User talk:Meelar/archive 11
MusicalAngel
editHey Meelar, thanks for the welcome message! Will see you guys around!
RfA
editThank you for supporting my RfA. I will do my best to serve the Wikipedia community as an administrator. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 21:00, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- good luck :) --ReDM0oN - (scrivimi) 07:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Steve Espinola here
editI've had trouble with some folks regarding the biff rose page, and especially willmcw, who I think is deludeed, but good editor on the most part, though his tactics leave something to be desired.
Could you show me where the page about me was? ThanskSteve espinola 20:57, 9 August 2005 (UTC) Steve
- There are many reasons to believe that User:Steve espinola is one of many sockpuppets that are attacking the Biff Rose article. For that reason I am inclined to give more credence to the unregistered user than to the so-called User:Steve espinola. If you have any reasons to believe otherwise then I'd be happy to hear them. Thanks, -Willmcw 21:40, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
- PS: The "Steve Espinola" of note has a webpage, SteveEspinola.com. I'm going to ask that the anonymous user send a note from that domain to your email or to mine in order to establish his identity. That's the standard procedure for celebrities. I assume that you are a disinterested admin and are willing to act as an arbiter in this matter. (I'll post the same note on User:Steve espinola's talk page too). Thanks, -Willmcw 21:47, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
This is so weird
editWillmcw has obviously picked me out to be someone other than who I am, in regards to edits I made that expanded on his original plan on the Biff Rose wikipedia entry. I have discovered numerous places where the words of Rose would most certianly be taken as Racist, Anti Semtic and Misogynistic. I've noted that on the entry, and eah time, Willmcw has taken down my entry and stricken the information. I've added quotes taken from ROse's own website, to which he has removed or attempted to hide from view.
I have never once identified myself as anyone other than the name I use to edit under, which is the americanized version of my birth name, which I use in my life. I am am usicina in Los Angeles, I do not have a website, nor do I claim to be from New York. But I work as a studio musician and background vocalist, primarily in mexican styles of music, for the latino communities her in Soutehrn California and back in Mexico.
Willmcw has made my entry into wikipedia difficult, but as you can see by my contributions, I'm trying to clean up old articles and copy edit others. To help with the project.
thanksSteve espinola 22:37, 9 August 2005 (UTC) Steve
I'm the Steve Espinola who is friends with Biff Rose. I'm the one who left the unsigned posting on the page of the fake Steve Espinola. If you go to Steve Espinola.com and email me with a phrase of your choosing, I will echo it back to prove my identity. You're helping a vandal.
thanksSojambi Pinola 9 August 2005
Some time ago, you supported the nomination of American Old West at the COTW. I have now renominated it at the new US Collaboration. If you are still interested, you can support the article with your vote there!--Fenice 08:55, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I appreciate the importance of an administrative function here.
I can forward an external link to a site as well as forward published materials from a bi monthly newsletter that is published where this information appeared.
Barcoding Inc. Vote for deletion
editThank you for moving the page I wrote from speedy deletion to VfD. The voting is 5:1 in favor of keeping the page (after 5 days). Jehochman 23:00, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Func's RfA :)
editMeelar, thank you for your support of my adminship. It was very much appreciated! :)
Please never hesitate to let me know if you have concerns with any administrative action I may make.
Func( t, c, e, ) 03:38, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
I noticed you voted on this VfD. There are 7 others that are basically the same. I'm posting this note to everyone who voted for one and not the others, so we can get at least a consistent result when they are all processed. If you could vote on any of the below that you so far haven't I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks:
- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Peter Fossett
- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Tom Bemmes
- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jeff Morgan (Ohioan)
- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/David R. Smith
- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Douglas E. Mink
- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Arthur Stanley Katz
- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Steve Austin (politician)
At some point someone should hammer out a consistent policy on politicans of this vein, but until then case-by-case voting is king. Getting the same result across the board will be helpful for now. -R. fiend 03:44, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for watching out for me
editHi, Meelar. Looks like I'm on your watchlist. I appreciate the user talk page reversion.
Oh, and if you'd like to double-check my handling of the Rohingya problem and the two sockpuppet bans, I'd appreciate your advice. I am no longer Mr. Unilateral. Uncle Ed 15:33, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks, Meelar, as well. --Nlu 17:22, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for welcome
editHello :)
Meelar - Look's like I am on your watchlist as well. I inputted a post about a plumber Mike Tarinelli who uses heated urine to eliminate odors either in smelly kithen drains or when spread over a location where a dog/cat deficated on a lawn. You had mentioned that the information needs to be include within a written source to be substantiated otherwise it would be eliminated. I am tracking down some printed articles (none of which I can find on google)and will post. I did find one link however:[[2] The concept is similar to perfume which was originally made from whale vomit. It was a strong odor that essentially modified to create perfume. I understand you are trying to do your job, I just want to understand how I can further substantiate my posts so they do not get deleted.Regards and thank you for your support Donkey1
Final decision reached
editThe arbitration committee has reached a final decision in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Mlorrey case. →Raul654 22:36, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
Photos vs. Drawings
editJOOC, why are you of the opinion that a photo is better than a drawing? In the cases of overtly sexual photo, or a photo depicting a sexual act, the photo is a violation of Florida state law as Wikipedia has no adult verification system and thus is providing pornography to minors. I will agree in the case of tasteful nudes which do not exhibit masturbation or sexual acts, a photograph is probably superior, but there is no need for photographs in the cases of masturbation or sexual acts. The photograph adds nothing to the article, except bringing it into violation of Flordia law. Agriculture 16:13, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
Hey Meelar... thanks for answering my query... I did go to the page you directed.. but was unable to find a email/message link. I'm really not all that familiar with Wiki. Could you help me find the email/contact button. thanks.
Schmidt and Hackett
editYou worked on articles on the special election in Ohio on August 2. I have posted my articles on the nominees in that race, Jean Schmidt and Paul Hackett at Wikipedia:Peer review and would appreciate your comments. The individual pages are at Wikipedia:Peer review/Jean Schmidt/archive1 and Wikipedia:Peer review/Paul Hackett/archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 19:26, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
Regarding the Wikipedia Signpost.
editYou left me a notice that you might be interested in writing articles. The best place to do that would be in the newsroom, where there are instructions to do so, as well as sign-ups for regular columns. Leave another note on my talk page if you have any questions about it. Ral315 20:03, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
Rude user
editYou may want to check out curses thrown randomly in your direction on the Masturbation VfD and the subsequent RfC. Marskell 11:28, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
History of Arizona
editThank you for your commentary on the article I listed on FAC. Zscout, a few anons, and I did my best to meet your objections and would like to know if my edits were satisfactory at the FAC. Thank you very much. Toothpaste 22:26, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Help with dispute
editI recently edited the entry on The urge that I felt was poorly done and not extremely factual (although some of what I removed is factual, simply without any references to the origional material posted I had nothing to go by but my own research). The original editor reverted much of my edit and from the looks of their message on the article's talk page it seems unlikely that they will be happy with any future edits (at least by myself). If you would be so kind as to look at the article I think it would help out a great deal. Some of the text they put in is extremely close to a fan site they listed as a reference. I have no desire to get into an editing war with this user but feel that at least some of their reversion is less than advantageous (some of it is usful such as the albums they included and the refrences they put in after my edit). I contact you only because you are the admin who welcomed me to wikipedia so I remembered you. Thanks for your help and time. --Mr. Dude †@£К ║ Çøת†яĭβü†ĬŎИ 00:56, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks and a question
editThank you (belatedly) for your kind welcome message (even if it was just robotically generated?) As a brand new Wikipedian (but experienced user of Wikipedia) I gotta say Wikipedia is GREAT!!!! I am mightily impressed! One quick question I could not find answer to in the Help pages (although I'll bet its in there someplace). If I discover a page whose name does not abide by the conventions, e.g. [[Berlin School]], which should actually be [[Berlin school]], (second word in no-caps) should I bother to rename the page to what it should be? (Would that screw up other links to that same page?) Or should I just link to [[Berlin School]] and leave it at that? Slehar 15:47, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your praise on my peer review. I've submitted the article as a FAC and would appreciate your vote at Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Jean_Schmidt. PedanticallySpeaking 17:05, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Naming conventions
editHi Meelar, Sorry to bother you again (I searched thoroughly in Help first, and I want to make sure I get it right. Tell me if there is someone else I should bother instead of you). About Berlin School again, the Berlin School is a branch of Gestalt psychology. Would it be more appropriate to call the page [[Gestalt theory Berlin school]]? It strikes me that just "Berlin school" might conflict with any schools in Berlin unrelated to Gestalt theory. Slehar 17:34, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
History of South Carolina
editHello. History of South Carolina is on Featured Article Candidates for a third time due to recent controversy. Because you commented on one of its past nominations, you may be interested in commenting this time at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/History of South Carolina. Toothpaste 19:23, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Grr? Grr!
editWasn't grring at YOU! was grring at Willy, whom I blame for everything, and always have, even before I knew of its existance. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:57, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Re: Categorization
editSome of them aren't showing up on the category since the first page of the category only displays the first 200 articles/categories arranged alphabetically. If you check under the "I" section, you'll see that it is there.
Yet another reason why I want to get this done. :) --tomf688<TALK> 21:22, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Phishing corrections
editI worked on improving the Phishing article. I am wounder if the changes I have made are good enough, or do you need it to be elaborated more? --ZeWrestler Talk 17:32, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
1337
editNice to see you using my 1337 babel template. well I didn't make 1337-2 but I did make the first one ({{User:UBX/1337-3}}), making it part of babel. Anyways I also wanna say you are one AMAZING welcomer. Keep up the good work. Esperanza forever! Redwolf24 (talk) 07:43, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
EdouardGlissant vfd
editI thought I'd leave a note on this page because I'm not sure it's appropriate to comment further on the vfd page, but the current EdouardGlissant page isn't actually a mispelling, it that there's a missing space between his first and last name, doesn't seem like a common error, or one that people would easily correct to Edouard Glissant. It seems like a needless redirect. Anyways, now that I've nominated it for vfd, can/should I remove it and redirect to the other page? Thanks and sorry for cluttering your talk page. Kewp 20:37, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Hi there. I've moved the stub back to the end of the main content of the stub. Please leave it there unless you can convince me that it doesn't belong there. Mike Dillon 02:15, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
- The Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting page says "It is common practice to put the tag at the very bottom of the article." That's all well and good, but I do not consider the stub sorting project an authoritative guideline. Please leave the stub as I wrote it unless you are making a substantial contribution. Mike Dillon 02:25, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
- The main reason I want it at the end of the stubbed content is that I think it looks better. I also think that it is more likely to get someone to expand the stub in that position. Moreover, I think that placing the stub marker after list-based sections like Partial bibliography and External links introduces visual clutter. I'm not adamantly opposed about moving it to the bottom, I just resented your moving it without adding something to my talk page within one minute after I created the article and ignoring my "please leave it there unless you can convince me." Mike Dillon 02:37, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
- I think I've decided to leave the stub marker where I originally placed it. Wikipedia:Stub#Categorising stubs says "By convention, these stub templates should be placed near the bottom of the article" (my emphasis). As far as I'm concerned, the current placement is near the bottom of the article, so I don't think it needs to be changed. I could see moving it if I had stuck it at the top of the article, but from my perspective it is currently at the bottom of the content and near the absolute bottom. If the article had non-list sections, I would support moving it to the absolute bottom, but with the current content I think it is best as is. Besides, the main purpose of the stub sorting project is to put articles into the correct stubs, not to move around stub markers. Sorry if I've disappointed you. Mike Dillon 02:52, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
- The main reason I want it at the end of the stubbed content is that I think it looks better. I also think that it is more likely to get someone to expand the stub in that position. Moreover, I think that placing the stub marker after list-based sections like Partial bibliography and External links introduces visual clutter. I'm not adamantly opposed about moving it to the bottom, I just resented your moving it without adding something to my talk page within one minute after I created the article and ignoring my "please leave it there unless you can convince me." Mike Dillon 02:37, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
Fast on the draw!
editI was about to revert Adam Bishops page and you beat me by seconds!. Thats mighty fine shootin' pardner! Less than a minute to restore the page! My hat is off to you! Hamster Sandwich 04:39, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
- Well the same guy hit DJ Clayworth's page so I was able to do some good tonight. I feel a sense of fulfillment now! Hamster Sandwich 04:43, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
You might be interested to have a look. Regards --Pgreenfinch 12:55, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Admirer...?
editShucks, I'm speechless. Thanks for the save and the kind words. There are so many obvious deletions that I don't have to worry about deleting something potentially useful. :) Best, Lucky 6.9 08:08, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your vote
editThanks very much for your vote of support on my Jean Schmidt article. I'm pleased to say it is today's featured article of the day. PedanticallySpeaking 16:52, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
I have progressively expanded this article adding sections on music, art, literature, cinema and theatre. I hope to add more in following days. I may or may not have it completed by the close of the AfD process but wanted to let you know that I am working on improving the article. I would be grateful if you could have a look at it. Capitalistroadster 06:56, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
U.S. Congress Category:
editIn case you didn't notice, there is a discussson and/or vote about category names for U.S. House members. It is at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 September 6, last item. I thought you muight want to contribute your two pfenning worth. Thanks Lou I 20:18, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
Thanks.
editI would like to thank you from taking the abusive messages off my talk page when I didn't know it was there. Duesel 00:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Thanks!
editThanks for the support on my RfA. I was very pleasantly surprised to see so much support throughout the week. Please do keep an eye on me and my logs, especially while I'm learning the ropes with the new buttons. Thanks again! -Splash 23:40, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
priceless etymology my, um, clown.
editHA! Let the world suffer through RfA and earn the PRIVILEGE of viewing the etymology of "ass clown" at Special:Undelete! Such knowledge is not to be thrown before swine! Best wishes to you too, FreplySpang (talk) 03:53, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
My RFA
editThank you very kindly for your support of my nomination. I promise your trust hasn't been misplaced; I will only be slightly buzzed with power, but never drunk. ;) · Katefan0(scribble) 21:31, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
At it again
editI'm back at it again with my Bruce Johnson article, nominated as a FAC. He's Ohio's lieutenant governor and already at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bruce Johnson are votes opposing. I find when I don't go out and ask folks such as yourself for their votes, my FAC's invariably are defeated. So I'd be grateful if you'd put your two cents worth in. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 17:46, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
The charter is here. (Relating to Esperanza)
editHello Meelar, the Charter for Esperanza is up. Take a looksie :) Redwolf24 (talk) 02:43, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- why are you listed under prov gov and gen membership? :o Redwolf24 (talk) 03:04, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- Oi, I think you're confused. You were like... the 13th member. So you were already part of us ;) I guess ya forgot :P so remove yourself from general membership as you're already at provisional government. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:08, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
Esperanza made less bureaucratic
editHello again, I have (unilatterly) taken away the 'assembly' idea, as per my reasons at that edit summary and per Wikipedia talk:Esperanza/Charter. I have left the admin general, as some leadership is good. Now, all you have to do is be a member to establish consensus, the whole assembly idea is gone. Also, I have added an advisory committee, of four members, with limited power besides watching over the admin general and making sure he doesn't do anything stupid. Please look at the ammended charter, and I would love a comment. Redwolf24 (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
The last time I'm spamming you all with Esperanza stuff
editHello Meelar. As you may or may not know, there have been some troubles with Esperanza. So now, as a last ditch to save the community, please vote at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Reform on all neccisary polls. P.S. I'm very sorry for spamming you all with these messages, and this will be the last time. I recommend putting ESP on your watchlist. Cheers and please look at that, let's stop the civil war then. Redwolf24 (talk) 02:48, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the Welcome
editThank you Very much!! I will ask you if something comes up for sure.Shelburne Kismaayo 01:08, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Mlorrey has asked for his block to be lifted. You may wish to share your views at User talk:Mlorrey or Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration, where the matter is being discussed. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 15:52, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks!
editThanks for the welcome and, yes, I took that photo of Ben Gibbard.
++++++
Meelar -You are a very patient and detailed oriented guy. The world needs more of your kind in order for the truth to be told. A while back I posted an article about Mike Tarinelli, the plumber who discovered how to heat urine in order to eliminate odors caused by cat or dog feces. You were nice enough to explain how to properly document and format - thank you. I am happy to report that I have heard of other uses for Mike Tarinelli's urine. It now works on vomit stains from cats and dogs as well
Barnstar
editI, Gaff talk bestow upon you the Random Acts of Kindness
Barnstar for going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked.
Senate pro tem
editYou have so many shiny barnstars, and I have none... :( :D Anyways, I'm looking for any ideas on Constitutional articles to touch-up (I'm currently working through Senate President's pro tem). Any ideas? Staxringold 01:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
editI forgot to say thanks back in August when you left some information on my talk page. So, thanks! -- Chupon 15:19, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
Hey, thanks!
editThanks for the welcome!
I've actually been here a while -- since January. Usually, I edit the List of interesting or unusual place names, or I write road geek articles (as I am a road geek). Generally these are for state highways in Massachusetts, where I live (such as Massachusetts Route 225). I actually just went to the Wiki Symposium at OOPSLA '05 in San Diego.
Life... But How To Live It?
editHi! I've now changed the text for the Life... But How To Live It? so that it is no longer a copy violation, please reconsider your vote for its deletion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Life..._But_How_To_Live_It%3F). Thanks! Oddbjorn82 21:29, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Guess everyone forgets every once in a while. Me more than others though. Thanks! --W.marsh 05:34, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
That barnstar
editWell... thanks! -- Captain Disdain 06:13, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks ...I have a question!
editThanks for the notice ...I've also written a slightly more in-depth (and hilarious) acrticle about my own home town, which has justifiably been deleted. I also know of several other people (who wish to remain anonymous) who are doing similar things ...HOW do we post them in a section of the BJAODN? There's a fairly large collection growing of these spoof articles, and perhaps it'd be easier for everyone if we could just create our own corner of the BJAODN which we moderated ourselves, for everyone else to see?
Hope you can help me out
-Bates
As Yet Untitled
editHi Meelar,
I just got a message from you, and you removed my post. I was busy with putting in the lyric for this song but you seem to think I was vandalising Wikipedia or putting up poetry, I guess that's a mistake ;) I'm not here to mess things up but helping to expand Wikipedia. Check Terence Trent D'Arby, it's there the title of a song from Introducing The Hardline According To Terence Trent D'Arby
Greetz Lily
Thanks
editThanks for your message about notability. The way i see it, a wikipedia article should not be included by notability, but by its reference value. Something shouldn't need to be special or interesting, just likely to be looked up to meet inclusion criteria, imo. this trend oof "notability" seems a little sinister to me =/ TastemyHouse 23:53, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks
editHope the pages are a bit better. Have reformatted so there is the little box, a bit more context, and cut some duplicative content. Let's see also what the consensus is on the LPF History and will rework on that basis. MG4UMG4U 23:57, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks!
editThanks alot! Everyone here is very helpful and I am having a fun time working here! <->Refusetobesilenced 02:36, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Esperanza elections
editVoting begins at 12:00UTC on 16 December and all Esperanza members are encouraged to join in.
This message was delivered to all Esperanza members. If you do not wish to receive further messages, please contact Flcelloguy. Thank you.
News from Esperanza
editHello, fellow Esperanzians! This is just a friendly reminder that elections for Administrator General and two advisory council positions have just begun. Voting will last until Friday, December 30, so make sure you exercise your right to vote! Also, I'm pleased to announce the creation of the Esperanza mailing list. I urge all members to join; see Wikipedia:Esperanza/Contact for more information. All you need to do is email me and I will activate your account. This will be a great way to relax, stay in touch, and hear important announcements. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?)
This message was delivered to all Esperanza members by our acting messenger, Redvers. If you do not wish to receive further messages, please list yourself at WP:ESP/S. Thanks.
Request for relief
editThanks for the greeting on my talk page, Meelar. You might notice my interest here has been singular in focus, attempting to refine and balance a page that was created by members of an on-line forum and which advanced a somewhat promotional view of their site.
I've spent a lot of time watching and improving the article in the past few days. But I fear being drawn into a pattern of non-cooperative edits by members of the site who either created the article or are drawn here by links from that site to the article. The latest group of edits by an apparent fan of the "Psycho-Babble" forums included dead links, removal of meaningful content from the Wikipedia article, and repeated allegations of stalking.
Since I'm not savy in accessing Wikipedia's vast infrastructre for resolving conflict and protecting integrity of content, could you help me find a way to maintain this article with some integrity? Thanks ProveReader 21:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is too complicated
editI quit. I keep getting chewed out for doing something wrong that I don't know I'm doing wrong.
bye bye Ruhe1986 23:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Don't give up. Give it time to develop and things will get better. SR - RE
By the way.
editHow do you quit wikipedia and delete my account?
Mark for Deletion
editI am still trying to work my way through understanding policies and rules, and the hows and whys for Wikipedia. I have discovered a page that I think should probably be deleted: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anime_Unleashed. I have posted my objections to the talk page for this entry. How do I "mark for deletion" or at least start the process of moving it toward either deletion or serious examination of it's value in the encyclopedia? GestaltG 23:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, I seem to have found my way through the maze to the cheeze: For anyone interested, here is the link to the Articles for Deletion instructions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:AfD. I have listed the Anime Unleashed article for deletion. Whether it ultimately is or is not deleted is up to others, whoever wants to weigh in, and whomever makes the final decision. I have made my case for deletion and will monitor. GestaltG 05:17, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
An Esperanzial note
editAs I remember, the last spam that was handed out was on the 20th of December last year, so I think it's time for another update. First and foremost, the new Advisory Council and Administrator General have been elected. They consist of myself as Admin General and FireFox, Titoxd, Flcelloguy and Karmafist as the Advisory Council. We as a group met formally for the first time on the 31st of Decembe. The minutes of this meeting can be found at WP:ESP/ACM. The next one is planned for tonight (Sunday 29 January) at 20:30 UTC and the agenda can be found at WP:ESP/ACM2.
In other news, Karmafist has set up a discussion about a new personal attack policy, which it can be found here. Other new pages include an introductory page on what to do when you sign up, So you've joined Esperanza... and a welcome template: {{EA-welcome}} (courtesy of Bratsche). Some of our old hands may like to make sure they do everything on the list as well ;) Additionally, the userpage award program proposal has become official is operational: see Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award to nominate a userpage or volunteer as a judge. Also see the proposed programs page for many new proposals and old ones that need more discussion ;)
Other than that, I hope you all had a lovely Christmas and wish you an Esperanzially good new WikiYear :D Thank you! --Celestianpower háblame 16:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Message delivered by Rune.welsh using AWB. If you wish to recieve no further messages of this ilk, please sign your name here.
Another Esperanzial note...
editHi again Esperanzians! Well, since our last frolic in the realms of news, the Advisory Council has met twice more (see WP:ESP/ACM2 and WP:ESP/ACM3). As a result, the charter has been ammended twice (see here for details) and all of the shortcuts have been standardised (see the summary for more details). Also of note is the Valentines ball that will take place in the Esperanza IRC channel on the 14th of February (tomorrow). It will start at 6pm UTC and go on until everyone's had enough! I hope to see you all there! Also, the spamlist has been dissolved - all Esperanzians will now recieve this update "newsletter".
The other major notice I need to tell you about is the upcoming Esperanza Advisory Council Elections. These will take place from 12:00 UTC on February 20th to 11:59 UTC on February 27th. The official handing-over will take place the following day. Candidates are able to volunteer any time before the 20th, so long as they are already listed on the members list. Anyone currently listed on the memberlist can vote. In a change since last time, if you have already been a member of the leadership, you may run again. Due to the neutrality precident, I will not vote for anyone.
Yours, as ever, Esperanzially,
--Celestianpower háblame 09:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
(message delivered by FireFox using AWB on Celestianpower's behalf)
LevelCheck
editI know you were very involved in dealing with User:LevelCheck (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/LevelCheck/Evidence). I just wanted to let you know that I believe I've figured out that User:Firebug was behind him. I'm working on putting together the proof. Keep an eye on Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Crotalus horridus. -- Netoholic @ 22:38, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
AU
editHey, you're at AU? Myself also. Small world, that of political science majors is. Wally 03:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Page deletion
editRevolution within the form is up for deletion. I ask for a vote for transwiki. Thanks. WHEELER 00:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Istook.gif
editThanks for uploading Image:Istook.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 06:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Microeconomics rewrite
editHi, User:Radeksz has proposed a rewrite of Microeconomics on that article's talk page, in case you care to have a look. dbtfztalk 09:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Istook2.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:Istook2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 05:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
An AU student who is a fan of Tintin?
editLooking at your edits, you and I have a lot in common, my friend. File:American University Flag.gif--Descendall 12:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Greetings, Meelar!
You voted on the previous FAC nomination of Bruce Johnson. I've resubmitted it and would appreciate your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bruce Johnson. PedanticallySpeaking 21:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
United States Bill of Rights
editHi, I'm soliciting Wikipedia:Peer review#United States Bill of Rights comments from people who contributed to the FA on the 1st Amendment, since there doesn't seem to be any response at PR. Many thanks, Kaisershatner 21:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC) PS, I think you may have welcomed me intially. And look what I've done since! Kaisershatner 21:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
US Senator infobox
editIs this for use on all senators or just the incumbants? American Patriot 1776 01:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
editThank you for the welcome message that you gave me back in Sep. of 2004. As I was not yet clued in to how things work here, I assumed that was an automated message and deleted it eventually. Just wanted to let you know I meant no offense in doing that. Lambertman 21:32, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the Welcome!
editHey, thanks for greeting me. A quick question though. Was that really you saying stuff, or an automated response? Bio rules 06:31 March 25 (UTC)
Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #2
edit
|
|
Please see Me... and do pennanceFrankB 09:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Situation of administrator abuse
editHi, I'm in a potentially awkward position with an Administrator. I have read the Wiki pages on dispute resolution but I'm still not sure how to proceed.
The Admin ContiE has a personal grudge against me for reasons I do not fully understand. He has been this way since I began frequenting wikipedia.
I have done work improving the furvert article. He has basically gone on a crusade against any edit I make. He controls every furry category article and several others ruthlessly. He is an iron fist and bans anyone he edit wars with. I had uploaded pictures and he deleted them with no talking. He seems to believe I am every person he has had an edit war against. He is always using personal attacks, calling me troll without reason. I uploaded them again and he voted them for deleted, but to his surprise the person who runs the images, thank you Nv8200p, found they were acceptable once I tagged them properly. Just recently he removed both the images without himself discussing it in the talk page (unless he was the same person who discussed only one) with the edit here [3] Then ContiE assumed bad faith, added his constant insult of troll in the talk page. It appears on a completed different wiki, a comedy one in all things, somebody else stole my username and I believe this was Conti himself and uploaded them. ContiE showed it as his reason. While vandalism like his, I would revert and mention it, he would ban me permanently if I undid his edit. That is why I am asking admins for help. He holds a couple of accounts on wikipedia and I think they are administrators so I have to be careful who I tell about this. Arights 06:18, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I need some help
editHow do I add myself to a category? The CVU, to be precise. hobbie 11:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Old Skool Esperanzial note
editSince this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #3
edit
|
|
sidiropoulos
editi ve added some more info on sidiropoulos.--Greece666 02:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Archive Deletion
editI accidentally created the wrong page for an archive of a talk page, I have already moved the content to the correct page but the first error still exists. Talk:Oh My Gods/Achive 1 is the page that needs deleting. Thanks--Lzygenius 04:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
New Speech and debate stub catagory
editDear Meelar: I saw your greeting to the user who created the Speech team disambig page. I'm not sure what it's there for, but, anyway, I've been trying to populate a new stub category: Category:Speech and debate stubs. I thought it might interest you. --CTSWyneken 15:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
A short Esperanzial update
editAs you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.
As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Wikipedia:Esperanza/June 2006 elections.
Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, —Celestianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
(Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spiderman)
I have threatened to climb the Reichstag, dressed up as and did so, became bollocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy against climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spiderman, and then had it become an official policy on Wikipedia (and to be an official decree by the Supreme Cabal Regime of the English Wikipedia (SCREW)). Is Absolutley fantasitic!. This is so great!
"In extreme cases editors may be tempted to climb the Reichstag building dressed as Spiderman in order to promote their cause. This is absolutely forbidden and can result in an indefinite block from editing Wikipedia."
This single event is a great example of all the good qualities of our beloved Wikipedia! Horay!
Thats what I love about this Wonderful, wonderful website.
Next stop: The Kremlin!
Thankyou!
Proposed Georgia Move
editAs a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested_Move_-_July_2006. Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus. --Vengeful Cynic 03:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Borgqueen
editUser:Borgqueen has been a big problem to other users. She has constantly deleted articles in perfectly good standing. This has not happened to me yet, but I've saw the frustration in other users. Wikipedian27 18:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
August Esperanza Newsletter
edit
|
|
|
September Esperanza Newsletter
edit
|
|
|
Sid McMath is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found here. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. Sandy 19:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Punk'd
editFound you on cypherpunk. Only you, oddly. If you happen to know what the defaults are on cpunking, could ya post it at the cypherpunk talk or my own talk? --Falos 21:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
November Esperanza Newsletter
edit
|
|
|
Image:Barney frank.jpg listed for deletion
editAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Barney frank.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Nv8200p talk 02:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Barack Obama FAR
editBarack Obama has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome template
editHello. I substituted your welcome template on most of the user talk pages it was transcluded onto. Just wanted to let you know. While I would ask you to substitute it in the future, I see that more recently, you have been subst'ing it. Also, I see that you haven't edited since November. I hope everything is okay, and I hope to have you back on the wiki soon. Sincerely, Wodup 08:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Santo Domingo Metro
editHi Meelar, I went over again your "clean writing" of Santo Domingo Metro and also added a couple more links, you may want to check it out for the last time, Regards, Ciudad jardin - By the way, I'm new in wikipedia and learning Wikipedias Protocol - 5 February 2007
Reism
editIt is a real religion, and has many followers. It is more of a cult than a religion, seeing as its not extremely popular, but the followers of Reism extedn across the entre world. Pyromaggot91 09:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)