Your submission at Articles for creation: Kent Ryan McLellan (May 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 00:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Lexytonb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:16, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The rejection, edit

This is my first time writing a article, I've noticed the lad has a bit of a social media following. I've been investigating American convicts who managed to flee to Ukraine.

What exactly was I missing in the article? Alot of stock photos wouldn't upload, and he's played important significance In the siege of Mariupol. I was hoping others would be able to fill the article when it started. 2600:8807:8895:C100:7971:B6D8:BFE7:32AA (talk) 01:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Adakiko. An edit you recently made to Arsen Pavlov seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 02:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Lexytonb! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Writing a Military biography on a member of the Azov Regiment., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Lexytonb! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Adakiko (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Adakiko (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kent Ryan McLellan (May 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 23:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kent Ryan McLellan edit

 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Kent Ryan McLellan, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)Reply