LiteratureCompanion

LiteratureCompanion, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi LiteratureCompanion! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Sadleir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Sime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hendrik Adamson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Multiple accounts

What is the purpose of your creating this account?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tarzan Triumphant, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Secondhand Work 01:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mabel Clint

Hello! Your submission of Mabel Clint at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Mabel Clint

On 17 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mabel Clint, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after having to leave her World War I posting in Greece upon contracting dysentery, Canadian nurse Mabel Clint later re-enlisted to serve out the war in England and France? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mabel Clint. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mabel Clint), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francis Hackett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, LiteratureCompanion

Thank you for creating Frank Kane (author).

User:Gazal world, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article. However the article needs more references. You can search for the references on Google books and cite them into article. Perhaps this reference would be helpful. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Gazal world}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Gazal world (talk) 19:15, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

@Gazal world: Thank you for your information and the reference but as you will note I have already used that reference for the article. I made some minor changes based on that reference. If you know of any other reference I would be happy to use it. As you are probably aware, library access due to the pandemic has been very restricted so my research opportunities are limited to online sources. Once these restrictions have been lifted I hope to search for new sources and then update these articles forthwith. Thanks. LiteratureCompanion (talk) 22:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Ernest Headly Sprague moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ernest Headly Sprague, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 16:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ernest Headly Sprague

Hello, LiteratureCompanion. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ernest Headly Sprague, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Cortland Fitzsimmons

Hello, LiteratureCompanion,

Thank you for creating Cortland Fitzsimmons.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hello, thank you for contributing to the encyclopedia. I think this person's biography needs more in depth secondary sources. The format of a several references need work. See MOS:CITE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 01:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

@Bruxton: Hello, I am puzzled by your tagging of this article. I googled this author and found an article on the French wikipedia site. I basically translated the article contents from there and ported it to the the english side. I found a few comparable english references. If the article is good enough for the French wiki, what's the issue for the english wiki? LiteratureCompanion (talk) 21:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I did not find much on the person. Bruxton (talk) 21:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

That is not what I asked. To reiterate, why is the article good enough for French wiki but not for English wiki? LiteratureCompanion (talk) 22:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Each Wikipedia has their own standards. Also maybe the page has not been reviewed there. If the subject is notable you should be able to easily find references to add to the article. Bruxton (talk) 01:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ernest Headly Sprague

Hello, LiteratureCompanion. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ernest Headly Sprague".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Scarborough, Ontario

Scarborough, Ontario has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)