Jamesinhere

Jamesinhere, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jamesinhere! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Audiosolutionz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Audiosolutionz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Razer(talk) 11:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Audiosolutionz (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Audiosolutionz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Audiosolutionz concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Audiosolutionz, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Audiosolutionz

Hello, Jamesinhere. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Audiosolutionz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Clinical coder into Draft:Certified Professional Coder. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
607		Faridabad (talk)	Add sources
289		International Classification of Diseases (talk)	Add sources
422		Professional certification (talk)	Add sources
1,622		Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (talk)	Add sources
13		Khun Hynniewtrep National Awakening Movement (talk)	Add sources
2,321		Anupama Parameswaran (talk)	Add sources
107		Janata Parivar (talk)	Cleanup
11,027		Akshay Kumar (talk)	Cleanup
137		Health information management (talk)	Cleanup
8		Marxist Co-ordination Committee (talk)	Expand
101		Medical classification (talk)	Expand
247		Political families of India (talk)	Expand
1,306		Corporate title (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,540		Medicare (United States) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
437		Sangh Parivar (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
20		Qualifications for professional social work (talk)	Merge
133		Loktantrik Janata Dal (talk)	Merge
16		Puthiya Needhi Katchi (talk)	Merge
94		Revenue cycle management (talk)	Wikify
70		NextGen Healthcare (talk)	Wikify
194		SNOMED CT (talk)	Wikify
4		Ferri Abolhassan (talk)	Orphan
12		National Clinical Coding Qualification (UK) (talk)	Orphan
6		CollaborateMD (talk)	Orphan
5		Machhrauli (talk)	Stub
53		Haryana cricket team (talk)	Stub
196		NISHAD Party (talk)	Stub
25		Jammu and Kashmir People's Conference (talk)	Stub
36		Gondwana Ganatantra Party (talk)	Stub
40		Avtar Singh Bhadana (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
36		Case mix (talk)	Add sources
15		National Secular Conference (talk)	Add sources
26		Giani Zail Singh Campus College of Engineering & Technology (talk)	Add sources
96		Pharmacotherapy (talk)	Add sources
132		All Jharkhand Students Union (talk)	Add sources
114		People's Party of Arunachal (talk)	Add sources
110		Markel Corporation (talk)	Cleanup
24		Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (talk)	Cleanup
147		Mirae Asset Financial Group (talk)	Cleanup
145		Clinical decision support system (talk)	Expand
455		Border (talk)	Expand
2,279		Haryana (talk)	Expand
293		Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
36		Open Dental (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
45		Puthiya Tamilagam (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
330		Respiratory therapist (talk)	Merge
29		AXA Health (talk)	Merge
617		Sharad Yadav (talk)	Merge
20		Alok Mittal (talk)	Wikify
33		Epocrates (talk)	Wikify
254		Oscar Health (talk)	Wikify
7		Post-hospitalist (talk)	Orphan
38		Madam Chief Minister (talk)	Orphan
5		TwinFocus Capital Partners (talk)	Orphan
8		Mandoli, Delhi (talk)	Stub
94		Bharatiya Tribal Party (talk)	Stub
20		Revolutionary Socialist Party (Leninist) (talk)	Stub
52		Congress (Secular) (talk)	Stub
86		ICD-10-CM (talk)	Stub
233		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jamesinhere! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article improvement suggestion - Draft:Certified Professional Coder, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Certified Professional Coder has been accepted

Certified Professional Coder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nightenbelle (talk) 19:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello Jamesinhere. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jamesinhere. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jamesinhere|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 04:12, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi GSS, I am not connected with this company in anyway and directly or indirectly compensated. This is my first page which got approved in wikipedia after months of research around this topic (not to mention various other pages historically I have tried to create and got rejected due to various reason).

You can go through my logs dated back to 2017, where I have added references and bit of editing and learning wikipedia editing since then.

I am really confused with how and what specifies that nature of edits is paid. Is there something I have done which I shouldn't be doing ?

Any reasonable response quite appreciated as I want to improve my knowledge on wikipedia editing.

P.S: I do have some knowledge in medical coding and was doing some research topic finding on which probably I can write something on wikipedia. I have found some other certifications are out there and hence thought I can give a try on this topic.

Nightenbelle approved this article and may be can confirm that I haven't moved to live space and I have followed article for creation process.

Jamesinhere (talk) 15:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

I don't want to stretch this conversation so I'm asking you straight. Are you sure you were not hired through Upwork to edit AAPC (healthcare) and create "Certified Professional Coder"? Please note that I have evidence off-wiki that I will be sharing with admins according to your answer so please be honest. Thank you, GSS ^💬 17:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello GSS - I am 110% + sure that I am not hired through upwork or any other platform. As I mentioned earlier this is something as topic I found via research and feel that I can contribute on Wikipedia and I did it unknowingly that this topic is available for paid contribution.

Here is the link how I landed upon to create this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Certified_professional_coder&action=edit&redlink=1 Jamesinhere (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

On a helping note side, is there any tool on Wikipedia using which I can check that if my next topic "medical coding modifiers" also going to face same issue?

As if that's same case I will research on some other topic.

Pardon me for my limited knowledge on wikipedia system and I am still learning it with the time.

Thanks in advance for your help on this. Jamesinhere (talk) 12:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

The fact that a page was approved because it didn't contain any obvious promotional text or copy righted material does not mean its okay for you to not acknowledge or lie about being a paid contributor. And please don't assume I will have your back because I approved the article. If anything- I'm going to jump up and say woops- I shouldn't have okayed that one- sorry! So I recommend not calling me as a witness when you get brought to the ANI for lying. Thanks! Nightenbelle (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Nightenbelle (talk) - I was not having intention to make you a witness here, I was just trying to make point that I have followed the path of article for creation section and haven't moved article by myself to live space. Jamesinhere (talk) 12:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. GSS ^💬 04:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

COI concerns

Hi Jamesinhere, as you can see above there is a concern that you have a conflict of interest with AAPC (healthcare). Please read WP:COI and WP:PAID carefully and answer the following questions below. I do not need specifics, just a simple yes or no will suffice:

1. Do you, or have you worked for, AAPC in any capacity, whether paid or in a volunteer capacity?
2. Do you, or have you worked for, any company that has been paid to provide services to AAPC in any capacity?
3. Do you know any of the founders or executives of AAPC in a professional or personal manner?

Please note that, per WP:PAID, you are required to disclose if you have been paid by anyone to edit Wikipedia. Answering these questions will help editors establish if you have a conflict of interest with this company. If you have any questions, please post below. Thanks. Z1720 (talk) 15:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

hi Z1720, please find my answer below:

1. Do you, or have you worked for, AAPC in any capacity, whether paid or in a volunteer capacity? - No
2. Do you, or have you worked for, any company that has been paid to provide services to AAPC in any capacity? - No
3. Do you know any of the founders or executives of AAPC in a professional or personal manner? - No

I could be near future customer for AAPC as looking forward to have a career in healthcare. Jamesinhere (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Foundit.in

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Foundit.in requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 12:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Foundit.in (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Foundit.in and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 09:15, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi @CNMall41, Monster.com and foundit are 2 different brands. Monster.com is USA based business and In 2018 Quess Corp acquired Monster's business across India, SE Asia and Middle East and which got re-branded in Nov 2022.

Hence requesting you to please consider foundit as a new brand under Quess corp in India, SE Asia and Middle East market only where as Monster.com still in existence in other geo's. Jamesinhere (talk) 13:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Foundit would not qualify under WP:NCORP as its own page in Wikipedia. Hence the recommendation to merge it. Since you are saying it is not associated with it (despite references causing it to appear they are), then it doesn't appear that foundit it would qualify for any mention in Wikipedia. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi @CNMall41

I have added information on Monster.com page reflecting acquisition by Quess Corp and re-branding in Nov 2022 along with mentions.

I have also updated information in draft version of page along with verifiable sources. Requesting you to please review the same. Jamesinhere (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

What you fail to understand despite the explanation is that this does not meet guidelines for a standalone page. There is no amount of editing that can take place to overcome that. --CNMall41 (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Foundit.in (April 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There is already an article about this company at Monster.com, and the two or three sentences about the name change / rebranding don't show any independent notability for the company under its new name. In addition, almost every sentence in this draft is promotionally written, and could not be used in an encyclopedia article.

bonadea contributions talk 13:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Jamesinhere, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jamesinhere|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 16:37, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Bonadea,

I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits.

I had a discussion with real-time chat help from experienced editors and found the gap that this page missing notability criteria (where atleast 3 notable references are required and mine AFC submission has only one) and you were rights that no amount of editing that can take place to overcome that. I wish if I had received this specific feedback rather than article already exist on monster.com or promotional language.

I think that's the purpose for AFC where other editors and reviewers can help in editing or update information instead of rejecting or marking it for Speedy deletion. Jamesinhere (talk) 14:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Well, sure, if a reviewer sees a draft that is genuinely interesting, they are of course free to improve it – I do that on occasion. But it's not the purpose of AfC. --bonadea contributions talk 18:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Bonadea

The Articles for creation (AfC) process is designed to assist any editor in creating a new page as a draft article, which they can work on and submit for review and feedback when ready.Wikipedia:Articles for creation

Might be my interpretation is wrong here and I have used language which seems promotional in nature.

All in all I have tried to creating a page for company( where various corporate action happened from parent organizations, change in ownership and re-branding) and also is among the top 5 job search engine in India and got re-branded.

1. A well established name in job industry domain and have collaborated with government bodies on some initiatives.

https://www.aicte-india.org/sites/default/files/AICTE%20-%20Monster.com%20MoU.PDF

https://www.aicte-india.org/education/collaborations

https://www.aicte-india.org/bureaus/skill-development (

• Employability Enhancement Training Programme (EETP): For implementation and enhancement of employment opportunities under skill initiatives, the Council has signed MoU’s with following organization under EETP: • AICTE –LinkedIn • AICTE- ICT Academy • AICTE -Monster.com

2. Produce country level (India) job insights tracker on monthly basis (Foundit Insights Tracker) which covered by many top news publications in India. https://www.google.com/search?q=foundit+insights+tracker&rlz=1C1CHBF_enIN1001IN1001&sxsrf=APwXEdeLjs2DxvcxguaoBBi_UO2klzKAMA:1682674708600&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiV-Zzio8z-AhXeU2wGHVksAGwQ_AUoA3oECAIQBQ&biw=1707&bih=781&dpr=0.8

Rejection is fine as long as it come with some advice on what exactly is missing so that person can further research and contribute on wikipedia. Jamesinhere (talk) 09:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Foundit.in has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Foundit.in. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)