Matthewprc

Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 .

Hello and Welcome to my discussion page. Please help maintain a scholarly environment in the discussion of issues relevant to Wikipedia. Thank You.

Image Tagging Image:Phillanguages.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Phillanguages.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 05:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:FilipinoEthnicGroups.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:FilipinoEthnicGroups.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Indonesians in the Philippines

Hello Matthew. This article was listed for deletion. Please provide sources and participate in the voting. Thanks.--Jondel 07:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

It appears that you deleted my comments and vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indonesians in the Philippines. May I ask why? Waitak 16:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Oops. I didn't delete your comments on purpose. It might have been accidentally deleted due to 'edit conflict' :) --User:Matthewprc

No worries, and no offense taken. I restored the comments a bit earlier today. Waitak 13:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Pinoy Big Brother Table

I'm sorry to tell you, but Howard has removed your table. Words are better than tables, he said. Furthermore, you have some missing names in your table before he removed it. Again, sorry. - 上村七美 | talk 03:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

To you, there's nothing wrong in removing the table in the Big Brother article. But to Howard, it is different. You have to understand that Filipinos are not the only users in the English Wikipedia. So don't just stress what is right for you. You should talk to him and have a compromise. For now, your edits will be reverted until that issue is resolved. In fact, you have the wrong info. - 上村七美 | talk 11:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

How about comverting it into an infobox, but not as extensive as thise seen in the season articles. In that way, more people would see it (few would scroll all the way down). For an example, see Big Brother (UK). --Howard the Duck 07:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

merge Pangasinense people/Pangasinan people

Hi,

The two pages Pangasinense people and Pangasinan people both seem to be about precisely the same topic, but have different info & layout. Both articles seem to have tons of useful & interesting info. I'm wondering if Wikipedians who are searching for this topic would find their lives easier if the two articles were merged into one. Perhaps the more commonly used name for this ethnic group would be used as the main page, and the page titled with other name for this group would be a redirect... Many thanks! Ling.Nut 16:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

"Murray's Needs Theory"

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. --Ling.Nut 21:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi! The text is not from the website you specified. -- User:Matthewprc

Filipinos as Formosan vs Malay

Hi, your recent edit on the Austronesian people page grouped the Filipinos with the Austronesian Taiwanese. Can you elaborate why, and if you have sources and/or references, please do let me know. I always had the impression that most contemporary anthropologists had the Austronesian Aboriginal Taiwanese as distinct from the Austronesian Filipinos.--Chicbicyclist 09:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi! The Capelli, et.al. journal (link) specifically answers your question. The haplotypes for Filipino and Taiwanese aboriginal participants were analyzed, and have been found to be similar. In fact, the haplotype of the Filipinos are even closer to that of the Taiwanese aborigines than to that of other Austronesians (such as those in Borneo and in Indonesia). And to further it, Filipinos actually have facial features closer to the Taiwanese aborigines than to the Malays of Malaysia and Indonesia. -- User:Matthewprc 05:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC+8)

Image tagging for Image:Euromalays.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Euromalays.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Ami

Hi,

I noticed your edit to Ami: "Their closest genetic relative appears to be the Filipinos" Can you bring a verifiable source to bear on that assertion? If not, I'll have to delete it. It is kinda questionable, and assertions about the issue of race are often controversial.

Thanks --Ling.Nut 17:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Capelli et al, A Predominantly Indigenous Paternal Heritage for the Austronesian-Speaking Peoples of Insular Southeast Asia and Oceania - The link is located in the Demographics of the Philippines article.

Hey, the Filipino people is quite diverse so could you specify which Filipino ethnic group they are related to. 23prootie 01:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, the study doesn't say about it - but more or less, the study was conducted in Manila, since it is the capital and main entry port of the country - which makes the study more presentative of the Philippines as a whole, Manila being a melting pot of Filipino ethnicities.

Austronesian people

Hi. Please don't clump the the Filipino people section into the the Taiwanese aborigines for two reasons. First, that section is a cultural definition not a genetic one and culturally speaking Filipinos are more akin to Malays than to the Taiwanese aborigines (as proven by Baybayin and the Laguna Copperplate Inscription] as well as Islam in the Philippines). Second, the Formosan languages includes all the branches of the Austronesian language family excluding Malayo-Polynesian languages. Adding the speakers of the Philippine languages, which are Malayo-Polynesian, may disrut that definition.23prootie 00:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

BTW, Please use a source other than Stanford University.23prootie 01:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Or rather, let the 'Filipino people' stand alone for two reasons: 1) The Filipino people have been made into an independent entity from Malay, in both genetic and cultural contexts - through successive Western colonization; 2) The classification of the Philippines as 'Outer Hesperonesian Language' from the 'Nuclear Malayo-Polynesian languages' suggests that Filipinos indeed have become much differentiated from Malays. In fact, if you follow the Malayo-Polynesian article's grouping, then you might as well add 'Pacific Islander' under Malay, since they are both under 'Nuclear MP'. Even the subcategories Melanesian, Micronesian, and Polynesian needs to be placed equal to 'Malay', just as Filipino should be. Even Filipino academics and scholars have been starting to define Filipino identity as different from Malay. :)

If I allow 'Filipino people' to stand alone then I must also allow 'Malagasy' and 'East Timorese' to stand alone also due to African and Portuguese influences respectively, and maybe even 'Indonesian'.23prootie 11:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The reason I suggested that "Filipino people" should stand alone is because the Filipino people have long diverged from mainstream Malay genetic and cultural influences. While Malagasy can actually stand alone (due to the people being genetically and culturally divergent from the standard Malay), East Timorese are actually classified as Malay, and have many cultural afifnities with Malay (thgouh they are somewhat Europeanized to some degree by the Portuguese).

After reading this page, I'm actually starting to doubt this so I changed the groupings.23prootie 23:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

And in the case of theEast Timorese, if Filipinos are recategorized then they must also be recategorized since both are considered Malay, both have cultural affinities with the Malays and both are Europeanized by either Spain and Portugal.23prootie 00:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

THe reclassification under Malayo-Polynesian is better - at least it recognizes the 'bumiputra' Malay and the Filipinos (and other groups) as co-equals and not insist that Filipinos are Malays. :)

Image:Euromalays.jpg

Hello. Do you have any plans to use this orphan image? Image:Euromalays.jpg Thanks. --Strangerer (Talk) 02:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Original research

I put an original research tag on Hispano Austronesian as well as removed references from Tagalog. I have not encountered such a term in academic journals and there are less than 5 hits on Google. This is an AfD-worthy article. --Chris S. 02:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Austronesian.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Austronesian.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Euromalays.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Euromalays.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Kulam

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kulam, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kulam. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits to the Ethnic groups in the Philippines article

I haven't reverted these edits, but they do look questionable. Please see the diffs here.

At one point, you inserted ", but a small-n study concludes that about 3.6% of the Philippine population has varied admixtures of European ancestry." immediately prior to a pre-existing cite of a supporting source. One wonders whether the cited source supports that insertion. If not, the info should be inserted after the cite, and should cite a source which supports the inserted info.

At another point you insert the word "partly" into a statement supported by another cited supporting source. one wonders whether the cited source supports the assertion as you have modified it.

At another point you insert information and cite the Joshua project as a source. I used to cite them myself from time to time, but I grew tired of repeatedly being taken to task for that by editors who argued that this is not a reliable source. I no longer cite them.

Thanks for trying to improve tha article. Could you please review your edits with the concerns I've mentioned above in mind and make any needed adjustments? Cheers. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 07:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:MetroManilaComplete.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:MetroManilaComplete.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151 11:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I have three questions

I made an edit today--one edit--to the article Carrie Prejean and have not made an edit to the article in days, but yet another editor reversed my ONE edit and then reported me on the 3RR notice board. I find this to be a clear use of Wikipedia to win a debate about article content and direction. Prejean was called a series of negative things by Perez Hilton, most of the words are contemptuous and vile, such as the b-word and c-word. There are editors that believe that each and every one of Hilton's use of those words MUST be included in the article about Prejean. Now, I don't see the need to have an article about Prejean dominated by the words and comments of ONE individual (highly negative words at that) dominate the life story of Prejean. It is tantamount to having the words of Saddam Hussein concerning George W Bush dominate the Wikipedia article about Bush. It violates Wikipedia avowed goal of NPOV and it violates BLP. Now, I know that consensus in Wikipedia editing is one of the goals, but consensus does NOT override other valid Wikipedia ideals such as BLP. There can be a compromise made where the gist of Hilton's highly negative opinion is included in the article, but at the same time it does NOT dominate the life story of Prejean. Prejean is notable for many, many reasons, not just her public fight with Hilton. She is notable for being a successful model; she is notable for participating in Deal or No Deal; she is notable for being the current Miss California USA; and she is now notable for being a TV personality. My first question is: Can you at least review the article and see if the second, third, fourth, and fifth repetitions of the b-word and c-word violates BLP? I believe that it does. And my second question is: Is it appropriate to make a report on an editor for violating 3RR even though that editor has only made one edit? And my third question is: Is misusing 3RR to win a debate on the proper interpretation of BLP appropriate? I don't think so.--InaMaka (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Who is a Filipino? listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Who is a Filipino?. Since you had some involvement with the Who is a Filipino? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). –BLACK FALCON ^(TALK) 21:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

AIESEC

Hello, I noticed by your userbox that you are an AIESECer. As a wikipedian I would like to encourage you to edit AIESEC as this page needs much improvement. Thanks for the help. --vierstein^talk|Contrib 01:17, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of ZIP codes in the Philippines

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of ZIP codes in the Philippines. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ZIP codes in the Philippines. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:LIGHT Logo.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:LIGHT Logo.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 11:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 11:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Philippine Chapter in Philippine Youth Congress

I am glad to announce to you that we will be debuting as an organization at the Philippine Youth Congress in Information Technology on September 14 to 17, 2010 at the University of the Philippines, Diliman. Jojit will be Wikimedia Philippines resource speaker at the second day of the conference at the UP Film Center. He will be speaking about Wikipedia and how it revolutionizes the World Wide Web. That will be at 9:00 to 10:00 am. We will also set up a booth at the UP Bahay ng Alumni and we will showcase our existing and future projects. We encourage you to participate in our first major project. We have prepared food and refreshments for you. Please let us know so that we can enlist you to our delegation.--Exec8 (talk) 18:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hokkien, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Philippine WikiCon

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Philippine WikiCon

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed blackout in protest of RA 10175

Dear Matthewprc,

Greetings!

As a Filipino Wikipedian, I hope you are aware of the passage of Republic Act No. 10175, also known as the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, which was signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III on September 12, 2012. Currently, there is a discussion on the Tambayan, the noticeboard for Philippines-related topics, about a proposed blackout of the English Wikipedia in the Philippines in order to protest the passage of RA 10175, similar to the blackout against SOPA and PIPA held earlier this year. I feel that your input on the subject will definitely help in the discussion.

Please feel free to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines#The Cybercrime Prevention Act, and I hope your input will help the Filipino Wikipedia community determine which is the best course of action against this law. Similarly, we hope to get as much input from as many Wikipedians as possible.

Thank you and maraming salamat po!

Kind regards,

Sky Harbor ^(talk) 12:44, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinese Filipino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinese Filipino, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ministry of Education and Teochew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Philippine Hokkien

Thank you! —Wiki Wikardo 00:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Goddamn… You did more than just move it to the correct name, you really got your hands dirty; I’d forgotten was a complete mess that thing was!

Thanks again so much for your hard work on the article. —Wiki Wikardo 02:32, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinese Filipino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chinese Filipino may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Tagalog help needed

Hello Matthew, I'm contacting you because we need some Tagalog translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on tl.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Tagalog Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 17:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philippines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indian, Korean and Anglo-American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

• Publish an article to the journal.
• Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
• Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
• Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
• Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
• Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
• Join the editorial board.
• Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
• Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
• Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
  • Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
• Technical work like template designing for the journal.
• Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
• Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 14:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

Orphaned non-free image File:LIGHT Logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LIGHT Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Proposed deletion of File:Euromalays.JPG

The file File:Euromalays.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of MGC-New Life Christian Academy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MGC-New Life Christian Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MGC-New Life Christian Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:49, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Philippine Physician Licensure Examination

The article Philippine Physician Licensure Examination has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I've remove the unsoruced info, including BLP violations. Fails GNG. Sources are primary. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  // Timothy :: talk  13:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)