User talk:James Allison/Archive 6

Latest comment: 7 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 15 June 2016
Archive 1 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 10

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited La Sierra University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preparatory school. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

Wikidata weekly summary #206

thank you, but . . .

Don't template the regulars. Esrever (klaT) 00:14, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

Wikidata weekly summary #207

A barnstar for you!

  The Barnstar of Diligence
For your long term contribution to Talk:Self-balancing scooter regarding the article's title and the usage of the word "hoverboard." X4n6 (talk) 22:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #208

A barnstar for you!

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your edits and advice on Dr Bailey's age. I have added a reference to the new content. Scadvent (talk) 04:29, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #209

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

Wikidata weekly summary #210

Loma Linda University School of Dentistry

I'm currently working on creating an article for the last of the major Dental Fraternities, which led me to Template:ADADS which led me to trying to get rid of dabs in the template... Which led me to the Loma Linda University School of Dentistry. I agree that the article was the definition of both SPA and COI and that making it into a redirect was a good solution. I've restored it, tried to trim and find references. Let me know if you think it still needs more. As far as I can tell, almost all of the accredited dental schools in the US do have articles.Naraht (talk) 13:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

The ADA and WASC sources do not establish notability, just existence. The school's own website is obviously not enough for notability, and trade journal blogs have also been generally considered not to establish notability. I agree that the sourcing is "weak" -- so weak, in fact, that the page should be merged with the parent university. Long-standing consensus is that degree-granting institutions overall are inherently notable, but there is no similar consensus on internal subunits of those institutions. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 21:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

T. Christian Miller entry

I'd like to fix my wikipedia page entry. I'm not sure what to do, but I do believe the page is well documented with appropriate citations. Tchristianmiller (talk) 21:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

@Tchristianmiller: per Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines, "you should not [...] edit articles about yourself". Generally speaking, editors with conflicts of interest are encouraged to disclose their conflict on the article's talk page and use Template:Request edit to request changes in the article. For more information on how to edit pages about yourself, please see Wikipedia:Contact us - Subjects. In your case, I believe the template requesting more sources may refer to the "Awards" section of the page, in particular, as well as other unsourced statements. Lastly, please remember that I am one of many Wikipedia volunteer editors, and do not have any special status when answering your questions. Wikipedia generally resolves issues through consensus among the editing community at large. If you have further questions, you can place the text {{helpme}} on your own user talk page and a volunteer will assist you. Thank you. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 21:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Metrolink (California)

Thank you for nominating Category:Metrolink (Southern California) to Category:Metrolink (California). Please follow this up with the sub-categories. – Fayenatic London 12:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

Wikidata weekly summary #211

NOTICE

  Please do not revert edits made that conform to Wikipedia's NPOV without providing a valid reason for the revert. Please take into consideration the revisions made for La Sierra University by User:Wiki darpa. Note: User:Wiki darpa is a Wikipedia administrator and a current oversighter to the English Wikipedia. Any disputes will be taken to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee as well as Wikipedia:NPOV_dispute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki darpa (talkcontribs)

You are making baseless threats to cover for your POV edit warring. You are neither an administrator nor an oversighter. This attempt at intimidation is pathetic. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 22:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

 
Hello, James Allison. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wiki darpa.
Message added 10:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 10:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

DEPROD

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Business Expo Center, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-{{prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Adam9007 (talk) 23:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Regarding University of California, Los Angeles#2016 shooting

Hi James Allison. I have replaced the shooting section into the article pending further discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 UCLA shooting. I believe the incident passes the general notability guideline and WP:NEVENT, especially WP:INDEPTH for inclusion on the main UCLA article, but the separate shooting article has been nominated for deletion for not being notable enough to require its own article. Therefore I do not believe WP:NOTNEWS apply here as it is notable enough that alone doesn't stand as a news alert. Please feel free to discuss the content with me if you would like to. Regards, Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 06:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

All of the guidelines you have linked to argue for content inclusion in an article are notability guidelines. Please see WP:NNC for why this is incorrect. In regard to the specific content you have mentioned, please see WP:BALASPS. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 15:13, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Yes, but the same policy you quoted doesn't say why the content shouldn't be included. Once again, it is up to the discussion currently being hashed out at the deletion discussion, but frankly you shouldn't be deleting/reverting stuff considering we have started discussion about it. Once again, WP:NOTNEWS doesn't apply here because it isn't news; the coverage of the piece of information in the shooting article has expanded greatly since it happened, and once again as a piece of historical information linked to the organization it should be covered in some way. Discuss, don't delete. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 02:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Besides, it's very funny, because you quotes WP:BALASPS, which is under WP:NPOV. I don't see why the incident fails NPOV because it's a historical event, it happened, it was covered by media, it is by no means non-notable, and does not misrepresent or puts undue weight on either UCLA, the shooter or the victims. Even if you voted that it should be linked to the history page, as an event that affected UCLA directly, it still needs to be mentioned in brief on the UCLA article with link to the history page, and therefore requires a small section; but the thing is that coverage and significance on media is increasing as we speak, the event is becoming even more notable than was originally construed in the early aftermath of two event. Process is important, and to be honest, you should really discuss about it. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 06:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Finally, you haven't even proven how the content fails NOTNEWS, considering it is no longer a transient, superficial incident and far from being one since the beginning, and is pretty much notable. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 06:32, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

I have no objection to the section as presently written. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 18:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

All right then, I appreciate your agreement on this matter. Thanks once again. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 05:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Napa Rose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast Company. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

Wikidata weekly summary #212

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 91 Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metrolink. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #213

The Signpost: 15 June 2016