User talk:Le Deluge/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films produced by JetaAmata
A tag has been placed on Category:Films produced by JetaAmata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stanleytux (talk) 18:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Category:Roman taxes
If it's very obvious it should be renamed (my bad btw) and i'm the author of it, can I just move it or is that considered bad conduct? Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- Once it's in the official rename process then it only confuses things if you try and do things manually. The other advantage is that its saves you work, as the edits to the articles will be done automatically. Just as general advice - you should always add categories to anything you create, not only because it helps people find things (and a lot of automatic maintenance relies on things being in the category hierarchy), but also it gives you an idea what current naming conventions are. Cheers. Le Deluge (talk) 00:18, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks
For all the category additions to IrlProj! Sarah777 (talk) 18:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello.
You can add the userbox list to your userpage? GXXF T • C 19:02,9/26/2016
Category:Swedish expatriates in Colombia
Hello Le Deluge, you created the above category a week ago, but I think it might be redundant. The two individuals contained within the category are not Swedes who moved to live in Colombia, but Swedes who happened to be born in Colombia and now reside in their native Sweden... so in fact entirely the other way around (and actually, looking at their articles, I am very doubtful whether either of them pass notability for a Wikipedia article anyway). The only other sub-group contained within the category are Swedish ambassadors to Colombia, who aren't really expats. So I think this could go to CfD – what do you think? Richard3120 (talk) 23:22, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Richard3120:I must admit I was looking at it in relation to the ambassadors category, I didn't really look closely at the articles. But it is convention to treat ambassadors as within the expat hierarchy (after all, it's a job abroad regardless of who employs you), so I'm OK with that one. And it's a "proper" category that fits in a well-established hierarchy, so for me that's another reason not to CfD it - personally I think people are a bit too keen to nuke such categories even if they're a bit thin, what happens is that the red-link category patrollers like me end up creating them again in a few months time. So personally I'd leave it. Le Deluge (talk) 11:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- OK, no problem – if ambassadors are considered "expats" I'm happy to leave the category... I just thought I'd bring it to your attention. I do think the other two individuals can be removed from this category though, for the reasons I have stated. Richard3120 (talk) 22:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Hyderabad
Not at all...mergers of existing categories can still be speedied if they fit one of the speedy criteria. Think of it this way: if you had noticed the old category before creating the new one, then it would have been a straight C2C for concordance with the other city-specific subcategories of Category:Culture by city — so even if you create the new category because you didn't notice the old one, when the reason you didn't notice the old one is mostly because it's not in conformity with its siblings, then it can still be speedied because it still fits the speedy criterion. Hope that helps a bit... Bearcat (talk) 14:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Warning
You must not empty categories before nominating them for speedy deletion as being empty! DuncanHill (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- @DuncanHill: There's been such a strong consensus at CfD of late against single-year WP:SMALLCATs that I'd suggest single-article categories of that nature come under WP:SNOWBALL. But just for you, there's a CfD here. Le Deluge (talk) 11:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Duly gone : Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_October_4#Years_in_Cornwall Le Deluge (talk) 05:35, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: September 2016
| ||||||
Category:Belgian industrial relations has been nominated for discussion
Category:Belgian industrial relations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Categorising categories
Hi, short question, is it really necessary to categorize categories? Nothing bad intended here, just want to know exactly the goal of doing it. Thanks. MbahGondrong (talk) 22:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- @MbahGondrong: Yes, it's important to how Wikipedia works. That's why there's only 100 without categories out of 10,000's of categories. They're not simple tags like you might use on a blog, as I said in my previous message humans use the category hierarchy to find things, and also the hierarchy is used for a lot of automatic maintenance. this has some more on the advantages of categories. And as I say, the sport season ones are easy to do as you can just clone them from a previous season.Le Deluge (talk) 00:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, I will surely not make any categories again. Have a nice day. MbahGondrong (talk) 07:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films produced by Jeta Amata
A tag has been placed on Category:Films produced by Jeta Amata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Don't move pages by copy-pasting their material!
The proper way to move a page is via the "move" button. Copy and page moves don't preserve edit histories, and violate licensing terms, and require a WP:HISTMERGE to fix. Please don't do that in the future. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 06:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: October 2016
| ||||||
Notice
Please note that your newly created Category:1860s in Syria was redirected to Category:1860s in Ottoman Syria per outcome of discussions on September 2013. Please refrain from creating/re-creating anachronistic categories.GreyShark (dibra) 11:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Le Deluge. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:Al Naser Sporting Club has been nominated for discussion
Category:Al Naser Sporting Club, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:Helmville, Montana has been nominated for discussion
Category:Helmville, Montana, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:59, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:TempCatForname_trans
Hi. Could you take a look at my question at Template talk:Infobox eSports player? Thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 01:17, 27 November 2016 (UTC) Paul_012 (talk) 01:17, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2016
| ||||||
date format yyyy-mm-dd
In regard to your edit at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DeepPeep&type=revision&diff=754388385&oldid=753965739 ... ymd dates are not deprecated. The template you removed is deprecated. See MOS:DATEVAR, which indicates that yyyy-mm-dd format is still acceptable, though I despise it myself; I much prefer dd-month-yyyy format. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Category:Parishes (Catholic Church) has been nominated for discussion
Category:Parishes (Catholic Church), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2016
| ||||||
Category:Wikipedians who have worked in Antarctica has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wikipedians who have worked in Antarctica, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 05:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Category:Kangta has been nominated for discussion
Category:Kangta, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Jamaica years in sport
Have created some more Jamaican sport by year categories, starting with Category:2016 in Jamaican sport Hugo999 (talk) 03:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2017 Mediterranean Games
A tag has been placed on Category:2017 Mediterranean Games requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2019 in Caribbean sport
A tag has been placed on Category:2019 in Caribbean sport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 15:53, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Event venues established in 2018
A tag has been placed on Category:Event venues established in 2018 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 16:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Cultural infrastructure completed in 2018 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 16:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Category:American Authors has been nominated for discussion
Category:American Authors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2017
| ||||||
Hi Le Deluge
I see you did great work creating Template:Navseasoncats. However, it requires the years to be at the start, so doesn't work for the football club seasons, which all use the format "Fooian football clubs YYYY-YY season", rather than having YYYY at the start as Navseasoncats requires.
Would you be able to use your coding talents to create a variant of this template which would work for the football seasons? There are thousands of sub-categories of Category:Seasons in association football which would benefit from such a template. See for example Category:English football club seasons by year. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: I'll take a look, it should be possible. Can't promise when though, unfortunately I'm superbusy IRL at the moment. Another one I've got half an eye on is improving the navigation for century cats, and also doing a "super-navseasoncats" that does categories as well for the more common category name formats. I see that whilst I've been away you've been doing some good work on Ccirlc for which many thanks, it's come a long way since the 7000-odd it was when I started nibbling away at it! Shame there's some database glitches in there so we can't truly empty it.... Le Deluge (talk) 02:25, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1900s establishments in Saudi Arabia
A tag has been placed on Category:1900s establishments in Saudi Arabia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 23:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Weightlifting in Tahiti
A tag has been placed on Category:Weightlifting in Tahiti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 23:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Centuries in French Togoland
A tag has been placed on Category:Centuries in French Togoland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 23:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French Polynesian weightlifters
A tag has been placed on Category:French Polynesian weightlifters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 07:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Category:History of Belarus by region has been nominated for discussion
Category:History of Belarus by region, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Texcoco
Hi, this municipality is named only Texcoco, the town site or municipality capital is Texcoco de Mora, the old city is Texcoco or Tetzcuco, is correct the redirection in this category. Other correct name may be is Texcoco (municipality). Regards.--Marrovi (talk) 13:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Ok, Texcoco is bigger municipality in Mexico State, Texcoco Municipality there are many towns inside, Texcoco de Mora is a city or Town site for Texcoco Municipality. Grettings!!--Marrovi (talk) 14:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want, you can change the name in this category, the best is Texcoco (municipality), because Texcoco, Mexico State is confuse with Texcoco de Mora city.--Marrovi (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- This is a municipality Texcoco municipality, is big, no only Texcoco de Mora, there are more populated sites or other towns. I would like to make other article for Texcoco municipality, because it's a big municipality with many topics; as archeological sites, towns, geography an others, We can propose a new article, see you. --Marrovi (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- es:San Miguel Tocuila is important town from Texcoco municipality, other villages are an indigenous places when speak Nahuatl languages [1]. In this moment no are edited, may be net time in other languages as English. Thank you very much by the notes.--Marrovi (talk) 17:24, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Le Deluge! I had accidentally mistyped the Ctrl-V command correctly, so I replaced "Category:International sports competitions hosted by Belgium" with "Category:V", instead of "Category:International cycle races hosted by Belgium". I'm sorry for the mistake. Bye! --NaBUru38 (talk) 21:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
lgbt categories duplication
_by_Ron.jpg)
Hi! Thanks for the tip. I take your point about reading how to do things before i do them. Mostly, thank you for not being nasty, i heard this place can be a box of chocolates sometimes. Thanks again.
Vicky Sutherland (talk) 18:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2010s establishments in Brunei
A tag has been placed on Category:2010s establishments in Brunei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 14:33, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Cats
I have fixed the categories on Shimizu Corporation. When I did it originally, I accidentally capitalized the "B". Please be more careful when "fixing" things in the future. I know very well how categories work, but everyone makes a typo every now and then. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: February 2017
| ||||||
Category:Ultra Naté has been nominated for discussion
Category:Ultra Naté, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
New Category: Statistics in regulatory affairs (Guidances)
Hi Le Deluge,
The creation of "Statistics in regulatory affairs (Guidances)" category was envisaged, because I/we would like to have it associated with the related article "Guidances for statistics in regulatory affairs" for which we have also created a "List" in Wikipedia. The category "Social statistics" is not really appropriate for the article, because the article falls in other domains, such as Medical statistics, Biostatistics and Epidemiology. Therefore, I request to remove the category "Social statistics" and replace it with "Statistics in regulatory affairs (Guidances)". Then both the Article and List can be associated with it. Thank you! Harbajan Chadha-Boreham (talk) 16:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Harbajan Chadha-Boreham: I don't mind you deleting Category:Social statistics, that's OK, I was just trying to push it closer whilst removing a red-link category per WP:REDNOT. The categories look fine on that article as they are. I'd advise against a Category:Statistics in regulatory affairs (Guidances) as you're trying to match one article too closely, when a good category is rather more general than that, it might have 30-50 articles. I can see a possibility for a Category:Statistics in regulatory affairs kind of category in due course, but there aren't really enough articles to justify it at the moment. Have a read of WP:Categorization and WP:Overcategorization for more detail. Incidentally, the convention here is to post to the bottom of talk pages rather than the top, and you can sign your posts with 4 tildes, ~~~~. Le Deluge (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Le Deluge, Thank you for your valuable suggestions. The creation of Category:Statistics in regulatory affairs in due course is a good idea. On the article "Guidances for Statistics in Regulatory Affairs", it has a message on the top "This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (March 2017". Actually, the page already has several Wikipedia in-links. I am not sure what else I can do to make the article "not an orphan". Please suggest what to do and how? Also, please could you kindly help me with making an upfront association between the Wikipedia article "Guidances for Statistics in Regulatory Affairs" and the Wikipedia "List of Guidances for Statistics in Regulatory Affairs". I am involved in both of them in an international collaborative effort. The List is under threat of being deleted! I created an in-link to the article within the List today but I am not sure if this will be sufficient to stop it from being deleted. What else can I do, as merger does not seem appropriate to me?
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:LGBT rights in the Soviet Union
A tag has been placed on Category:LGBT rights in the Soviet Union requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
This follows the purging of content that was not about the Soviet period, see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_February_4. – Fayenatic London 00:44, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2022 in Wisconsin
A tag has been placed on Category:2022 in Wisconsin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 04:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)