Welcome!

Hello, JakeNyg25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Darkness Shines (talk) 22:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011 edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dallas Cowboys, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 11:16, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:39, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Again edit

Sorry I had to report you again to AIV --ChristianandJericho 12:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why edit

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JakeNyg25 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am being blocked the 2nd time and have had been doing no Vandalism since the 1st block was lifted and i am doing a lot more things than vandalism please help :(

Decline reason:

Your only mainspace edit since the first block ended was vandalism, [1] Jac16888 Talk 01:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See [2] for your reason for the blocking --ChristianandJericho 09:46, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JakeNyg25 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do not believe I should be blocked and i would be happy if you have my block lifted so i can contribute to wikipedia again because i am sorry for what i did and ishould not have done it and I admit i did it.

Decline reason:

You were given a second chance, but decided to use it to vandalize again. I see little indication that unblocking this account would benefit the encyclopedia. Kinu t/c 19:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Please do not remove declined unblock requests while you are blocked. --Kinu t/c 05:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • If this is you, please sign in to make this request, and only use one template. That is nothing short of disruptive. Swarm X 06:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

i needed 2 change my user page back 2 the way it was — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.74.20.46 (talk) 06:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JakeNyg25 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock me iam sorry and will not vandalize again

Decline reason:

The blocked editor is required to be the one who places unblock requests - this has been placed by an anonymous IP that cannot be confirmed as the editor. As all unblock requests must carefully follow the instructions in the Guide to Appealing Blocks, this one clearly does not address the issues. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • First, please sign in to confirm that this is your account. Swarm X 07:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

i put the unblock on. Please unblock me so i can help wikipediea and i WILL NOT vandalize anymore because I have learned my lesson.

Jake, you're going to have to do a lot more than just say you won't. You are going to 1) need to explain clearly and specifically what was wrong with what you did before, and 2) provide some detailed information about what you would do on Wikipedia if unblock. In other words, how can you help Wikipedia, and what exactly is vandalism? Qwyrxian (talk) 07:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JakeNyg25 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thank you Qwyrxian How I will help wikipedia is this: 1: Since I have learned my lesson I help make wikipedia a good place for others to learn and share information. 2: Becuase I have learned my lesson against vandalism (in wikipedia, vandalism is the wrongful changing of pages so others can not learn and share information and therefore trying to stop what i will be doing when my block is lifted) I now will try to stop vandalism to make wikipedia a good place where others can learn and share information and also so other users do not have what happened to me (getting blocked) happen to them. Thank you.

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.
  • Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please provide a specific example of edits that you would like to make that would be productive. Your comment here sounds like nothing more than you trying to feed us a line to get access to WP again. To be honest, given how much vandalism you've done, there's a lot of onus on you to explain to us how you've changed. You might even be best off simply walking away from Wikipedia for a few months before trying again. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:35, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Again edit

I took the sugested break and read the ways i might be unblocked and i choose the one were I pick some pre-exsisting articles to improve those articles would be one's that have to do with Football and my favorite team in that sport the New York Giants who just won the super bowl :) .if you see this i hope i get unblocked so i can help the wikiediea community after 4 months of being banned from wikipedia.

Also the users JakeNyg26 JakeNyg27 JakeNyg28 JakeNyg29 and Josh steel and only one of them (the last one i mentioned) seems to be a real user to me

First, just as before, you need to sign in to this account (i.e., not edit as an IP address). Second, you need to follow the instructions that Beeblebrox gave. Or I can make it even simpler: please identify at least one article, and, right here, on this talk page, give an example of exactly one edit you would make if unblocked. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

An edit i would make edit

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JakeNyg25 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

matured, ready to edit again, have ideas of what I would edit

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 13:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well its been awhile since I've been here but i am looking to get back into editing on Wikipedia and I've found that an edit i would make (as suggested above) would be to the page of Vasilios Koutsianikoulis as his page seems to be google translated and contains many grammatical errors. Also I'm interested in making edits to music pages.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JakeNyg25 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

gave edit example JakeNyg25 (talk) 15:27, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your edits were entirely trivial and didn't even follow the instructions we gave you. Yamla (talk) 15:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vasilios Koutsianikoulis (Greek: Βασίλης Κουτσιανικούλης; born 9 August 1988) is a Greek footballer who currently plays for AE Larissa in the Greek Football League as a Left winger / Attacking Midfielder. He is a left footed winger that can play either on the left or right wing.

Clubs edit

Iraklis Chalkis edit

Koutsianikoulis began his career at Iraklis Chalkis, a Delta Ethniki team based in Larissa, where Nikos Nioplias, the coach of the Greece U19 team first noticed him.

Ergotelis edit

Before the under 19 tournament he signed a contract with Ergotelis, despite the interest from OFI. Koutsianikoulis had traveled to Heraklion in April 2007 to be watched by the OFI coach, Reiner Maurer in a friendly against Ergotelis. Despite his good performance, the German coach did not make a decision quick enough and Ergotelis signed him instead. During the 2007–08 Greece Superleague season, he played in 12 games (10 as a substitute) for a total of 126 minutes, but did not score.

During the 2008–09 Greece Superleague season he became a starter. He impressed in the 3–0 victory against Aris with an assist. He then scored 2 goals and registered one assist against Panathinaikos, and also scored another goal against the champions Olympiacos F.C.. His performances led fans and press to start calling him "The Greek Messi" or "Messi of the poor" due to his playing style which was reminiscent to the Argentinian's. Eventually Otto Rehhagel called him to the Greece National Team and he became a target for major clubs in Greece.

PAOK edit

On 22 May 2009, after Olympiacos and Panathinaikos had tried to sign Koutsianikoulis, Ergotelis and PAOK reached an agreement for Koutsianikoulis to sign for the Thessaloniki team from Summer 2009 onwards on a 4-year contract.[1] The deal included a payment of €1,200,000 to Ergotelis and a [[Exhibition_game|friendly match)] between the two teams.

Koutsianikoulis did not manage to impress the PAOK coach Fernando Santos, and most of his appearancess in the 2009–10 were from the bench. Towards the end of the season he had some good performances, leaving fans with a positive feeling about his future in the club.

OFI Crete edit

His fine form led toAEK being interested in signing him. According to AEK president Thomas Mavros, he was keen to join Vangelis Vlachos’ side, and confirmed he has met with the player’s agent. AEK weredesperate to strengthen a squad decimated by the departure of many key players this summer in an attempt to address their debts and financial troubles.

Eventually, Koutsianikoulis snubbed AEK Athens in favour of a move to OFI Crete. The Cretans have confirmed that the 24-year-old has joined OFI on a free transfer after leaving local rivals Ergotelis, with whom he had just finished a second spell. Reports had linked Koutsianikoulis with both AEK and OFI in the past weeks and it seemed the Athenian club had convinced the Greek youth international to join, despite their well documented financial troubles. However, the winger has decided to play for OFI, who recently secured a license from the tax office to take part in the Greek Super League this season.[2]

On 20 August 2012, Koutsianikoulis signed with OFI on a 3-year contract.[3] He made his debut with the club on August 2012 in a 0-0 home draw against Xanthi and he scored on 29 October 2012 in a 2-2 home draw against Panetolikos.

On 21 March 2015, OFI announced that they are withdrawing immediately from the Greek Super League criticising the top-flight circuit for “unfair and uneven decisions” against the club and Koutsianikoulis is looking for the next club to continue his career.[4]

Koutsianikoulis initially agreed on 27 June 2015 to join Veria F.C. [5] but eventually the deal was not fulfilled.

AEL F.C. edit

On 3 September 2015, Koutsianikoulis signed a three year contract with Greek Football League club Larissa for an undisclosed fee. [6] At the end of season, he celebrated the championship as Larissa was promted to Super League.

National team edit

Nikos Nioplias coach of the Greece U19 was impressed with his skills and included him in the squad that played in the 2007 UEFA European Championship. Koutsianikoulis played for one half against Spain in the group stage and then appeared as a second half substitute in the final against Spain again where Greece lost 1–0. The 20-year-old Koutsianikoulis, who has featured previously in the Greece Under-21 squad, roseto prominence in Ergotelis's 3-2 triumph over Panathinaikos at the Olympic Stadium in late October. He was rewarded with a place in Otto Rehhagel's 20-man group for a friendly against Italy on 19 May 2008 at the Georgios Karaiskakis stadium in Piraeus, but did not play.[7]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

JakeNyg25 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

made edit with very good contributions to article, with full infobox and over half a dozen sources added

Accept reason:

Unblocked. Welcome back. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Reaper Eternal: - would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 01:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

No, definitely not. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Doubts Even Here edit

"JakeNyg25"
Song

"Doubts Even Here", originally called "Tiny Tim" [6], is the seventh track of eight on New Order's debut album Movement, released on November 13, 1981. After the death of Joy Division singer Ian Curtis, the surviving members formed New Order with drummer Stephen Morris's girlfriend Gillian Gilbert joining five months later. This led to a dispute over who should fill Curtis' shoes with the lead vocalist role. All three male members were in contention, but due to Bernard Sumner's voice being significantly different from Curtis', New Order opted for him to take the role, wanting New Order's sound to be different from Joy Division's. Ironically with this new vocalist, in addition to "Doubts Even Here", the first track ("Dreams Never End") on the first album recorded by New Order, Movement, is sung by bassist Peter Hook with spoken contributions by Gillian Gilbert, reading from the Bible. The song starts off with an array of electronic percussion noises before slow synth and bass riffs enter, which eventually pick up speed later in the song[7]. The lyrics were written by Stephen Morris. The song has not been performed live since a few performances in 1981. [8]

References

  1. ^ "34 Years Ago: New Order Emerge From Joy Division With 'Movement'". Diffuser. Diffuser.fm. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
  2. ^ "New Order Back Catalogue Reissues". The Quietus. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
  3. ^ "Adrian's Album Reviews New Order". Adrian's Album Reviews. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
  4. ^ "Doubts Even Here". AllMusic. Rovi Corporation. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
  5. ^ "Movement - New Order Songs, Reviews, Credits AllMusic". allmusic.com. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
  6. ^ "New Order: 10 of the best". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 November 2016.}
  7. ^ "Doubts Even Here". NewOrderTracks. WordPress. 7 March 2016. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
  8. ^ "New Order: 10 of the best". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 November 2016.}

Official versions edit

  • Album version – 4:16

Remixes edit

  • "Doubts Even Here" (Razed Club Mix) (unofficial remix by Razed in a New Division of Agony) – 4:32

Covers by other artists edit

  • Harry on Essence (New Order Tribute) – 3:46
  • Phantom West on Community 2: A NewOrderOnline Tribute – 4:18
  • Philip Eno as an entry for the Community 2 contest – 4:02
  • Razed in a New Division of Agony on Ceremony: A New Order Tribute and their upcoming debut album – 4:33
  • Vibrissae on Dreams Never End - A Tribute to New Order – 6:00

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disorder (song) (January 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! JakeNyg25, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disorder (Joy Division song) (January 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
joe deckertalk 01:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)Reply