User talk:MSincccc/Archive 2

Latest comment: 2 months ago by MSincccc in topic Reverting edit.
Archive 1 Archive 2

y

Awards for Prince George of Wales

  The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Prince George of Wales (estimated annual readership: 1,300,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)


  The Deletion to Quality Award
For your contributions to bring Prince George of Wales (prior candidate for deletion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child of Prince William, Duke of Cambridge) to Good Article status, I hereby present you The Deletion to Quality Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reversion

Hi dearest editor,
While reviewing the pending changes backlog, I saw you reverted edits here that were done in good faith. Reviewing pending changes didn't mean all edits may not be correct and so, critical attention are done before accepting or the other way round. I believe this was a mistake and be careful to avoid edit questioning. Regards! — Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

@SafariScribe Well I agree it was a mistake on my part. Thanks for your advice. I will keep that in mind while making future revisions. Regards MSincccc (talk) 18:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on David Cameron

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page David Cameron, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Ivanka Trump

On 17 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ivanka Trump, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2017 Ivanka Trump (pictured) became the first Jewish member of a U.S. first family? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ivanka Trump. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ivanka Trump), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

  Hook update
Your hook reached 36,206 views (1,508.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Awards for Princess Charlotte of Wales

  The Three-Quarter Million Award
For your contributions to bring Princess Charlotte of Wales (born 2015) (estimated annual readership: 850,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Three-Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 17:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


  The Deletion to Quality Award
For your contributions to bring Princess Charlotte of Wales (born 2015) (prior candidate for deletion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Charlotte of Cambridge) to Good Article status, I hereby present you The Deletion to Quality Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 17:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh

  Hello! Your submission of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 17:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

@Generalissima I have made the required changes. Thanks for reviewing it. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Million Award

  The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (estimated annual readership: 4,060,832) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers!  750h+ | Talk  14:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC) 18:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Apologies; I saw the View history tab and you were right.  750h+ | Talk  14:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Age and Wikipedia

Hi MSincccc, I would strongly advise you to not refer to your age or any similar information in Wikipedia discussions. On the precautionary side it is personal information not worth spreading, on the practical side I don't think it will help your case in discussions. Feel free to WP:REVDEL this message if you want. Best, CMD (talk) 11:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

@Chipmunkdavis I didn't disclose my exact age. I simply wanted others to understand that I'm a young user still in school, not in college or a working professional. Thanks for your advice. I'll keep it in mind for the future. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 15:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mark Zuckerberg

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mark Zuckerberg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of King kobra2 -- King kobra2 (talk) 12:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh

On 9 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Prince Philip (pictured) was the first member of the British royal family to fly in a helicopter? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

About your message to Sohom Datta

Hey MSincccc, please be careful with the way you reach out to other editors for reviews like you did here. Your repeated calls for the nomination to be supported could be interpreted as canvassing, which can undermine the integrity of consensus-forming discussions like FAC. Please make sure you phrase your invitations neutrally and without influencing editors to leave any particular !vote, should you even choose to solicit participation at all. Let me know if you have any questions. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

@TechnoSquirrel69 This is my first time at FAC. Thank you for reaching out. I will act in a neutral manner when making similar requests to editors in the future. By the way, any comments you could leave at the FAC discussion to help improve the quality of the article would be greatly appreciated, as that is my ultimate aim. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Earthshot Prize

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Earthshot Prize you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim O'Doherty -- Tim O'Doherty (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

New message from Serial Number 54129

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. Notification of noticeboard discussion. ——Serial Number 54129 14:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC) ——Serial Number 54129 14:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Catherine

Hi. You wrote at the FAC that you look forward to my further response. I don't think you want my response there, as I continue to have concerns about the article's prose, the vagueness in the Lead (have none of her public appearances been important enough to mention there?) and agree also have concerns about the sources (while The Telegraph and some of the other newspapers are generally considered reliable sources, not so much with respect to controversial aspects of the Royal Family). IMO, also, unless at least one or two very good book sources exists about a topic, it probably should wait to go to FA). Also, as you did not accept or respond to the substance of either of my examples of the prose issues (which I feel is, throughout the article, not appropriate for an FA article -- passive voice, vagueness, overly idiomatic British phrasing, etc.), I cannot devote the time to do a full review of the prose. I have no desire to stand in your way, and I hope my comments have been helpful. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

FAC

 
story · music · places

Thank you for bringing Catherine, Princess of Wales, to GA and now moving towards higher quality. Thank you also for inviting me! Your last question there: I have a section quality on my user page, and my noms are - with those of other project members - also on WT:QAI. You'll find right now an opera singer and a Bach cantata. Please don't feel obliged to review in return, only if you are interested ;) - The singer is a very peculiar case: a DYK reviewer didn't like the sources, so added plenty of others. I asked him first to nominate, but when nothing happened felt free to go ahead. GA quality is rather independent of who nominates, right? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Today is "the day" for James Joyce, also for Bach's fourth chorale cantata (and why does it come before the third?) - the new pics have a mammal I had to look up --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

New pics of food and flowers come with the story of Noye's Fludde (premiered on 18 June), written by Brian Boulton. I nominated Éric Tappy because he died, and it needs support today! I nominated another women for GA in the Women in Green June run, - review welcome, and more noms planned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mark Zuckerberg

The article Mark Zuckerberg you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Mark Zuckerberg for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 01:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

FYI, this review has been removed as having been an incorrect quickfail. The article is back in the GAN queue. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Catherine, Princess of Wales reversions

Any reason for your reversions? Clarityfiend (talk) 09:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

@Clarityfiend The Telegraph sources are paywalled. You fail to realise that a registered account allows access to only a limited number of articles. As for the other changes that might have been reverted in the process, I will make it a point to reinstate them later before the article is sent for PR. I hope there are no bad feelings. Have a great day ahead. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 10:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Are you sure? I was blocked from two Telegraph articles, but not the rest. Plus I checked every Telegraph reference; that seems like more than a limited number. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Yes. At times, it's at fault and allows you to access it for free. But most articles can be accessed by only subscribed users. User @Keivan.f: and @Tim O'Doherty: can confirm the same. The former is current collaborating with me for the article's FAC; the latter reviewed it successfully for GA. The rest of your edits have been restored. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Okey dokey. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Catherine and William pages

If there needs to be a discussion, it has to include the articles of the whole British royal family. For now, these two articles are the only different ones so until a consensus is reached, they should be the same as the rest. Maria0215 (talk) 14:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

@Maria0215 Not to be so. You can refer to the FAC page and make similar changes to the articles of other royals. Pinging co-nominator and reviewer @Keivan.f and @Gerda Arendt. Regards MSincccc (talk) 14:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Reverting edit.

Why'd you revert my edit on Catherine, Princess of Wales? Most BLPs use a vectorized version of their signature. — 48JCL 17:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

@48JCL Not my fault. It all occurred due to technical glitches on my device. Sorry for the inconvenience. Your edit has been restored. I hope you understand. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 17:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)