User talk:Jonathunder/archive23

Scottish National Antarctic Expedition

Has any consensus been achieved with regard to the phrasing of the description in the penguin image? The discussion on the talk page seems to indicate that the humourous version is acceptable, and even welcome. Thanks! Shobhit102 | talk  16:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

There's no consensus for that. Quite the opposite. Jonathunder (talk) 16:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JohnAllin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JohnAllin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for your hard work and patience. Much appreciated! Hello-Mary-H (talk) 23:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Hormel Austin Daily Herald sourcing

Hello,

Wanted to kindly point you to my August 3 requests made using the Austin Daily Herald, which we have discussed. I am still learning the ropes, so hope it's ok to bring these edit requests to your attention here. Please advise if there is a better way for me to help and / or proceed. Thank you. Hello-Mary-H (talk) 14:22, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jonathunder. You have new messages at Talk:Killing of Jamal Khashoggi.
Message added 17:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXrayᗙ 17:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Fort Jefferson cross photo

You really think that is a better photo? BrineStans (talk) 00:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

For the geography section, one would expect it to show at least some of the landscape The one I added shows the rolling hills, the type of trees, the river proximate to the county seat, so it has more educational value for that particular article and in that sense is better. Yours does show the cross and the sky and might be better in an article on that monument. Jonathunder (talk) 00:58, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jonathunder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Albert Lea Art Center listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Albert Lea Art Center. Since you had some involvement with the Albert Lea Art Center redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Praxidicae (talk) 21:30, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Special Barnstar
		For all your help on getting WP:NRHP 75% Illustrated Smallbones(smalltalk) 02:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Jonathunder a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 17:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

How to delete my current page

Hello, I would like to delete my Wikipedia page Thomas Dellert Dellacroix. The information provided is incorrect. I tried editing my page but the changes were reverted. The person who created my page, my ex assistant was fired, and we are not on talking terms... How do you advise me to accomplished deletion and create a new page ....? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TommyD2019 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

I don't know why you've asked me, as it doesn't look like I've ever edited that page or interacted with you before. However, that means I'm a neutral administrator and I'm willing to help. First, please don't edit the article yourself as you claim to be the subject. (See Wikipedia:Autobiography.) I'd encourage you to start a new section on the talk page stating what is inaccurate and pointing editors to third-party sources for the changes you would like to see. If you don't think you are a notable person and Wikipedia should not have any article about you, I could help you nominate it for deletion, but there is no guarantee it will be. Jonathunder (talk) 00:44, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

TommyD2019 - Your question has already been answered by other editors here. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --AndInFirstPlace (talk) 02:09, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Davidcpearce

This user is now edit warring [1] with me at Jeanne Calment, I had asked them to take it to the talk-page. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Edit wars are never one-sided. You're doing it too. Jonathunder (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

What needs to change?

In the ANI you said you’re not hopeful anything will change. Have you not recognized change in my behavior? What in my recent behavior do you believe still needs to change? Thank you. —В²C ☎ 06:13, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Republic of Macedonia#Requested move 8 February 2019

Will you be so kind to close the topic. It's an obvious and official fact already - Macedonia has been renamed. 2601:647:4200:D900:9CA4:1:B20C:8B4F (talk) 07:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

I just made the page for G Fuel, is it good enough?

Hey again. I rarely (actually never) make articles outside my knowledge accept today. G Fuel is giant energy drink company that millions of people have seen. I desided to make the page for it as it was not there and I don't really know if I am doing this right. I have linked wherever it was black text and hopefully someone else will pick off where I left off. I am really proud of what I have got going on so take look around. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 23:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Mia Art+Feminism edit-a-thon

Mia Art+Feminism Edit-a-Thon

Hello Jonathunder. You are invited to attend an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon at the Minneapolis Institute of Art (Mia) on Saturday, March 9, 2019 from noon to 4pm. Art+Feminism is an international campaign where people come together to improve coverage of women and the arts on Wikipedia. During the edit-a-thon we will be updating and creating Wikipedia articles on subjects related to gender, art, and feminism, with a focus on artists represented in Mia's collection Date: Saturday, March 9, 2019 Location: Minneapolis Institute of Art, 2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis Please sign up here

I don't think I'll be able to make this one, but thank you very much for sending invites. I hope it goes well. Jonathunder (talk) 01:54, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Recent Images

Hi, you may have notice that I've added some banners to your recent images. This is to stop the being copied to commons. Since moving to commons is only a single mouse click (once the new gadget is enabled), then the chances of free image being moved to commons is now much higher than it used to be. The issue is that commons will no longer accept your images with the current license, there must be a creative commons license as well as a GFDL. Thus there is a real risk of your images being moved by someone who does not know that issue, then the image on en-wiki then deleted under F8, and then the commons image goes because of an invalid license. You might want to consider adding the same banner when you upload any more images - I cannot guarantee catching them all. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 17:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for that. I'll copy that to new uploads, which there will probably be many of, since a few people on Commons made an unfortunate decision without broad consultation. Jonathunder (talk) 17:57, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

FYI. Well, commons has been moaning about GFDL since at least 2009, and finally agreed on stopping it at c:Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2018/08#No_longer_allow_GFDL_for_some_new_uploads Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Kim Norton has been nominated for discussion

Category:Kim Norton, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 02:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

File:ElmerLeeAndersonBW.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Shelly Miscavage

Hi Jon, I was looking through my contribution log and saw that I reverted one of your edits w/r/t Shelly Miscavage and the term "disappeared." I didn't realize it was you who made that change, and because you've been active on the talk page, I wouldn't have done that had I noticed who made the edit. Basically my concern with the use of terms like "disappeared" or "missing" is that it seems to imply (or even outright state) that she's being held against her will and/or her husband is keeping her locked up, which appears to be the viewpoint of the many IP editors who periodically insert this into the article. Since the LAPD has closed these missing persons reports as unfounded, I think there are real BLP concerns about perpetuating the "disappeared/missing" language. It implies kidnapping or some other nefarious scheme when that does not appear to be the case. Cosmic Sans (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

User:Thefreeencyclopediamember

Hi Jonathunder. Since you responded to this editors unblock request (they weren't blocked so not sure why a request was made to begin with), I'm wondering if you might take a look at some of their contributions. They seem to be primarily active at Talk:2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, but their apparent desire to post everything in bold, etc. might indicate a bit of a WP:BATTLEGROUND approach to things. Would it be inappropriate per WP:SHOUT to ask them to tone it down a bit? -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for posting on their user talk. I left a similar message on the article's talk page, but yours was better. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Changes to Biography

Hello, You reversed my changes to David Perdue page. I did a lot of research on this topic and cited my references properly, the first time. I did not call that a minor edit, but two days later, somebody undid them. The references are the local newspaper, Houston Home Journal and the links are working to the archived articles. I called it minor the second time, because I was just redoing what was undone. What step am I missing? Dale Hoefer 00:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Missed email correspondence

Hi there Jonathunder, I just logged back in to Wikipedia after... hm... a while ;) I see a notification that you emailed me about the Heather Dale wiki page, but Gmail has conveniently eaten the email, and I am not sufficiently experienced with the wiki system to know if there's a way to retrieve a local copy. Would you mind emailing me again? Cheers, --Oh And Ben (talk) 23:59, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

NRHP contributions, tool available

Hi Jonathunder, thank you for your many contributions on NRHP topics, including new article Swede Prairie Progressive Farmers' Club just now, which showed up on my watchlist because it happened to link to some article i created. But hey, it looks to me like you must be painfully constructing NRHP infoboxes, when there is a much easier way available. Also you hand-created an NRHP document reference, when there is a fuller pre-prepared reference available to copy-paste, which also includes link to the available accompanying photos.

In the current article, the refnum showing in the infobox is incorrect, I guess probably a not-yet-fixed copy from a different infobox. If you do click on it, it brings you to NRHP doc and photos for a different site. When creating new articles (at least for NRHP listings before some date in 2014), try using the "NRHP infobox generator" created/supported by editor Elkman, starting at http://elkman.net/nrhp/. E.g. what you see for this NRHP is yield for the Swede Prairie topic. Note that includes mostly filled-out infobox which you can/should further customize a bit. It has the refnum already and some more stuff. It would be easier to start an article by copy-pasting that in, rather than customizing from a completely different NRHP site.

Also it includes a good draft NRHP document reference:

<ref name="nrhpdoc">{{cite web|url={{NRHP url|id=86001331}}|title=National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination: Swede Prairie Progressive Farmers' Club |publisher=[[National Park Service]]|author= |date= |accessdate=April 22, 2019}} With {{NRHP url|id=86001331|photos=y|title=accompanying pictures}}</ref>

Which includes link to the accompanying photos. What I do is further customize that reference, to add the author and date of prep (like you did already in your reference), and further to add a count of the number of photos and to mention the photos' year(s):

<ref name="nrhpdoc">{{cite web|url={{NRHP url|id=86001331}}|title=National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination: Swede Prairie Progressive Farmers' Club |publisher=[[National Park Service]]|author=Susan Granger |date=May 1985 |accessdate=April 22, 2019}} With {{NRHP url|id=86001331|photos=y|title=accompanying two photos from 1984-85}}</ref>

That reference displays as:

References

Oh I see you used " |last=Granger |first=Susan ", which is a bit better I guess, instead of just "|author=Susan Granger".

I hope there is some helpful info for you here. Basically you should just start at http://elkman.net/nrhp/ or http://elkman.net/nrhp/infobox.php, and search for your NRHP. There is some more info about this at wp:NRHPHELP, too. Any which way you choose to do it, I am just glad you are contributing, and I hope you keep up your good work! cheers, --Doncram (talk) 00:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 03:00, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

OTD June 5

I undid your edit on Selected anniversaries/June 5, because you took out two items that were having significant anniversaries (10th and 30th). I do appreciate the help, though I would prefer if you edit dates that I haven't done yet (in the page history, I'll have an edit with the summary "update for [year]"). Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 15:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

So now I saw your edit on June 4 too. If Tiananmen was eligible again, that pushes Tank Man out of June 5, but the 2009 item still gets priority. Also, three of the items you picked (Daming, Antonio Luna, and Congo Civil War) were on last year, and June 5 happens to have a large pool of eligible articles, so it would be preferable to give some of those other items a chance (see the talk page for each year's change log). Thanks again. —howcheng {chat} 16:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback and for your efforts as well to make the Main Page what it is. Jonathunder (talk) 21:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Mayo Clinic history

Hi, Jonathunder! I requested updates to History at Mayo Clinic. If you are still interested in updating this article, I appreciate your feedback.

Thanks! Audrey at Mayo Clinic (talk) 14:34, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Jonathunder! I updated my requested updates to History at Mayo Clinic based on your thoughts. If you are still interested in updating this article, I really appreciate your feedback. Audrey at Mayo Clinic (talk) 19:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

:(

I've been generally saddened by the resignations in the wake of Framgate, and noticed that you had turned in the admin bit and are planning to step away from this site. While it's been awhile since we crossed paths, I recall you as an outstanding, thoughtful editor and admin, and Wikipedia will be poorer for your absence. I completely understand the reasons behind it—I just wanted to say that you've had a very positive impact here; I will miss running into you here and there, and I wish you luck in whatever you do with your reclaimed Wikipedia time. :) Take care. MastCell ^Talk 23:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Sad to See You Leave

It is with sincere disappointment that I saw that you are phasing out of the project and I will be the first to welcome you back. If you ever find yourself driving through my neck of the woods, my coffee pot is always on! -- Dolotta (talk) 17:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

I shared Dolotta's disappointment, and so I'm happy to see you back. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)