In response to your feedback edit

There is a response to your 4 December request here: Talk:Jesse_James#Edit_request_on_4_December_2011. You need to explain what you want better and give a suggested text.

Ariconte (talk) 07:00, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

In response to your feedback edit

Hi Mensatop2. I'm not sure what project you weren't finished with or what went wrong, but perhaps part of the tutorial might help?

WormTT · (talk) 15:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

In response to your feedback edit

Please, be bold and contribute to Wikipedia!

David1217 22:40, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

In response to your feedback edit

Thanks for visiting! If you have questions, visit Wikipedia:Tutorial or contact me at my talk page.

SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Regarding your article edit

Hello Mensatop2,

I saw that you made some progress on your article. What I noticed is that you said that the Second Civil War is "also known as the Reconstruction Era". If this is true, then I strongly urge you to go through the article Reconstruction Era of the United States and make sure that the information you have is not already included there. If it isn't, you must add it to the existing article, don't create a new article for "Second Civil War". If something has multiple names, we cannot have multiple articles as well, or everything would get confused! Thanks for your understanding, Athleek 01:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

In response to your feedback edit

naa g

Noah Otshudi (talk) 23:32, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Mensatop2. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added Dismas. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I ain't familiar with is and I probably won't I have so much you don't have I would to share but someone would have to help meMensatop2 (talk) 05:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Basilica The cannon that the salesman Urban had built to destroy the walls of the Constantinople, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dismas|(talk) 05:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC) Well Mr. speedy deleter, look at the fall of Constanitople Article and you'll find I am correct!!Mensatop2 (talk) 05:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Basilica The cannon that the salesman Urban had built to destroy the walls of the Constantinople requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dismas|(talk) 05:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Second Civil War concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Second Civil War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (James gang passenger train robberies) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating James gang passenger train robberies, Mensatop2!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your article submission The Second Civil War edit

 

Hello Mensatop2. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Second Civil War.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Second Civil War}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've never been allowed to make contributions except by way of money....... edit

I've tried so hard to make people aware of things not listed here, I know I didn't do too good, but I work slow and when sombody takes off something I'm doing it's very depressing, and now I find that people are getting paid by a manufacture sales etc. this is not to be or else anything can become propaganda and then this becomes something other than what its meant to be I donate money and I feel that there's a lot of greedy people tight but if you can't send $5 you shouldn't be here of of shame. We seek the truth, let's keep seeking the truth.Mensatop2 (talk) 20:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Article on emperor Nerva edit

Good Article, but it references Nerva's sister as marrying Emperor Otho's brother, then stating that Nerva in 69 was the brother in law of the emperor (Otho) which is incorrect. please adjust.