Kudos152

This is Kudos152's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Jacob Norris has a new comment

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jacob Norris. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Norris (3D Artist) (November 2)

Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TechnoSquirrel69 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for your submission! I'm going to have to decline this for now as there's no indication that any of the sources are reliable; they're either not independent, are self-published, or appear to be unreliable for other reasons (80 Level in particular seems to offer coverage for payment). Let me know if you have any questions!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob Norris (3D Artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi TechnoSquirel!

Thank you for the information and resources, I do however have some questions regarding your exact reasoning for denying the submission. It appears that 80.lv is the main area of critique, but it is currently an established and accepted source across what looks to be about 20+ currently published Wikipedia articles, here's some examples & links for you:

This would be a close example in terms of the creator having an article from 80lv:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godot_(game_engine)

https://80.lv/articles/godot2-interview/

Additional 80.lv references in published Wikipedia articles:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetEase

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noita_(video_game)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hell_Let_Loose

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_Corona

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wild_(video_game)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instinction_(video_game)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling-sand_game

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_simulation_game

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MakeHuman

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_development

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Praey_for_the_Gods

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_PC_games

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_Infinity_(video_game)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unigine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Demons

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_scanning

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stride_(game_engine)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_games_in_the_Czech_Republic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Broadcast

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lonely_Mountains:_Downhill

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahyar_and_the_Legend_of_Markhor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikenfell

I believe this would be setting a new precedent and would require the removal (based on your evaluation of 80.lv) for many already published articles. I am also struggling regarding the NVIDIA articles being dismissed as an unreliable source. Could you elaborate on why that would be refused so that I could better understand the specific reasoning?

Thanks so much! Kudos152 (talk) 21:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Kudos152! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Norris (3D Artist) (November 27)

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob Norris (3D Artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Norris (3D Artist) (December 30)

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lizthegrey were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still insufficient independent, reliable, secondary sourcing with regard to this artist's legacy/importance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob Norris (3D Artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

lizthegrey (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Jacob Norris (3D Artist)

Latest comment: 23 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Kudos152. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacob Norris (3D Artist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic