JLo-Watson

{{help}}

Hi please can you add is an American politician in the introduction of the Donald Trump article just like how you added nationality to Kim Jong Un. It is more clearer and it creates better grammar. I would appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.90.39.11 (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

There is consensus at Talk:Donald_Trump#Current_consensus (specifically point 17) which provides the currently-preferred form of the first paragraph. Feel free to raise it on the talk page of that article if you wish to suggest and gain consensus for an alternate version. stwalkerster (talk) 19:59, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Totally and unequivocally agree with stwalkerster. This has been discussed at length on the talk page of Donald Trump. Please consider discussing with the editors of that page, and not me because I will certainly not be conducting such a disruptive edit without consensus or my agreement Thanks. JLo-Watson (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:First Lady of North Korea has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:First Lady of North Korea. Thanks! Bradv 16:13, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments and your feedback which is greatly appreciated. I have editied the draft page with additional references. Thanks! JLo-Watson (talk) 17:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: First Lady of North Korea has been accepted

First Lady of North Korea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bradv 23:39, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Excellent, thank you so much for your help and support! JLo-Watson (talk) 11:56, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Alun Davies (politician) - and other politicans

Hi, thanks for your edit to this page yesterday. There's a lot of inconsistency and gaps in the pages of various Welsh Politicians, something I'm trying to address.

Is there an agreement on which office should appear at the top of the info box? Using the example of Alun Davies, he's been a junior minister twice and a cabinet minister twice as well as being elected to two seats in the Assembly - A total of six offices, one of which he still holds. Should the current one be at the top? What do you personally think about including his three other ministerial offices in the info box (2 junior posts and one other cabinet level post)? Littlemonday (talk) 11:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for your message. What tends to be the case with political articles is that we put recent offices at the top of the info-box; even if they are no longer incumbent office holders, and the constituencies remain at the bottom of the info-box. I think this practice should continue. So that being said, I would go with the most recent office other than AM held i.e. Local Government Cabinet Sec at the top, followed by other ministerial/junior ministerial offices previously held; followed by the current AM role. Best Wishes JLo-Watson (talk) 23:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Sri Lanka

Hi Rajapakse term ended en 14 November. See Parliament website. Also, it was only chairman G. L. Peiris's opinion in your article. So if we consider that Rajapakse is still in office we should also add that Wickremesinghe is still in power. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello there. Mahinda Rajapaksa remains Prime Minister until he steps down. He remains PM, and under all legal citations Wickremesinghe was in fact simply dismissed, and Rajapaksa was appointed in his place by the President. In regards to his term ending on November 14th 2018, that is incorrect. The Courts simply suspended his duties and responsibilities as leader; however, he from that period he remained Prime Minister albeit in a position without the full duties and powers. JLo-Watson (talk) 23:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

He have just resigned. And for the challenging against Wickremesinghe's dismissal? But Rajapaksa have just resigned today. --Panam2014 (talk) 01:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Speakers & majority leaders

Howdy, the additions you're making to the Speakers & majority leader areas, are only confusing. House Speaker & House Majority leader are separate positions, which aren't held by the same person. GoodDay (talk) 01:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Example: When you added Dennis Hastert to John Boehner's infobox. You added him as Leader, that's confusing. You should've added Hastert as Speaker. GoodDay (talk) 02:04, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Agreed - I’ll begin implementing the role of Speaker instead. Thanks JLo-Watson (talk) 12:05, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Intro to Nancy Pelosi

Howdy. The House of Representatives have not yet voted for Speaker. One only becomes speaker-designate, following one's election & before one's sworn-in. This won't occur until January 3, 2019. Right now, there's two candidate for the speakership (Nancy Pelosi & Kevin McCarthy). Even though it's highly likely that Pelosi will be elected (due to Democrats having the majority), we still went until the election actually occurs :) GoodDay (talk) 14:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Hey there. Good to hear from you again, its great to have positive co-operation/discussion between editors. With this being said, I believe the terminology you have used is incorrect here. Pelosi has been widely-referred to as 'Speaker-designate'. Indeed, the official Democratic Leader website has changed as a result (See www.democraticleader.gov). If you look at the official speaker designate article, you will see that it states "Speaker-designate is a member of the United States House of Representatives or other lower house who has been selected by the caucus of the majority party to be nominated as Speaker of the House, but who has not yet taken office or been elected by the full House of Representatives, as it is still occupied by the previous Speaker" - essentially meaning that Speaker-designate becomes applicable when re-elected leader of the House Democrats, as she was weeks ago, as they are the Party with the majority so she will essentially become Speaker if Dems vote her way. This differs from the position of 'speaker-elect' which is applicable when she has actually been elected by the House of Representatives and has not yet taken the oath of office from the Dean of the United States House of Representatives. Obviously, it is just hours away before her extraordinarily-likely second term as Speaker, so I don't really believe that having my lede paragraph up there really matters too much, so I will restore it based on this. If you object/revert that is absolutely fine as I appreciate your comment, and after all, it will be resolved on the 3rd anyway and the paragraph I edited would be applicable anyway Thanks :) @GoodDay: JLo-Watson (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

I improved the wording & added similar info to McCarthy's intro. Both are nominees for the Speakership. GoodDay (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Note: We don't have such intries for Chuck Grassley & Patrick Leahy, the nominees for President pro tempore of the United States Senate. -- GoodDay (talk) 21:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Excellent. Good compromise and clarified both misconceptions. Thanks! JLo-Watson (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Not trying to be argumentative, both I don't see the issue with pointing out that Pelosi is both a two-time House Speaker and two-time Minority Leader. Never assume that the reader can just "figure it out for themselves", as no two readers are alike. Just trying to add some info that is actually pertinent as it's not often that someone has multiple stints in these roles. Vjmlhds (talk) 20:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you for expanding the 'List of resignations from the second May ministry' to include resignations from Lords - myself and I suspect many others had completely overlooked this! Thank you! Anonymoose. .helper (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Corbyn Shadow Cabinet has been accepted

Template:Corbyn Shadow Cabinet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:22, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 24 September 2020

As an editor in good standing, would you mind looking at and hopefully closing the move discussion on Talk:Richard Leonard (Scottish politician). I will be happy to move the page and disambiguation page and add hatnotes. Alex (talk) 19:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know Alex, I agree. Have responded to the talk discussion. JLo-Watson (talk) 21:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Pete Buttigieg

I did do some digging and Buttigieg is the youngest Secretary of Transportation cabinet member and the youngest in Biden's Cabinet. I also found out it was Alexander Hamilton that was the youngest Cabinet Secretary. I looked up Attorney General and it is one of the highest Cabinet level positions. However it still is not a Secretary Cabinet position just a high level Cabinet position. Buttigieg will technically be the second youngest after Hamilton. He out beats Castro who was 39 years 10 months while Buttigieg is 39 years 2 weeks old.Welcometothenewmillenium (talk) 00:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I did put in the article that Buttigieg was the youngest member of Biden’s Cabinet (not as a whole) but it was removed by another user so perhaps consult them JLo-Watson (talk) 01:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

On further notice, I dispute that. Attorney General is the Head of the Department of Justice. It is not Cabinet level it is a Cabinet Secretary JLo-Watson (talk) 01:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

JLo-Watson Thank you for clearing that up we shall see if someone reverts it.Welcometothenewmillenium (talk) 03:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

JLo-Watson May I ask if it would be alright to put that Pete Buttigieg is the youngest Secretary of Transportation in U.S. I know that we came to an agreement that Alexander Hamilton and Robert F. Kennedy were the youngest Cabinet secretaries in U.S. history. I wanted to ask you if saying Buttigieg is the youngest Secretary of Transoprtion in U.S. History is okay. He is the youngest Secretary of Transportation in history according to an article that says it true.Welcometothenewmillenium (talk) 14:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Welcometothenewmillenium Shouldn't see a problem with that as long as you can find a suitable reference! JLo-Watson (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex Salmond scandal has been accepted

Alex Salmond scandal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Premiership of Nicola Sturgeon

Hi,

Premiership of Nicola Sturgeon which you suggested on Nicola Sturgeon’s talk page has been created. It contains the content from the first minister section of Nicola Sturgeon’s article. Could you amend it accordingly so it’s not the same? Thank you. 2A00:23C5:2C01:9501:18B7:658A:A39C:62EA (talk) 00:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

de facto Deputy Prime Ministers

Hi JLo. A couple of weeks ago, we added de facto Deputy Prime Minister to Willie Whitelaw's infobox. I think that this was a positive edit and I wondered what you thought about adding de facto deputy to more infoboxes. I think that the main task in doing so would be to determine who these de facto deputies are. I have been collating lists of unofficial deputies over the past couple of months here, which might be of use, as before any edits take place it probably needs to be determined exactly who does and doesn't qualify and I was hoping that you could help me with this, if you agree that it would be a good idea. Thanks! FollowTheTortoise (talk) 19:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Tortoise, yes I agree with you that this could be a useful addition for readers! I will have a look at your list of unofficial deputies. The most obvious issue which immediately comes to mind for me is the predecessors/successors. For example, take Nick Clegg, an official DPM. Do we then say Green, Lidington etc are "successors"? Or perhaps do we not include them as predecessors/successors in the infoboxes of the official DPMs and merely just put the "defacto" role in the infoboxes of the relevant individuals , i.e. Lidington.

As I am sure you can imagine, this could create a bit of confusion . Or perhaps, could this be rectified by using footnotes in the infobox. For example, many DPMs already have the "Office vacant" hatnotes etc. Could we then include the de facto deputies as "successors" etc through an explainer in the footnotes?

Hopefully you understand what I am getting at here! But yes, the unofficial deputies are certainly an interesting topic. Thanks, JLo-Watson (talk) 21:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Update: Having just seen the Whitelaw infobox in its current form, it is how I suggested above i.e. without the predecessors/successors. I certainly support this being rolled out for the other unofficial/defacto deputies. However, I think it would be useful to put a hatnote or the like in the infobox for each of the defacto Deputy PMs - something with a concise but phrasing to what is on the DPM page - to explain the nature of their role.

Also, I noticed on the DPM page we list the official creation of the role in the infobox as 1995 with Heseltine. I think this could also have a hatnote/explainer as this could confuse some readers, for example, those who automatically assume Atlee was an official DPM!JLo-Watson (talk) 21:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you - that makes a lot of sense to me! It was actually me removed the predecessors and successors from Willie Whitelaw's infobox just a couple of hours ago and it was that which got me thinking about adding de facto Deputy Prime Minister to more infoboxes. Hatnotes explaining what a de facto Deputy Prime Minister is and what an official Deputy Prime Minister is an excellent idea and would definitely be necessary (perhaps we could use a similar statement on every article explaining the difference, with slightly different wording to explain which category the person in question falls into). I also think that, for Michael Heseltine, John Prescott and Nick Clegg, we should use predecessors and successors. As for the others, I might wane against it, but I don't really mind. Finally, when I was relatively new at Wikipedia last Autumn, I tried to (but lost the debate on) removing Deputy Prime Minister from Anthony Eden and Rab Butler's infoboxes. I have more sources/knowledge under my belt now and adding de facto is, I think, very different to removing these statements altogether, but I just wanted to make you aware! FollowTheTortoise (talk) 23:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Afghan prime ministers

Hello. Why were you removing the direct links to the Islamic State/Emirate section of Prime Minister of Afghanistan, in the post Democratic republic PM bios? GoodDay (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, surely readers can scroll to the appropriate section in the list themselves? Not sure why a “direct” link is necessary and it tends to be that we avoid that practice. We don’t do the same for the head of state of Afghanistan through the various forms of government it has had? JLo-Watson (talk) 01:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

If figured it would be better for readers to know what kinda country, each was a prime minister of. GoodDay (talk) 13:10, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

David Canzini

As you've worked quite a bit on Dominic Cummings, you might be interested in putting something together on David Canzini who was profiled this morning on BBC 4. It was pointed out that he had no Wikipedia page. There's some good background in the FT here. There's also an interesting piece in the Guardian.--Ipigott (talk) 11:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Liz Truss

Hello, a brief note that I strongly support your useful "stepped down" edit, which is being queried on Talk Billsmith60 (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi Bill @Billsmith60, thanks for this. I have left a comment on Truss' talk page explaining the rationale for this language choice. Best wishes JLo-Watson (talk) 23:29, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For your hard work on UK-politics related articles. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Tim! Best wishes :) JLo-Watson (talk) 21:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed GA nomination of Angela Merkel

Hi! I'd like to nominate Angela Merkel for consideration as a Good Article, and I'm reaching out to you as you are one of its most significant contributors. I have fixed some issues with that article, and I expanded it a little in some places, but I still feel that this is the right way to go per WP:GAN/I#N1.

Please let me know what you think of this. I'm also reaching out to some other top contributors, but one of them has been banned, and another one hasn't been active since 2018. Actualcpscm (talk) 20:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

I support your proposal to nominate Merkel's article for a GA. Best wishes JLo-Watson (talk) 13:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Daly (English politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Anderson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chairman of the Conservative Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Daly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)