Klee Bakudan

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Centuries Apart (book) (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bennv123 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Centuries Apart (book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bennv123 (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Klee Bakudan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bennv123 (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alternatives to 'Karen' (November 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cult of Reggie (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cult of Reggie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cult of Reggie (November 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Cult of Reggie

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Cult of Reggie, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:43, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Hi Klee Bakudan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Question: What minor edit? I'm not remembering... Klee Bakudan (talk) 18:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Klee_Bakudan - you're marking most of your edits as minor, perhaps accidentally. --Belbury (talk) 18:39, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Most of the edits I'm making are minor, in my opinion. I'm mostly adding small details to movies and video games. They are minor, but maybe they aren't. I don't know, but I'll defer to your judgement here. Klee Bakudan (talk) 20:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Whoops, I meant to say I'll accept your advice.

(I said "defer to your judgement") Klee Bakudan (talk) 20:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smile.jpg (Smile Dog) (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gobonobo were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Smile.jpg (Smile Dog) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

gobonobo ^{+ c} 20:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Alright, I would like to delete this submission. Klee Bakudan (talk) 23:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Smile.jpg (Smile Dog). You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 21:22, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Question: What do I do if I'd like to upload a picture to Wikimedia commons, but it isn't mine--like a common picture of a demonic dog? Klee Bakudan (talk) 23:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Alright. I have been doing some research into this, and I have successfully (and appropriately) uploaded the photo of the Smile Dog under the release terms of the public domain. I have credited the creator (I think) and noted that I found it off the internet and wish to use it in articles. Thank you, very much. Klee Bakudan (talk) 19:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

@Klee Bakudan: The images you uploaded have been deleted as copyright violations. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 17:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Reversion of your addition of Smile Dog

I have again reverted your addition of Smile Dog to List of creepypastas. Villians Wiki (https://villians.fandom.com) is an open wiki and thus not a reliable source. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 18:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello, I'm Throast. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Halloween Ends, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 22:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Alright, thank you for telling me. Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

I've readded it and cited my sources

<3 Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

The new citation you added does not support Green intending to center the first film around PTSD. Even if it did, it would not fit into that sentence because it describes the different genres of the films (i.e. action and romance). PTSD is not a film genre. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 22:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

PTSD is the main undertheme of Halloween (2018)--David Gordon Green stated in the article somewhere that the first film revolved around Laurie's PTSD. I'll check for it; if I can find it I'll add it. Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

As I said, it may be true that he chose it as a central theme, but it is still not a genre. Putting it next to two genres would be false equivalence. Per WP:ONUS, discuss at talk before restoring. Throast ^{{{ping}} me!} (talk | contribs) 22:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Scream (1996 film), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

I only did one link, and it was one that I think should be in there. There also isn't a lot of links in the plot. Klee Bakudan (talk) 23:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

You did two links. You're welcome to raise the matter at the article's Talk page if you wish, but there's nothing wrong with a plot summary with no or minimal links, and no benefit that I can see to linking phrases such as "cadaver" and "having sex" that a reader will generlaly understand without needing an expository link. DonIago (talk) 04:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

hi~

NahidasWorld (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Klee Bakudan (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to M3GAN, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Umbrella man (JFK assassination), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Minor edits - SECOND NOTICE

Hi Klee Bakudan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Umbrella man (JFK assassination) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Either you didn't read WP:MINOR, or you intentionally ignored it, or you didn't understand it. I strongly suggest that you do not mark any edits as minor. You'll never go wrong doing that, and it will avoid creating problem edits. Sundayclose (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Alright, thank you. I've read WP:MINOR and it's been helpful, and I'm understanding it. I understand what I need to do--thanks for the advice with not marking any edits as minor. Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:05, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Centuries Apart (book)

Hello, Klee Bakudan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Centuries Apart (book), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Centuries Apart (book)

Hello, Klee Bakudan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Centuries Apart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! It had already been deleted I assumed; thanks for the reminder. Klee Bakudan (talk) 19:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alternatives to 'Karen'

Hello, Klee Bakudan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alternatives to 'Karen', a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Go ahead, you may delete it. Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alternatives to 'Karen'

Hello, Klee Bakudan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alternatives to 'Karen'".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

M3GAN

It's entirely inappropriate to change something in an article to your preference at the same time that you start a discussion about the change on the article's talk page. Wait until the issue is resolved before making any changes in the article. Sundayclose (talk) 22:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pet Sematary (1989 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Hey, I've basically reverted this edit as the citation makes no sense and The Worst Movie Ever! only bested the worst premiere record. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

No, you made this edit, and it requires a reliable source. You've done that several times. Consider this a level three warning. Sundayclose (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

@Sundayclose um, I'm a different user giving a different warning. Consider this a level 2000 trout. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Ah, I misread. But the level three warning for Klee Bakudan stands. Sundayclose (talk) 22:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Why though? they haven't made any more offending edits since you warned. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Because there is a previous level two warning for unsourced edits, as well as several other warnings. Sundayclose (talk) 22:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Smile.jpg (Smile Dog)

Hello, Klee Bakudan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Smile.jpg (Smile Dog), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Smile.jpg (Smile Dog)

Hello, Klee Bakudan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Smile.jpg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)