October 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm BrendonTheWizard. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognition have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ 05:52, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognition. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This is the third time you've boldly added these edits, and it appears that you added them without knowing how to (as evidenced by how they broke several vital parts of the page in the process). Please do not continue to reinstate these edits. Thank you. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ 15:03, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

 
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Kawhilaugh42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 05:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Apology! edit

My apology, that warning was in error. I should have left an "error" message rather than a "stop it" message. Wikipedia does have a policy of wp:assume good faith, which I obviously did not. We all make mistakes and are allowed to make mistakes here. I probably have made more edit mistakes on Wikipedia than you will ever make total edits! Thanks for your note, it allowed me to correct my mistake. Cheers, Jim1138 (talk) 05:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

  Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:BrendonTheWizard. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. It appears that you've misused {{An3-notice}} in a way that violates WP:SANCTIONGAMING. Disputes are solved through discussions and consensuses, not through threatening rhetoric and misuse of the dispute resolution process. {{An3-notice}} is to notify users that they are the subject of a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, but you invoked this template without creating a report. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ 02:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Icewhiz (talk) 03:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ARBPIA 500/30 rule edit

Please note that edits such as this one to Assassination of Mahmoud Al-Mabhouh are clearly in contravention to WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 as you are not extended confirmed. Please cease editing Arab-Israeli conflict related pages until you are extended confirmed. Icewhiz (talk) 03:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

response edit

Im well aware of the rules, so i need not to be lectured by you thank you. If you and others want to keep denying Palestine's status as a recognised country, thats at your prerogative, but its also at my prerogative by doing this site a favour by telling people the truth as opposed to taking sides, case and point. Anyways, I have no feelings towards palestine or Israel but I am simply telling the objective truths

Kawhilaugh42 (talk) 03:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

You might want to read WP:TRUTH. But, jeez, do I ever wish I had cronies - at least a couple... One to wash the dishes, and the other to do my laundry would be a fine start, but it seems I am lacking in the crony department at present. Regardless, as you say you are well aware, please be aware that the 500/30 rule is enforceable at WP:AE. Icewhiz (talk) 04:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Seraphim System. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Kafala system, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review Wikipedia's WP:V policy and do not continue to add unsourced content to articles. Seraphim System (talk) 03:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Portal:Limited recognition, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphim System (talk) 04:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Editing in the conflict area edit

You've already received a 30/500 warning. These types of edits would most likely be considered within the conflict area [1]. I have reverted the edits. Please stop editing in the conflict area until you meet the 30/500 requirement or you risk being sanctioned. Seraphim System (talk) 05:17, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 6 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Limonana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm JarrahTree. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JarrahTree 03:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I explained my reasons very clearly.   Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. NEDOCHAN (talk) 00:03, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Palestine–United Kingdom relations. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. No matter how heated an edit war may get, using the edit summary to tell editors to fuck off is unacceptable behaviour. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ 05:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Revival of the Hebrew language. Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 01:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

List of military occupations edit

List of military occupations, where it relates to the Israel/Palestine conflict, is under WP:A/I/PIA. Alot of times this is missed and it's very easy to miss. I just wanted to offer you a friendly reminder that editors under 500 edits or that haven't been here 30 days are prohibited from editing these articles.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 05:15, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Swarm  {talk}  06:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit