Malkawi99
Welcome! edit
|
Hello, Malkawi99. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--مصعب (talk) 12:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (List of people from Irbid) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating List of people from Irbid, Malkawi99!
Wikipedia editor Icewhiz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Needs sources. Red-links (not existing articles) in list should be considered.
To reply, leave a comment on Icewhiz's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Icewhiz (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for this information Malkawi99 (talk) 20:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Malka, Jordan) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating Malka, Jordan, Malkawi99!
Wikipedia editor Icewhiz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Notable figures here possibly questionable, sources required for rest of the article (you are sourcing the people, not the actual content on the town).
To reply, leave a comment on Icewhiz's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Icewhiz (talk) 19:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for this information Malkawi99 (talk) 20:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry edit
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Malkawi99. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 21:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC) |
- If you wish to request an unblock, do so here per the above notice.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:52, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Malkawi99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi @Bbb23:. First, thank you for your responsding to my request. Second, I want to tell you that the ban that you prevented to me from using the English Wikipedia on 27 December 2017 was the first prevent to me. I think that your sentence was harsh for me because you prevented me from English Wikipedia permanent prevention without receiving any warnings from anyone before the ban. I think it was cruel and unworthy punishment for me. And the issue of multiple accounts I did not know that it is prohibited, and I did not create it to avoid any prevention because I originally did not prevent before, and I made it in the name of الملكاوي, even if I want to hide and be careful and undercover I would choose the name of non-Malkawi but I was frank. So I hope to remove the ban because I was unaware of the policies.-- Malkawi99 (talk) 22:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
January 2021 edit
Malkawi99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, for anyone who reads what I write, I hope this text finds you well. I ask for forgiveness for my mistake, and would like to have my ban removed for several reasons. First of all, I am aware that what I did four years ago about the issue of creating the two accounts is wrong, and I apologize for any mistake I made. I swear I was not aware of the policies and instructions. At that time, I was a school student, and I was ignorant of everything about Wikipedia. Currently, I became aware of the policies, and has a good behavior in Arabic Wikipedia. I am an editor (محرر) in the Arabic Wikipedia. Also, I am in my final year at university and I am studying English literature, so I am interested in English. I think the ban is harsh, and it is no longer necessary because I understand what is forbidden to me, and I will not do it again, and instead I will make productive contributions, from which Wikipedia will develop and my English will improve. The ban that permanently prevented me from editing on the English Wikipedia on December 27, 2017 was my first ban. However, I was banned without receiving any warnings from anyone before the ban. Therfore, I think that the ban is unfair and has been around for a long time. In the end, I'd like to say that I do not like anyone to get a bad impression of me, so I would like to change my behavior here in particular.
Anyone here can ask about my behavior in the Arabic Wikipedia, because I've had a good behavior in the past three years.
Accept reason:
It's been several years, and you've apparently become a constructive editor on other projects. I'm unblocking you so that you can have a second chance on English Wikipedia. Please be aware that rules can differ between projects, so you should take a look at our local policies and guidelines. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- @علاء: I'm sorry to bother you with our wiki-drama, but do you have any input on this editor's behavior on Arabic Wikipedia? Our unblocking process encourages blocked editors to contribute to sister projects, which counts in their favor. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello NinjaRobotPirate, hope you are doing well, and I am happy to help We faced the same issue with Malkawi99 at Arabic Wikipedia before 3 years, and blocked him three times on arwiki. After talking with him, we found that all of his "wrong/bad" edits were caused by his lack of knowledge of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, so some arwiki users helped him to understand these policies, and actually his contributions have improved greatly since the beginning of 2019 and he is now an active contributor on Arabic Wikipedia. Best --Alaa :)..! 11:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malkawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malkawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 16:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Al-Wad Sayed Al-Shaghal moved to draftspace edit
An article you recently created, Al-Wad Sayed Al-Shaghal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Wad Sayed Al-Shaghal has been accepted edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cerebellum (talk) 09:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for April 16 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ramez Movie Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presenter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Reminder to mark as completed edit
Hey there, I just wanted to post this to let you know that you seem to have implemented a semi-protected edit request at 7 April 2022 over at Talk:Jean-Claude Van Damme but you didn't mark the request as answered. You can do so by changing the |answered parameter on the edit request from 'no' to 'yes'. Doing so will make sure other editors aren't stumbling across the edit request looking to implement it only to find it's already been implemented. It's also courteous to leave a message on the edit request that it's been implemented by you and I believe it's mandatory to include attribution in the edit summary such as "Implementing edit request by <x> - <reason>" because of copyright reasons.
Of course it's also totally possible that you didn't see the edit request and just implemented the change on your own accord, in which case you can ignore this message.
Thanks anyway for the contribution(s) and all the best. ★Ama TALK CONTRIBS 13:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
My IP address edit
Malkawi99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 213.139.52.204. Today, I opened Wikipedia to start editing but was shocked that my IP address has been globally blocked by @ST47: ProxyBot. It is shown that the IP address or range 213.139.52.204 has been globally blocked (disabled) by him. I think I did nothing wrong. However, my block will expire in 5 days but I want to know further information to avoid any issues. It is shown that I was blocked since I change my IP address by proxying my browsing traffic through another user's computer. I don't use VPN or something like that, but nowadays, I am working from home as a data associate at Amazon. Our working depends on using VPN, so I connect VPN on other cities to work on data. And I connect my computer to my home wifi which I use it in editing on Wikipedia. Is this related to the issue? Malkawi99 (talk) 22:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I can't speak on many of the technical aspects you are referring to, but it appears you are able to edit from this account again. If this is a reoccurring issue, you may want to request an IP block exemption on your account through the UTRS. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:59, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Proposing deletion edit
The article Ameer Al-Thalaam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I see that you are senior editor than me. But, the page you created today seem not to fullfill Wikipedias notablity criteria that it is much of Origional research, no adequate indepth reference presented to show the nitability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instant History (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)