Manzilnfl
Welcome! edit
|
January 2014 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Madhesi people has been reverted.
Your edit here to Madhesi people was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://madhesi.wordpress.com%7C) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Multiple accounts edit
Hello. I left a message at User talk:Naver.np, but since no one responded I'm not sure whether the message was received.
It appears that you have used four different accounts, User:Signedbo, User:Naver.np, User:ManzilNfl, and this account. Wikipedia policy on multiple accounts says that a user should have only one account. It is allowable in some circumstances to have more than one account, but that should be disclosed, for example using the {{User alternate acct}} template. If you wish to change your user name or to start over with a new name, there are procedures for that, too.
If you already know all this and I am just bothering you, then I apologize. If I am mistaken and those user accounts are not used by the same person, again I apologize. In any case, could you please let me know that you have seen this message by responding here. Then I will stop trying to send you messages. Thanks, and happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 08:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to LinkedIn has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: LinkedIn was changed by Manzilnfl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866107 on 2014-01-25T03:45:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:45, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Poudar has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Poudar was changed by Manzilnfl (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858491 on 2014-01-30T03:40:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Josh3580. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Poudar because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. —Josh3580talk/hist 04:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poudar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poudar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cnilep (talk) 06:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Removing AfD template edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Poudar. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 12:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts edit
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Admirenepal, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Cnilep (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
April 2014 edit
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Crown (headgear) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 04:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kanchi, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. KJ click here 13:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Madhesi people with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 02:29, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pouder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pouder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cnilep (talk) 05:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Ann Pouder while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 06:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Blocked edit
Hello Manzilnfl. You appear to be a reincarnation of User:Blackhu20 who is indefinitely blocked. Blackhu20 was known for erasing articles. You've erased most of the content of Crown (headgear) in this edit on April 2. You made another large deletion here on April 4. I've indefinitely blocked your account for vandalism. If you wish to appeal your block, see WP:GAB. EdJohnston (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Removing AfD template edit
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Pouder. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 14:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Poudar edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Poudar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sitush (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Worldstallestzipline.jpeg edit
Thank you for uploading File:Worldstallestzipline.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)