talk) 17:14, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

FYI, Saturday Night Special (film) was deleted. It went through the AfD process a few years ago and was deleted. It was recreated afterward with no substantial change, so it was deleted again. For your film, please see WP:GNG. There needs to be significant coverage from numerous reliable sources about the film. The Bruin piece is not enough. Erik (talk | contribs) 03:39, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I know what you're saying Erik. There will be an article on the Huffinton Post in a couple of weeks, which may trigger more articles and I don't know what's out there from the festivals because they're all different countries in various languages. I thank you for your contribution. I'm making a film "Ninth Floor" which takes on where "anonymous (street meat)" left off. I need to put a lot of my effort in that -- even if sleep is coming as a luxury these days and I'm rarely able to get any rest. Kind regards -- Mig (talk) 04:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Small Edit In Your Userpage

I have done a small edit in your userpage. There was a notice: ''Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{Reflist}} template or a <references /> tag'';, I have added the reflist in the page. Since it is not a Wikipedia article, and a userpage, you may revert the change if you think you don't need it there. Thanks! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 04:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Saturday Night Special

I saw your message at Talk:Saturday Night Special (film) and replied there. I don't know whether you saw the reply, but as the page was tagged for deletion I kept a copy so that I could post it here if need be:

I suspect that the difference between this article and Anonymous (Street Meat) is that Wikipedia has better systems in place today for reviewing new articles than it did back in 2007. That's only a guess, because I only started editing seriously in 2010. This article slipped through in 2007 and hasn't attracted much attention until now. There's no deliberate "double standard"; it wasn't "allowed to remain", it just wasn't noticed.

This article, Saturday Night Special (film) could still be rescued and expanded if it turns out that the subject has been written about in reliable sources, enough to show that the film passes WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Then the unsourced stuff could be stripped out and a sourced, quality article written instead.

The same goes for Anonymous (Street Meat) and any other film article you care to name. If your film attracts enough media attention to pass WP:NFILM then I expect someone will re-create the article. (But as I've mentioned before, articles are not normally written by the film's creator because of the conflict of interest).

-- John of Reading (talk) 06:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: migdia chinea

Hello, Migdiachinea. You have new messages at Cloveapple's talk page.
Message added 08:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Misplaced edit

Quite by accident, it's me again. I have undone your edit at Help:Using talk pages. I assume you meant to put this on the talk page of a film article somewhere; you actually edited one of the help pages. An easy slip to make! -- John of Reading (talk) 16:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

about Anonymous (Street Meat)

After disussion the article was deleted for not (currently) meeting notability standards. Do not be disheartened. IF you contact User:BigDom on his talk page and make the request, he will be glad to place it in your userspace User:Migdiachinea/workspace/Anonymous (Street Meat) so that you an continue work, get input from other editors, and have it ready for the expceted new sources when they become available. And when you feel it is ready for a return to article space, ask User:BigDom to look at it and he can judge its readiness. Do not just move it back to article without seeking input from him. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Migdiachinea. You have new messages at MichaelQSchmidt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

And be sure to ask BigDom to userfy your article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Migdiachinea. You have new messages at MichaelQSchmidt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Migdiachinea. You have new messages at MichaelQSchmidt's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Josie.pdf listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Josie.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution IRC office hours.

Hello there. As you expressed interest in hearing updates to my research in the dispute resolution survey that was done a few months ago, I just wanted to let you know that I am hosting an IRC office hours session this coming Saturday, 28th July at 19:00 UTC (approximately 12 hours from now). This will be located in the #wikimedia-office ^connect IRC channel - if you have not participated in an IRC discussion before you can connect to IRC here.

Regards, User:Szhang (WMF) (talk) 07:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Editing your own article

I'm afraid I have removed the extra material that you added at Migdia Chinea Varela, as it was not backed up by any reliable, published sources. Information in Wikipedia articles must be linked to published sources so that readers can, at least in theory, check it for themselves. Please also review the message at #Conflict of interest and autobiography, further up this page. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC) yes. thank you -- too much going on.  :( get carried away by life events Mig (talk) 22:11, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Mig (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

There's lots of stuff that is backed up by professional information and articles, as I'm an outspoken person. However, because the material is not well-researched, as it should, it appears one-sided and that is NOT fair to me. There's more to my life and my interests -- qualities and ambitions -- than a lawsuit in which I was not the only person involved and which was ignited on principle -- the principle of equal work for equal pay and the notion that setting aside half-pay by virtue of ethnicity is simply wrong. I received nothing as a result -- not a dime. Instead, I was blacklisted. Please, understand that that unless coverage is made fair to me as a human being, what is there appears biased and I can't have it. I work too hard and have sacrificed too much for that -- thank you and kindest regards -- Mig (talk) 16:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Migdia Chinea Varela, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Migdia Chinea Varela, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Migdiachinea. You have new messages at John of Reading's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- John of Reading (talk) 17:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Migdia Chinea Varela may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanx BracketBot -- please, don't date incorrect and hurtful. Thanx for discretion. Mig (talk) 02:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello again! BracketBot is a robot - it doesn't do "discretion". But I have fixed the unbalanced bracket that it was trying to tell you about. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Mig (talk) 06:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC) This is sort of funny - thanx :)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Migdia Chinea Varela may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Migdia Chinea-Varela''' (a.k.a. '''Migdia Chinea''', is a [[Cuban-American]] [[screenwriter]]. She was a writer for the TV

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Migdia Chinea

page being vandalized by a Timmy43 -- not a user, a vandal. Please place a lock on the page!

"A harmless drudge"

I've removed your comment from John of Reading, because that page, without a "User:" or "User talk:" prefix, is the encyclopedia article about the theologian. But, to answer your question, the phrase was originally used by Samuel Johnson; it's mentioned in the Wikipedia article "A Dictionary of the English Language". -- John of Reading (talk) 16:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC) Ok. I think I remember the reference. More like a Gollum. Well. Thanx -- Mig (talk) 16:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

COI notice

Hello, Migdiachinea. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Migdia Chinea Varela, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not write or add to an article Migdia Chinea Varela. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Delete Page

I'm being railroaded due do poor editing skills. I ask you to delete the Migdia Chinea page if you will persist in adding incorrect or harmful information on it. I'm on survival mode with no job and have NO time to be familiarizing myself with extensive and confusing protocol. I ask you to remove this page. Thank you. Mig (talk) 14:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but we don't do that. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Migdia Chinea Varela, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

I'm being railroaded due do poor editing or skills. I ask you to delete the Migdia Chinea page if you will persist in putting incorrect or harmful information on it. I'm on survival mode with no job and have NO time to be familiarizing myself with extensive and confusing protocol. I ask you to remove this page. Thank you. Mig (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Migdia, sorry for the trouble this is causing to you. Wikipedia usually does not delete pages on request of an article subject, and it looks dimly on editors editing pages about themselves. If you wish deletion to be sought, your best bet is convincing some experienced editor to file a discussion at Articles for Deletion. Beware however that it is by no means guaranteed that the article will be deleted after that -it depends on the consensus of editors there. Hope it helps. --Cyclopia^talk 15:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

That won't be necessary as an administrator Gamaliel has handled this issue and it's all good. Mig (talk) 21:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Thanx. I need all my time to take care of serious issues.

October 2013

Please do not use IMDb as a source and please do not edit an article about yourself. Instead, if you want something in the article, please put your request on the article's talk page, providing a reference to a reliable source.

To make sure it doesn't just languish there, I'd be happy to review anything you put on the talk page and try to either insert it or try to explain why I can't.

I've got the article listed on my watchlist, which notifies me when a change is made to the article or it's talk page. But if you want to put a note on my talk page, too, when you've made such a request, I'd be cool with that.

For "Director", reliable sources would be articles about a movie or movies you've directed, appearing in a reputable newspaper(s) or periodical(s). http://dailybruin.com/2011/05/25/grad_student_midgia_chinea039s_film_039anonymous_street_meat039_selected_for_cannes_short_film_festi/ I've directed this one and three others. http://www.polishfilmla.org/wocms.php?siteID=13&ID=636 -- all I did is update the entry -- this is NOT an article to which I've made edits. Thank you so much -- Mig (talk) 19:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. We're really not out to make your life more difficult. Just to follow our rules. David in DC (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC) I guess that it's not ok for a woman to be a director -- that's what I see - unless she's validated, not by her work and/or the festivals in which her work is exhibited at great cost to those people who do that, nor even the article written about her, or the websites (to which she has no access) in which she's mentioned. It's not ok for that woman to be a director -- regardless of having spent three and a half years in an institution of higher learning getting her MFA in film at astronomical expense. No. Unless there's a churri burri article by some approved periodical (not the bruin) in which it's said that she's a director VERBATIM, her work DOES NOT COUNT and SHE IS NOT A DIRECTOR!!! Thank you and kind regards Mig (talk) 20:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC) . I now know the score. Thank you.

The Bruin article was already in the sources, but I've used it as reference for some additional facts, including "director". I also used the HuffPo piece for some additional facts, and added some film festival programs as refs for both Street Meat and "Kninth Floor". Finally, I put a tag at the top of the page to remind people leave unsourced derogatory info out and asking for help referencing additional facts. I hope you find the reslting page an improvement.David in DC (talk) 01:02, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi David -- yes, I saw it. Thank you. I'm waiting to hear from other festivals regarding my new film "Old Havana..." which was screened recently at the PFF. I'm moving totally into production, so I have left certain other activities behind in history dust. We'll see what shakes. I hate derogatory stuff -- usually not based on facts and only intended to demean me. Arrgggg. It's like they're watching in dark corners and waiting to pounce. Thanx again :). Mig (talk) 01:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I forgot to make a small correction. The polish FF screening of "Kninth Floor" was in 2012. In 2013 (two weeks ago) they screened my film "Old Havana..." Cinematography by Maks Naporiwski. Full title available on their site. http://www.polishfilmla.org/wocms.php?siteID=12&ID=713 Please delete after reviewing. Thank you so much! Mig (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Mig (talk) 17:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Date correction, please. Thank you kindly --Mig (talk) 17:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

User page vs article

WP protocol asks that if a userpage contains article information, which is then turned into, or incorporated into, an actual article, that the article info on the user page be removed, as it becomes increasingly out of step with the article. I wanted to give you a heads up on this. If you dont respond after a while (maybe a month), i may blank the info and leave the link that i provided, to your article. you can definitely write about yourself on your userpage, but it cant appear to be overly promotional (like a resume), and should not follow article style. I dont recommend you edit your own article, but if you wanted to seriously revamp it, you would make a copy of at at your Sandbox, and work on it there-but this could also be blanked if you left it there too long without working on it. This is not meant as a warning, but as friendly advice. userpages look better to the average reader if they focus on your interests at WP. I would gather a good example is User:Jimbo Wales. And, i will now take the time to actually read your article, and familiarize myself with your professional work, as i came here from editing around Luis J. Rodriguez (the politican/writer), and his talk page.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

French WP talk page

the talk page at your french WP article contains a letter, apparently written to a newspaper. If this was published in a newspaper, you (or the newspaper) maintain copyright, i believe, and thus it should NOT be reproduced at the talk page in full. the letter begins:

"Neither tacos nor brie"

New York Times columnist Judith Warner said (No Laughing Matter, Sept. 11, 2008), "In Republican crowds, I find, I feel particularly small. And dark."

and ends:

This exclusivity of thought is a form of intellectual assault, people. Neither tacos nor brie.

If you wish this to not be released under a free license, you can request the material be deleted.

PS. i watched the Kninth Floor at Vimeo. I liked the dialogue between the old man and the young woman: excellent depiction of what could either be the truth, or a schizophrenic person-have you met anyone who is schizophrenic? i also liked the images of the two latino men in the elevator, very striking. I had trouble following the story, but im getting older and avant garde film expression is probably harder for me to follow. I havent yet watched the "old havana" clip. I added a little bit to your article, and added an english language wikiquote page. I'm sorry your experience here has been somewhat unpleasant. I know we can get pretty testy when people edit their own article, but that shouldnt excuse rudeness or hostility.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

More nonsense

I took the liberty of rewriting your userpage, based on your "thanking" me for my comments above. I know its your page, but i wanted to offer my knowledge of proper userpage formatting. please alter as you wish.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:56, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Bold textHi Mercury -- thanks for your advice -- :) there are updates to my career, but I can't update my page. I'll be traveling to Cannes in May to promote my new film a short in competition there "Old Havana and the Great Pimp of San Isidro", Screened at the Polish Film Festival, now in preproduction as "The Prince of Old Havana" -- please review my website under construction theprinceofoldhavana.com Thanks again! (was unable to save this to your talk page -- but if I did, please delete) M Mig (talk) 21:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

I will check out the site, and i will add information to your article as it becomes notable. hopefully, your feature film will be received well enough to warrant an article. I dont get to decide, the world decides by writing about it. I don't know why I adopt some articles to work on, its sort of random, but for now im focussing a bit on yours, hope its done well.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I corrected a couple of errors on my own message. E.g., theprinceofoldhavana.com -- everything has been so much work. But I hope you visit the site, the teaser there will have a narration and everything will be art directed and refined. I am volunteering at UCLA's AAP as a creative writing mentor and will be in a panel of experts there in May designed to increased awareness of the "benefits" of higher education by those who have actually endured it -- MFAs and PhDs in various disciplines. Thanks so much for your interest in my small world.  :) M --Mig (talk) 02:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC).

Polish Film Festival link re:  "Old Havana. ..." 

http://www.polishfilmla.org/wocms.php?siteID=12&ID=713Mig (talk) 20:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Update

for ease of editing, i will respond to your comments on my talk page.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

important notice (not bad) there now.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Mercurywoodrose@yahoo.com.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Some Tortas Fritas for you

Thanks. This week, i needed a little boost, with an editing issue with another editor bugging me. nice to know im appreciated.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC) (ps: if you know of a bakery that makes these in the bay area, or even LA, let me know, they look really good. i did find one image of a cuban pastry at the commons, but it was partly eaten)

Thanks!! I will check it out. Have a great weekend !!!  :) mig

Portal

I had added your article to the "Did You Know" section of Portal:Hispanic and Latino Americans. I have since fleshed this portal out. if you go there, and click the blue "Show new selections" text below the article on hispanic and latino americans, you get a new selection of an article, a biography, an image (my favorite part to work on, finding good images for a given broad subject, that have some flair to them, in addition to showing an important subject) and a year in the "did you know"s of the front page of WP. you are still there, for the first half of 2014, so readers will get your listing randomly as they go there. This is just a minimally revamped portal, to serve as a, well, portal, for readers curious about the topic. Please give me any feedback you might have about what i did. the articles i selected are all "featured articles", and i may take the time to add what are called "good articles" as well. PS at some point i may try to write an article on the subject of your film. its hard to find info on him though.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:58, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Yarini

Thanks Mercurywoodrose. Found these links on Google -- https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=&oq=la+prostitucion+sus+causas+sus+males+su+higiene&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ADFA_enUS485US485&q=la+prostitucion+sus+causas+sus+males+su+higiene&gs_l=hp....0.0.0.12476...........0.KcFFvjatxZg#q=yarini's+funeral+new+york+times

you can click on the most informative ones -- M -- Mig (talk) 22:44, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236773545_Murder_in_San_Isidro_Crime_and_Culture_during_the_Second_Cuban_Republic Mig (talk) 23:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

I have the book above as a PDF file and can upload it -- but don't know how to do it here. Mig (talk) 23:44, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

We can't host downloads here, especially if the copyright is not clearly licensed under our rather stringent standards. We do NOT require that a publication be available online in order to cite it; we just ask that the citation be clearly enough formatted to enable somebody who has a copy of the publication in their hands to look it up. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:25, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

<redacted what appears to have been a massive copyright violation [see discussion above]>

Ok, thanks -- for the record -- my work is fiction completed in 1997 for a UCLA undergraduate class. Mig (talk) 00:55, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

8.^ Jump up to: a b Kovarik, Casey. "TFT alum tells history seventeen years in the making". Daily Bruin. Retrieved 2014-08-05. This article dates my screenplay/work. So it's important to note it and avoid confusion. http://dailybruin.com/2014/08/04/tft-alum-tells-history-seventeen-years-in-the-making/ Mig (talk) 23:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Latino or Hispanic portal

I thought it was really nice and comprehensive despite its brevity. It's also Important to explain the complexities of Hispanic culture.

Btw. I was wondering how I can provide a DCP format of Old Havana for any Film Fest if needed? Please, let me know. Thanks so Much. Mig.

Mig (talk) 03:07, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The portal is just a summary of the best articles written on the subject to date. none of the content is original to the portal itself. the only way to communicate nuances of the topic is to try to find a good selection of articles and images that convey it. the DYK's really show the importance of the cultural revolution staring in the 70s around chicano literature and activism for example. for instance, i will not be including some of the "B" and "GA" articles that are only tangentially related, such as people of some latin descent who have nothing in their professional lives that reflect that (such as porn stars), or small towns with substantial hispanic minorities or majorities (unless the town had some event there which galvanized people around the topic, such as a riot or a new law). some portals have a quotation section, but thats a LOT of work, which i cannot find time to do. I dont know what a DCP is, and am a complete dunce when it comes to video formats, downloads, etc. I will be happy to see if the film qualifies for an article once it comes out. cant guarantee, but if it gets enough attention, i will start the article (assuming i havent gotten tired of this silly WP before then :)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:56, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Hahaha! It's the sort of format all big festivals will be asking for because digital images fragment on the big screen. I love the coverage on chicanismo because so much of it seems to have gone by the wayside. Check out Harry Gamboa and ASCO Mig (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, i get the impression that so much of the movement is really stagnant as a public process, much like feminism and african american culture, all at a time when its needed the most. most of it has devolved into simple ethnocentrism and isolation. or so it seems.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes. That is true -- the movement was exemplified by journalist Ruben Salazar and avant garde artists like Patssy Valdes, Harry Gamboa, Gronk and others. The isolation is not self-generated, but the result of prejudice and stereotyping in the mediaMig (talk) 07:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi mercurywoodrose-- I was wondering if "anonymous (street meat)" could have its own page so that it can be cross-referenced. It's a really good piece and has been seen just about everywhere. The Latino portal is so good -- I love that dirffrent people are featured at different times -- thanks so much for that. We don't get much attention outside of certain national issues. There's a man out of Orange County who has a blog called "Ask a Mexican." Very funny. Kindest regards -- Mig (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

The column is ¡Ask a Mexican!. i will add his image to the portal. I remember reading in Books In Print how few books there were on Simon Bolivar. totally ridiculous. the latin influence on rock is underplayed (bill graham sought it out though). the list goes on and on. PS my interest comes in part from my wife who is of part mexican descent, but didnt get any mexican culture (youve heard this story before im sure). I have a similar issue with my name and its presumed heritage, and how i didnt get that either growing up.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

A lot of people feel that way and have a similar impediment with culture. Mig (talk) 04:59, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Oh, to address your question about anon street meat, i doubt it can pass notability. I may look at refs, but short films like that often dont get articles. sorry to disappoint you. If you actually own the copyright, you could release more stills, and the Commons can host all the images you want that are not personal, including stills from films and photos taken during production.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:52, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

What would releasing the photos do? I have some. But not many. Lots of photos from Old Havana. Mig (talk) 08:35, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

First, always consider that any photo uploaded to the Commons is essentially copyright free, and may be used for ANY noncommercial or commercial purpose, although the user is required to at least say where they got it and who the author is (ie: "image credit:Migdia Chinea/Wikimedia Commons" added at bottom of image, like "associated press" at bottom of pictures in news stories). the purpose of the upload is to have important images in one location where the license for use is clearly stated. someone may want to write an article about your film, and if they know there is an image here, they dont have to ask permission first to use it. you have a category at the commons, [3], and i will add a link to it from your article. you can also add a link to the category from any articles on your films. If you wanted to upload images from the production of your film, journalists could use those easily in writing an article, or even if they wrote an article on a related subject. you lose some of the commercial potential of the images (you can of course still sell them, and you can upload smaller resolution versions of images you may want to be able to sell at full resolution), but you may gain in easy publicity, and of course the knowledge that others can learn about the filmmaking process, etc. your images could be used in another WP article on, say, filmmaking or women filmmakers. We definitely need good images of Old Havana.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I created this user category for you Files by User:Migdiachinea, so you can track all your uploads in one place, whether related to films or not.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Women filmmakers would be great or Women Filmmakers of Hispanic origin would also work. Yes. It's great that people could find images there. I will upload the ones I've got later -- I've got some issues accessing them on my Mac that I will try to resolve. Thanks so much! Mig

Image upload

Hi Mercurywoodrose -- how do I upload images? Mig (talk) 01:45, 31 August 2014 (UTC) --Mig (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)BTW, how are pictures uploaded to that site?:) -- I cannot upload images to my image upload page. It's way complicated :( Mig (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

If you havent tried this already, go to [4] and try there. its pretty easy to use.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much -- I've got my TM logo Ciboney Productions, which is beautiful, and my other TD.  :) Love Mig (talk) 21:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

In reference to Anonymous (street meat). Can we un delete this WP entry? Also the Ucla film notables contain NO hispanics. For the record Moctesuma Esparza and Migdia Chinea. Please verify. :)

I cannot find enough independent information on Anon, YES, inc, or the short film on yarini to justify articles, sorry. very few short films get articles on WP, though having them in a list of works is quite common. just as few short stories get articles, but some authors short works are included in their bibliographies. its all about relative notability. we need a cut off point for any topic. IMDB can list everything, but that doesnt show how important a work is. we also dont have articles on 99% of schools below high school level. yes, they exist, some for decades, but the schools themselves are usually not particularly notable, even those that celebs attended. high schools do get in the news, and of course some sports careers begin in HS.

I removed the redlinks on the shorts and yes inc, as we dont want redlinks for topics that we know dont have notability yet. anyone can of course research them again, at any time, and if new info is available, create an article. redlinks should be reserved for topics that are clearly worth creating an article on, but for which no one has bothered yet.

I dont know about the UCLA film notables. if someone should be added, give me a name, and ill consider adding it. PS, i do a lot less editing now, after my recent efforts to improve the various portals (including the LA and hispanic am portals), so i cant promise much right now. I do hope to see the film on yarini when it comes out.(mercurywoodrose)76.254.32.49 (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

your ciboney logo was deleted for not having proper permissions. the logo is not only trademarked, but eligible for copyright, due to its complexity. thus, you will need to file an OTRS with the Commons, to keep the logo there. that means, of course, that you would GIVE UP the copyright status for your logo. you would not be giving up your trademark right, which is probably all you need, so that no one can use it to promote their own interests. it just means people could reproduce it on the internet w/o your permission, as long as it wasnt used improperly. i dont know how to submit an OTRS. go here to learn how. I would upload your logo myself, but since its copyrightable, i cannot do so, as i dont own the copyright. only you can do that. I dont know what "TD" stands for, is it another logo?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

I added Moctezuma to a newly created list of ucla film school alumni. there is no official process for finding out who is hispanic and an alumni. give me a name, and if they are, ill add it. the list SHOULD have a ref for each name on it, but many lists like this dont. as long as the main article says they are an alum, thats enough for now.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

New Issue

To https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mercurywoodrose Mercurywood Rose: Can you please remove all birthdate references from the cache? -- Google has ruined my life with useless and damaging information, which they will NOT remove. At least not without upside the head legal threats and even then Mig (talk) 13:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

sorry for the delay. you posted your request in the entirely wrong place. i have sent a request to Wikipedia:Requests for oversight, via email, and found the edits where your dob were added. hope this fixes it. i take seriously any privacy violations on WP, esp for nonpublic dates like birthdays, even for "cranky" editors like yourself (im smiling as i write that, you know you've been a bit of a character here, right?).Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi mercury wood rose.

Got your message. The matter was dealt with. I'm not cranky. I'm a filmmaker in an industry where 94% of the product is controlled by 3-4 agencies. Can you say olygopoly or anti trust?  :) Mig (talk) 04:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

oh, i know how it is down there. I would have an attitude too if i wasnt baptized by michael ovitz or whoever is in charge now. :)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Something like that. Except Michael oOvitz has gone into retirement with his billions. Mig (talk) 04:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)bye. I've made three films since Old Havana. Would it be possible for you to check my IMDb? Thanks so much!!

July 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 20:23, 7 July 2016 (UTC) It's not unsourced it is just an update on My work. You can see it on film festival websites and on IMDb and see the active actualfilms.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Migdiachinea. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Migdiachinea. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Migdiachinea. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your note on my userpage

Hi, I just saw your note on my userpage. I'm happy to help you, but please use my talk page next time. Feel free to tell me what you needed here. Something about programming/wikitext? Sunmist (talk) 09:42, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Slamdance Film Festival. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Deidie (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

I have not heard a response with reinstatement. Please advice. Mig (talk) 00:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

September 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Orange Mike | Talk 16:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

If you have actual published information from reliable sources, then once your block is over you can add it to the article, or offer it in the talk page of the article for others to examine. As it is, you've just been trash-talking the festival for a while now with no hint of any actual, y'know, sources for your accusations. I know nothing about the topic, and don't pretend to; but your edit history on this topic gives any reader a very strong impression of jealousy and sour grapes, even if that is a false impression. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 00:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Blocking

Unfairness and racism.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Migdiachinea (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I write and write and I’m ignored. Please respond on point. You have an advantage as I’m not coding literate and have an issue with my left wrist. Mig (talk) 04:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

• No. You are not "writing and writing", and you are not being ignored. There is no justification for your edits, which constitute an attempt to abuse Wikipedia for activism. Whether your cause is justified or not is beside the point: we are an encyclopedia, not Facebook. You've been doing this on the Slamdance article for about two weeks now, without complaining about your wrist or about "coding", so all this rings very hollow, I'm afraid. Look, I'm very sorry if you were slighted or mistreated by whoever is involved in that organization, but Wikipedia is NOT the place to air that out. Drmies (talk) 16:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Please, unblock me. I’m sorry and suffering from this lockdown. Mig (talk) 05:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Drmies. I request to be unblocked as it is an unfair thing to do. The Slamdance FF Wikipedia page looked more like a publicity ad than the page of a professional film festival. I explained over and over what the issue was. No one has responded. Indeed Wikipedia is an encyclopedic source that I use fir my own research. But it’s wrong to use it to publicize and aggrandize yourself without regard to truth. I am a truth seeker. Also I pointed out that the festival is used by its well-connected founders to promote their own films making it difficult for minority indie filmmakers to gain access. I don’t believe that Slamdance FF has ever had a minority filmmaker selected to it. Much less a minority woman. To be quiet is to be complicit. I still have wrist issues. Thank you. Mig Mig (talk) 20:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

I had responded but I don’t get a response to my response.

Constructive for me means the truth. No embellishment. This is punishment for trying to get someone’s attention to something that I thought was self serving.

I see incorrect or slanted things that I have never corrected. The objective should be information. Not self advertising. Why is everyone sucking to to entertainment. Many People are not nice not practice what they preach. My own page doesn’t contain all my credits. It’s frustrating because I Have worked hard to attain them. I don’t know anyone who can code so they can’t be changed. It seems Capricious you’re punish me for doing once what others are doing regularly. I do apologize but I don’t know what to say. I was trying to get attention to something wrong. I tried several times. That was not the way to do it. I wrote to jimmy twice but got no response. I have responded but for some reason I don’t get your emails.

I wish I could appeal to your sense of humanity. Don’t know. Deep fried okra take me at face value. Super honest and above board.

Mig (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

I apologize for grammatical errors. My phone is old and got a new battery. However, that has not been a solution. I wish I had a magic wand to wave away all the frustrations I feel at numerous things at this time. I See enormous hatred out there. I look forward to normalcy. I do. Mig (talk) 23:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

The rich get richer and the poor get lockdowns. Mig (talk) 15:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters.

Please see UTRS appeal #37515 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 47874

UTRS appeal #47874 has been closed. The ever wise Drmies puts in well in their block summary. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Frankie cropped with Zoe and Cicero.jpg

The file File:Frankie cropped with Zoe and Cicero.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #75597

is closed -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)