User talk:Jac16888/Archive 9

Wikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

• Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
• News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
• Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

david (talk) 17:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC) I'm on a learning curve at present and notice you have deleted an entry (my first attempt on Wikipedia) on Corentyne High School because of "Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://chs-jccss.org/blog/about/". I'm guessing that your view is that I have lifted the content of the Wikipedia entry in part from the chs-jccss link above and that is correct although the author was acknowledged in the Wikipedia entry and has permitted this. Not sure what else I'm supposed to do but thought I would leave this message while you are enjoying your Wikibreak. As I said I'm on a learning curve but I'll try and copy this into your Talk page too. Have a good time away. David. david (talk) 17:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

• Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
• News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

• News and notes: Jackson's death, new data center, more
• Wikipedia in the news: Google News Support, Wired editor plagiarizes Wikipedia, Rohde's kidnapping, Michael Jackson
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

• News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:PNT

Yikes... That's what I get for not completely reading directions! Thanks for the info!  _{Guy M | Talk}  12:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Need Help with Move

Please assist with move of a subpage to User Page (Abcdefg/Mark) in order to move Live on Wikipedia. I am not sure if you deleted this article or not but I am not clear on how to move live.--Abcdefg35 (talk) 13:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Yaay!

Wow, that's the closest to a real block I've had in my entire career LOL! I might move that one over to my userpage as something "special" (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:52, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Removal of tags from Van Gink with summary "rv copyvio content"

Hello Jack.

I added some tags to the article about the "Van Gink" automobile. But when I looked through the revision history of the article, I noticed that YOU made another edit to this article. So I checked the page again, and *poof*, the tags were gone.

The summary to the edit was "rv copyvio content". I also noticed that the "references" were removed as well.

There's a couple of things I would like to say:

Why remove the tags from the article? It still has some issues (e.g. It's too short, not notable, etc.)

Please take this into consideration. Thank you, -calvinps- (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Um, The dutch content was copy and pasted from another website, all I did was revert to the version before it was added, I'll admit I didn't bother to re-add the tags, its no big deal to re-add them--Jac16888^Talk 18:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Motto of the Day

Hi there, Jac16888! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –pjoef (talk • contribs) 12:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Russian submarine Kazan

Translate characteristics of submarine and fill Infobox. Possible sources: [1] and [2].--Andrey! 16:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Thats not the way the translate tag is to be used, its for translating non-english content which has been added. If you have non-english sources, either translate the info yourself and add it with the source as a cite or find an english source--Jac16888^Talk 16:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Correct, that it was clear to the one who is able to do it.--Andrey! 16:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

sorry but, what?--Jac16888^Talk 16:38, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

• From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
• Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
• Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
• Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
• News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
• Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 10:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

RadioFan

I see a user created an attack page in my honor. I appreciate you removing that page and see that this user has been banned. I'd like to see the contents of that page if possible.--RadioFan (talk) 12:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

sent you an email. Congratulations by the way, getting an attack page means you're doing something right :)--Jac16888^Talk 12:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!--RadioFan (talk) 13:36, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Deletion

Thanks for the speedy response to my post about Clement Hernandez. I was wondering, since it was created once before and deleted, do you think it should be protected to stop recreationS? Martin Raybourne (talk) 14:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I'd say its not necessary, the creations were 6 months apart, and its only been created twice, normally create protection is for where an article is created many times in a short space of time--Jac16888^Talk 14:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

neftunes?

why was this entry deleted please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.213.24.254 (talk) 17:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Because the subject had achieved nothing to make them notable, there were not sources, and the article was copy and pasted from myspace--Jac16888^Talk 17:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

hi, need explaination plz

hi, I have created while ago a page called (samutorrents.com), then it got deleted by u with that note,,

Article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

Im sorry but im still new on this and i have no idea what i have missed, Im admin for that site and we thought of making this page to support our site,, i understood that i didnt make something like copyright,, can i know how to do that as i cant find such otion for it and i was attending to do two pages for my two sites, but i have no clue what should i do to prevent deleting or any action of that kind...

I will be grateful to tell me,

Thank u in advance --User:Sarah.gkhia 00:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Two reasons. Firstly, there are billions of websites out there, probably hundreds of thousands of torrent sites, we can't possibly have an article on every single one of them. Therefore for a website to have an article on wikipedia, it has to be notable. Secondly, wikipedia articles are not for support, they are supposed to be informative not promotional, the fact that you're closely related to the site means you should not be writing about it, you have a clear conflict of interest--Jac16888^Talk 01:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

--- thanks fo reply, so, i wont create such thing again as it is against ur policy, but i guess u got me wrong as i wanted whoever search for our site find some sourse to lead them, if they didnt find it directly, anyways, thanks for ur relpy, and all the best.--Sarah.gkhia (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Love? Visual Novel Page Delete

Hi

I would like to know why my page for "Love?" has been deleted. If I did not comply with any guidelines could you let me know as i wanted to post the page for specific information on the title NOT as advertisement.

Thanks for any help

Tecnuro (talk) 00:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

The Football Ramble

Hullo mate, just wondering where the football ramble page has gone. I LITERALLY cannot understand why it's been deleted. It was a lovely little article, with cross-referenced links to sources. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.70.51.38 (talk) 19:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

No idea, I assume you mean this, The Football Ramble, which was nothing to do with me--Jac16888^Talk 21:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

• News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
• Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Bluemarine

I am sorry, but a short block for [3] is disgusting, and taken with the prohibition on Allstarecho complaininmg about personal attacks and attacks on gay men in general by Bluemarine leaves a foul taste in the mouth. DuncanHill (talk) 19:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

huh? I wasn't aware of any of the background or anything when I made that block, he put a helpme up, i saw the comment and responded with the block. Although in hindsight considering that he has a whole arbcom and huge ani discussion going on I wouldn't feel comfortable making any kind of long block --Jac16888^Talk 20:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

The situation now is that Bluemarine gets short blocks for calling another editor a pervert (a personal attack not just on that editor but on all other gay editors), and since that spat on his talk page his victim has been banned from commenting on him anywhere - he isn't even allowed to complain about further personal abuse from Bluemarine. You made the block before the ban on Allstarecho, so I do not blame you for that, but please, keep a very close eye on Bluemarine as he will repeat his homophobic behaviour and personal attacks. Another editor today was indef blocked for calling someone a cunt, so 72 hours for something much worse looks very poor indeed. DuncanHill (talk) 20:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Of course. I'll admit I wasn't aware that allstar is gay when I blocked, so I didn't realise it was also a homophobic attack, my apologies for that--Jac16888^Talk 20:26, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 20:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Why was the Mike Faith page deleted?

You deleted the page below on 2009-06-26:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_faith

Can you explain why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.13.247.134 (talk) 20:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Because it was a broken redirect to Michael G. Faith, which was deleted here--Jac16888^Talk 21:03, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Restore FrancisLightHouse Vs Wikipedia?

Is it possible to restore FrancisLightHouse Vs Wikipedia? Right now I have suspected this IP user of having at least 4 sock puppet accounts. And most of the evidence is in the history of that page. PopMusicBuff ^talk 01:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I really prefer not to, it was pure vandalism, we can't keep that kind of thing around. Is there something you need to know about it or do you just want it as evidence? If its just as evidence it doesn't matter since any admin can see its deleted history anyway. Its creator this time was User talk:FLHWEBUSVA, who I just blocked based on what you've told me.--Jac16888^Talk 01:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I think I have enough evidence now at User talk:96.249.235.100. ALl four of them seem to be connected in one way or another. PopMusicBuff ^talk 01:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

speedy del tags

Thank you for your explanation. I hope to see your comments on WP:AFD later. Kraxler (talk) 15:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jac16888. You have new messages at Junkcops's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Junk Police (reports|works) 02:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Scrubs

Hey i can see that you like scrubs like me so i am try in to make the critic reasponse but i do not now how to do it right, will you help me?. -- Pedro J (talk) 03:11, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

It was a vandal from it.wikipedia. --Guidomac (talk) 23:21, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

No worries, I figured it was something like that--Jac16888^Talk 23:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Monsters, Inc. character redirect deletions

Why did you delete redirects such as Mike Wazowski instead of retargeting them to Monsters, Inc.? Powers ^T 16:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Never occured to me to be honest--Jac16888^Talk 16:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. =) Powers ^T 17:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletions

Hello, can you clarify the rationale behind the deletions of Portal:Gene Wiki/PDB and Portal:Gene Wiki/SCOP? Although you listed it as WP:CSD#G8, I don't think they applied... Thanks, AndrewGNF (talk) 21:16, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Inter-wiki redirects such as those are viewed as broken by the system and don't work as redirects, the MediaWiki software is set to disallow hard-redirects between projects. The proper thing to do is to use soft redirects--Jac16888^Talk 21:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Bummer, okay then... Can you restore those two and I will change them to soft redirects immediately? I want to make sure I get the link targets correct. Thanks, AndrewGNF (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done--Jac16888^Talk 22:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

• Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
• News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Removal of your comment from my Talk page.

You wrote this. Thank you for your kind comment. As I wrote in the edit summary removing the comment, turnabout is fair play, but does not usually resolve disputes. My point actually is to fully accept what the IP editor has been trying to say for so long, and turn it into something positive, such that every time the editor says it, it brings some very good thoughts to mind. There is also a possibility that the editor will actually realize something new for him, that wouldn't hurt either. I very much appreciate your support, but I don't want to turn this into a battle, the opposite, I want to turn it into a conclusive closure, and there is a possibility of that if it doesn't become, "No, you are scum." We are a collection of pots and kettles, and it's about time we started cooking, instead of arguing about who is the blackest. I hope this brings a smile to your face. Thanks again. --Abd (talk) 15:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

ah, didn't see your summary. Ah well, i understand what you're trying to do, and it did bring a smile to my face actually. I wish you best of luck with this--Jac16888^Talk 16:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

RE: السيد علي بن السيد إسحاق الحسيني البلادي

Unless you speak Arabic, you have no idea what the article is about, or if it is asserting notability. I think your deletion of the article without some sort of understanding of the subject matter was inappropriate. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 18:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

I volunteer at WP:PNT and have much experience with foriegn articles actually and use a variety of machine translators to see the subject of articles. The article did not suggest any notability of the subject, hence the deletion. I didn't mean to wheel war with you though, I missed that you restored it, I thought the author had recreated it--Jac16888^Talk 18:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for clearing that up for me. I've encountered experienced editors before who were adamant that because they couldn't read the text, that was in itself a lack of an assertion of notability. They never bothered to figure it out. Thanks again! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 18:28, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

no problem--Jac16888^Talk 18:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Text from Deleted Page

on 7/31 I created an informational description for Global datavault an online backup company. It was speedy deleted and I dont know why. Can you send me the text that I submitted, I can not find it. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshMcCoy (talk • contribs) 22:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Done, and your article was deleted because it was blatant advertising--Jac16888^Talk 22:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Evolution / changes

Do you agree that Territorial evolution of the World is an unwanted fork of List of World map changes? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Voila Screen Capture page

Hello Sir/ Madam

I had created a page in 'my talk' about a screen capture utility as per the guidelines. Then I moved the page as Voila Screen Capture - following the instructions. I saw that you have deleted the page with a G8 check point. I could not understand clearly after going through it. Please let me know, what went wrong and what should be the first step before I start a contribution?

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Globaldelighttech (talk • contribs) 05:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

I didn't actually delete your page. It was moved to Voila screen capture which was deleted by another admin. This left a broken redirect on User talk:Globaldelighttech which is why I deleted it--Jac16888^Talk 15:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

deleting of the page of Nazaria pakistan trust

dear

u deleting the page of Nazaria Pakistan Trust

please tell me what is the problem in this page.

thanx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.27.160.197 (talk) 05:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

I deleted it because it was a copyright violation, copied from another website. Wikipedia cannot accept content illegally copied from other sources--Jac16888^Talk 15:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

• From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
• Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
• News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Mahamandaleshwar Swami Nityananda

Mahamandaleshwar Swami Nityananda Thanks for removing the tag there. I deliberately left it on until there was discussion at PNT. SimonTrew (talk) 11:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for fixing that. I didn't realize I had saved it; I was planning to get to it later today. You could have just blanked the page, I would not have been upset. — Carl (CBM · talk) 22:16, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

nah no worries. Better this way, no chance of upsetting someone if I just fix it--Jac16888^Talk 22:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

You failed to see an attack page because you don't understand

You failed. You failed to see an attack page because it is not YOU that's being attacked. It's not you being implicated. Admins are extremely subjective in "seeing" attack pages. For example, User:Dlohcierekim once deleted my userbox in my user page because it accused raytheon ceo of being a cheaper despite article raytheon stating as much. User:Dlohcierekim then changed his mind about the deletion but the appeal to undelete was denied by another admin. Very subjective. Now you fail to see the personal attacked. You failed to do your job and protect from personal attacks, it's my perspective not yours what determines a personal attack, your subjective interpretation of WP:personal attacks is incorrect, it's my reputation not yours and is why you didn't care. It's why you did not take the time to consider the entire case. Henry Delforn (talk) 19:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Now that, that's a personal attack. The page you want deleted was NOT an attack, it was a comment on the source of the article. You need to calm down and not get so worked up about things, I did my job properly and did not just decline it on a whim, I looked into it properly, which is why I am able to reply to you without having to go back and look it up. If the talk page had been, "henry is a plagiariser who stole this content because hes a big thief" that would be an attack, However he did not comment on you whatsoever. Furthermore, on seeing your response to his comment he responded that the article was fine. Get over yourself and stop being so damn petty--Jac16888^Talk 11:09, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Protected Territorial evolution of the World

I know this article has been protected. I was about to make more changes. I now cannot make changes on my own page, because it is protected. Please, and seriously, un-protect. The spesh man (talk) 21:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Scrubs Premise

I keep reverting you, because having a premise makes the page more organized and easier to understand. And just because those shows but have premises on there pages doesn't mean that they all don't, if fact most do, so that's my very good reason. Now I ask that you stop changing the page. Mr. Chicago (talk) 16:29, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Your right, I do hope that you can forgive me for being so rude. Mr. Chicago (talk) 00:37, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

It's alright, no hard feels. Mr. Chicago (talk) 15:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Invalid user category

Hi. Thanks for your involvement with Bus_Master-Transit_Bus. I see that this user has created a category for his subpages Category:Bus_Master-Transit_Bus. I would do a category for deletion nomination, but I don't feel like getting attacked again. Is there a way you can delete it as an admin? Thanks.Clubmarx (talk) 03:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I saw that but decided it might be best to leave it for now, its not hurting anything and if I delete it now he'll probably get worked up again--Jac16888^Talk 03:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Abandoning account

Hi I'm abandoning my old account. I was wondering if you could generate a list of user pages which either having User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld, Blofeld of SPECTRE or Dr. Blofeld attached to them. I'm just cleaning out before I leave this account as I had a lot of stray work pages.. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Theres no special admin thing that lets you do that, just use Special:PrefixIndex. Glad to hear you're not leaving us altogether--Jac16888^Talk 11:48, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Note

There are responses to your question left on Mifter's talk page. Best, Xenophrenic (talk) 02:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Jac16888. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

• News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
• Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback @ Philosopher

Hello, Jac16888. You have new messages at Philosopher's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User:Mathsci/WR

Page appears to be a verbise accusation of misconduct against user Abd. Winnipeg wombat (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

and you appear to have a good grasp of wikipedia for someone with so few edits. And since its a list of comments made by abd, I doubt he can complain--Jac16888^Talk 20:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Solar Neighbourhoods

Sure it's fine? Granted, I tagged based on the fact that it's a joint project of Toronto_Atmospheric_Fund which was deleted for being spammish, so I had my suspicions. Maybe someone should just watch the page to be sure? -WarthogDemon 20:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

well, It has a lot of links from important sounding groups, which I'll admit I didn't check, but it didn't seem speedyable to me. You're welcome to try a prod or afd it--Jac16888^Talk 20:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

A bit of fun

Just wanted to tell you I was only having some fun at a friend with "mooly." I intended to delete it myself. Thanks for all the good work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaskavist (talk • contribs) 20:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

And also, I just figured out signing Alaskavist (talk) 20:43, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

you can't delete things yourself, you need to be an admin. And please don't create nonsense articles for fun, bear in mind that anyone can see them, and that this is a serious encyclopedia, not a playground--Jac16888^Talk 20:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

I just assumed that I could delete whatever I created. Sorry. I won't play around anymore. Just out of curiosity, how did you get to that so fast, it was up for just a few minutes? Alaskavist (talk) 21:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. What happened is there are a lot of editors out there who are dedicated to protecting what we've got going here, that means monitoring all changes made by watching special:Recent changes and making sure all edits are ok, either manually, or some users use programs to help. One of those many editors spotted your page as soon as it was created, and tagged it for deletion. This came up on my watchlist straightaway as I use a script to alert me about pages of that type, so I deleted it immediately.--Jac16888^Talk 21:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Mac Garden

Hi, could I please have a copy of the Macintosh Garden page you deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wishstik (talk • contribs) 12:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Mat Benote

I believe you deleted the page for the artist known as Mat Benote. This story appeared on the news recently, which I think counters the rationale you gave for deleting the page. Due to the nature of the artist, and his ability to remain a clandestine figure, it seems this is enough to ratify his data. Please reinstate the page. Thanks.

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/video?id=6982617

The Pleonasmicist 66.37.250.158 (talk) 13:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

MCC

It's back: [4] Wknight94 ^talk 16:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

seen it, reverted it and watchlisted it. Cheers--Jac16888^Talk 17:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Loch Ness Monster

Thank you for protecting the article, Loch Ness Monster. I wanted to add to the top of the article that little itty bitty silver padlock symbol that indicates that the article is semi-protected, but cannot for the life of me remember the appropriate template. Do you recall which one it is? Thanks! — SpikeToronto (talk) 20:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

aha, found it, ironically at the top of the protection page, its {{pp-template}}--Jac16888^Talk 20:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Y Done Thanks! — SpikeToronto (talk)

Gideon v. Wainwright

Would you consider placing a semi-protect on Gideon v. Wainwright for excessive vandalism? Several registered editors, including myself, are becoming rather occupied reverting the strangest vandalism edits on it, over and over. Thanks! — SpikeToronto (talk) 01:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

bugger, forgot to answer. I don't think protection is really necessary for that page, the vandalism isn't that persistent--Jac16888^Talk 19:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Email

I'm writing you email. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:05, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

okeydokey--Jac16888^Talk 21:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

got it and replied to your secrety admin email. Not sure that wikipedia is ready for the revolution yet, perhaps if Jimbo starts to lose some support and J. delanoybot gets exposed we might stand a chance. In the meantime, stay strong comrade --Jac16888^Talk 21:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Scrubs

I am looking to get Scrubs to a GA and i know it will take a lot of work but with help it cam be done, do you want to help me. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 19:10, 28 August 2009 (UTC)