User talk:Message From Xenu/Archive 2

User	Talk	Contributions	eMail

Status: ONLINE

^{Click for details} | ^Change

Userboxes (edit) This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify) This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify) DGAFThis user does not give a fuck. This user is part of the adoption program, but is taking a break from adopting any new users. This user is a member of the Welcoming Committee. User:Alexjohnc3/Userboxes/user age js-NThis user is fluent in JavaScript. PHP This user is an expert PHP Coder. py-2This user is an intermediate Python programmer. əThis user is a Grammar Nazi. UKThis user uses British English. cAPSCAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL

Re: Rollback

Hi Xenu.

I would really like to see you gain some more experience fighting vandalism before I give you rollback. You really don't have a lot of reversions; I was able to look at all of them in a very short amount of time. Most of them were good, but here you re-added an uncited negative statement to a biography of a living person. Also, some of the interactions that you had with Thatcher were concerning.

I really hate to deny your request; you haven't really done much wrong with your reversions; I just think you need a little more experience first. Please don't feel too badly about this. What you should do now is fight more vandalism, to gain more expertise, and maybe in a week or two, ask me again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by J.delanoy (talk • contribs) 19:51, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

"vandalism after recent release of block"

The "vandalism after recent release of block" checkbox in Twinkle's ARV tab is meant to be checked for vandals who have come off of a block on the current day and begin vandalizing again. I noticed that the last couple of reports at AIV that you filed had this line in the report, including one IP that had been unblocked for a week and had only vandalized once. Unblocked vandals only qualify for an automatic reblock if the begin vandalizing immediately (1 day) after their block is released, not a few days or a week. Please keep this in mind when submitting future AIV reports, and be sure to keep up the good work! Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:49, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't know that, I thought it was for users/ips that had been blocked. Thanks. Message from XENU^{u, t} 19:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem! Lots of people get that confused. I've been mulling over changing Twinkle's description of the checkbox to make it a bit more accurate, since it is so often misinterpreted. Kudos on the vandalism fighting, you seem to be doing a good job. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Message From Xenu. You have new messages at L'Aquatique's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You're back!

It's nice to see you around again! When your account started vandalizing, I was like "what??!" J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

I'm pleased to say I've now fulfilled your request. Please remember to use it only for obvious vandalism. You can find out more at WP:RBK or ask me! Pedro :  Chat  15:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

I am delighted that your request for Rollbacking rights on Wikipedia was accepted! My congratulations. Best Regards From,
Limideen 15:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Friendly note regarding talk page messages

Hello. As a recent editor to User talk:99.234.64.156, I wanted to leave a friendly reminder that as per WP:USER, editors may remove messages at will from their own talk pages. While we may prefer that comments be archived instead, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous editors like this one- from deleting messages from their own talk pages. The only kinds of talk page messages that cannot be removed (as per WP:BLANKING) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppet notices, or IP header templates (for unregistered editors). These exceptions only exist in order to keep a user from potentially gaming the system. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 04:04, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah thanks for the note. I always thought it was against policy to remove warnings, obviously not. Thanks for the heads-up. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 04:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

No worries! I did not know about it either (and used to revert IPs like crazy when they removed warnings) until someone else told me.  :-) --Kralizec! (talk) 04:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Bradtv has pickup Arrested Development for New Episodes

My Channel "Bradtv" has pickup the rights to air 'Arrested Development' from Season 4 to Season 10.Bradtv and Fox is still thinking about Seasons 11,12,13,14,and 15. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crystal27 (talk • contribs) 04:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Read WP:COI and WP:CITE. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 13:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

hans adolf krebs

i changed the date to 1938 because he couldnt have married in 1838 since he was born in 1900 thank you. so please the correction i made was not an error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.113.176.209 (talk) 16:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Whoops. Sorry for that, I'll be sure to glance at the rest of the article first! Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 13:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

North York Astros

Hi, Could you explain why you keep removing the citations in this article? Thanks WikiGull (talk) 11:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

The user was reported in WP:AIV at the time, therefore I was reverting his actions until an Administrator reviewed them. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 13:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Tibet

On the contrary! people remove my comments on the Tibet talk page all the time. Controversy talk is not welcome there. Check. So I did the same thing, removed a part of our discussion. 83.254.145.87 (talk) 22:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

And I removed the see also on Mumu because the only link there was red, you can not see something which is not there.

Perhaps people were removing your comments as they were vandalism, or not suitable. Regardless, editing of other peoples comments isn't really accepted. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 13:56, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

My comments were definitely not vandalism. Tibet is not a free country. China occupied Tibet and the Dalai Lama tries to work for a free Tibet. It Is a controversial issue, yes, but is not vandalism. Some (chinese?) people overthere are making their best to stop any comment on these issues, consequently, in almost all Tibet related pages. This is not he first time. And often by using the claim that is not an issue for the article, that it is not for the talk page, and talk pages are not a forum. As far as I know controversial issues are suposed to be mentioned, discussed and pointed out, even in the article lead. I can not see this in those articles. Those people are hindering this by hiding behind a neutrality mask. If editing of other peoples comments isn't really accepted, than why are people like user Gimme Danger is doing it so often?

83.254.145.87 (talk) 16:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure, and it's not my place to say. You might want to raise the issue at WP:ANI. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 16:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

This message was much nicer! Cookies and ewerything. I just edited a little, sometimes when I am at my cousins house, taking care of the dog. But we don't have a computer, my mom doesn't want me to have one, but my cousin doesn't care. Sometimes I am using a computer in the school, so I don't have a talk page. Thanks for the nice message!

83.254.145.87 (talk) 22:17, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

COD4

I play it on the Nintendo DS. It's solid but don't really compare to the 360 or PS3. Burner0718 ^Wutsapnin? 00:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Do those handheld versions have multiplayer ability? Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 17:08, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

RollerCoaster Tycoon

What i was trying to do over the weekend was to move RollerCoaster Tycoon to RollerCoaster Tycoon (Series) and RollerCoaster Tycoon (video game) to the original namespace. Sorry for the confusion. StarfoxRoy|guestbook| 17:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Airwolfe

Well, first off he wasn't anonymous, he was a registered account that's pretty clearly a block-evading sockpuppet; second, he was claiming to be a student, a common ploy of professional marketers trying to sneak promo pages on (and if he is a marketing pro, as he seems to inadvertently indicate in his unblock request, then he really needs to write better). But perhaps that was a little gratuitous ... I'll take it out, if only to give him less reason to complain. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Theresa knott was the blocking admin in question. However, this one clearly quacked like a duck ... same article, different title as the one created by blocked User:Web marketing. That wasn't the only one, either. See the SSP report. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Dear Message From Xenu,
I thought you may like to know it was not me that approved your rollback request, but I alerted you. I am a fellow rollbacker but I like congratulating other rollbackers. It has recently caused misunderstanding me alerting whether declined or approved as some editors thought I was the decider. From,
Limideen 22:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Ah no. I noticed it wasn't you (unlike the others I actually checked the request afterward :)), but I just thanked you for taking the time to congratulate me. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 22:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Good Good. Happy Editing!
Limideen 22:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you ...

for reverting the vandalism on my Talk page! --Faradayplank (talk) 03:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

TiddlyWiki

Yes, I am seriously saying it. The article needs work, but if you took ten minutes on Google to do some research, you'd see that it's the oldest and most popular client side wiki software. Steven Walling (talk) 21:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks.

Nice to see your message on my talk page. Yes, admins could have used more good faith. I appreciate you stopping by and leaving a helpful message. --GPPande talk! 10:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Ireland naming dispute compromise proposal

You may be interested in an all-encompassing compromise proposal tabled in respect of the Ireland naming dispute at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(Ireland-related_articles)/Ireland_disambiguation_task_force#Appeal_for_an_all-encompassing_solution Mooretwin (talk) 13:06, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Unnamed

I dissagree with your assesment over my edit to this article, particularly as I am a fan of Stone Brother Racing (Ford) and not a Holden or Rick Kelly supporter. The facts in which I refer to are correct and Lowndes did admit in an interview on Channel 10's RPM that he would have won the championship had he rejoined after the field had passed. Infact, I would argue that not allowing my edit is infact more of a sign of bias then allowing my edit.

But at the end of the day you appear to have more authority on this point so your opinion is obviously the one that counts, but I would ask that you atleast reconsider as my comment is absolutely valid and is indeed a point that is often raised when referring to the incident. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.136.146.190 (talk) 12:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Problems editing while logged out

This Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Major UK ISPs reduced to using 2 IP addresses explains it. DuncanHill (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Retiring

Oh, Christ. :( --Kizor 21:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the sarcasm, highly appreciated. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 21:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Dude, I haven't been sarcastic towards you. I'm about as subtle as a brick to the head, if I was being sarcastic it would be a lot louder.

I do hope that we'll be seeing you again soon. I don't doubt your competence or benefit to the project, I just think that your temper's getting the better of you right now (because hey, retired, QED). It's a problem in online discussion, not a defining feature. I was blocked because of mine, and was granted adminship six months later. --Kizor 21:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

I guess just a large overreaction on my part. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 22:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

It happens to us all here. When I grow up I'll lead an investigation into the ways being online affects our communications, the ways we think it does, and what to do about it. The pre-www Internet at least had some attempts at formalizing netiquette, right now things seem to have regressed.

I can't think of any way to end this message, so here are dancing kittens. G'day, Kizor 01:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

FYI

Don't know if you noticed, but your user page was vandalized last night, don't worry somebody fixed it.208.242.58.125 (talk) 21:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

RfA thankspam

		Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 61/52/7; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral. Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message! Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge TalkContribs, 17:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.187.76 (talk) 21:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Ireland naming question

You are receiving this message because you have previously posted at a Ireland naming related discussion. Per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names#Back-up procedure, a procedure has been developed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration, and the project is now taking statements. Before creating or replying to a statement please consider the statement process, the problems and current statements. GnevinAWB (talk) 18:12, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

No flagged revisions category up for deletion

The category associated with the no flagged revisions userbox you have placed on your user page is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009 April 23#Category:Wikipedia users who oppose Flagged Revisions and you are invited to share your opinions on the issue. Alansohn (talk) 05:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Mistake

I havent altered the TNA page you say i have, you must have sent the complaint to the wrong person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.133.94 (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lucid Desktop

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lucid Desktop. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucid Desktop. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Username policy

As a bureaucrat on the English Wikipedia, I am charged with upholding the username policy. As such, I feel it is necessary for me to inform you that your username is awesome. Tehehehe :-) --Deskana (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

hello and thanks

[[hello, and thank you for your message. As you said before, my last disturbance was a test, as a result of the recent controversy over the validity of this site's information. I can assure you that it will not happen again. Thank you for staying on top of things!

68.55.126.43 (talk) 21:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Potentially anything

I don't understand what meaning should be assigned to the statement "It could potentially be anything". Could a fish "potentially" be a bird? If not, why can't the fish be "potentially anything", while the Pac-Man game at MediaFire could. In any case, it is relevant not because of what it "potentially could (or could not) be", but because of what it actually is: the Google version of Pac-Man.  --Lambiam 19:35, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Yo.

Hey, it's Tanner from Mozilla. Remember me? Haven't talked in a while. Just sayin' hi. Pilif12p 22:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

XENU?!

XENU?! Holy crap! Tom Cruise was right! RUN! - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:15, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, couldn't help. :) That's your laugh for the day. If I can help with your reviewing situation you asked HJ (he is in England and it is 2:15am there), please let me know. Take Care...Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Ha, thanks. :). I'm okay, finding my way around the reviewing stuff :). Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 02:40, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. If you need any help, my talk page is always open. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:46, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks & FYI

Re: "the Queensland Legislative Assembly" → "the Queensland Parliament"

You may already know ... We don't have an Upper House in Queensland. So, the parliament is only the Lower House ... ie the Legislative Assembly.

Regards Cablehorn (talk) 02:44, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 18:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Userfied article

I have put Bitcoin in your userspace at User:Message From Xenu/Bitcoin. Good luck with it. Polargeo (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Same for User:Message From Xenu/Lucid Desktop. :) Enigma^msg 02:25, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Bitcoin deletion review

I also went to the admin in question's talk page in order to create one ... filed here. prat (talk) 14:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Expand

Template:Expand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 22:58, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

RFC on the inclusion of a table comparing SI units and Binary prefixes

Notice: An RFC is being conducted here at Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes. The debate concerns this table which includes columns comparing SI and Binary prefixes to describe storage capacity. We welcome your input

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Computing --RaptorHunter (talk) 18:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:PlayStation Network outage

Hello. I am here to let you know that deriding other users the way you did on that article's talk page is uncalled for. There is no place for bad attitudes or disrespect on Wikipedia, as it creates distractions from actually fixing the problems or disruption from people who may have taken offense to your post. In the future, please compose yourself better and do not resort to personal attacks. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 12:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

There wasn't a personal attack, it was simply a wake-up call to awful editing by 15 year old kids who can't play on PSN and want a medium to complain about it (Wikipedia). Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 12:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

What's with the attitude? The article needs major improvements, but your ranting doesn't achieve anything. Chris TC01 (talk) 15:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Truth hurts. Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 16:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I must again request that you watch your tone. If you do not wish to participate in a civil manner on Wikipedia, I'm sure GameFAQs would welcome you with open arms. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Ha, okay. "I'm sure GameFAQs would welcome you with open arms." - not like that consititutes a personal attack or anything... Message from XENU^{complaints? leave me a message!} 23:04, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm providing a perfectly reasonable response to your attitude. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)