User talk:JBlakeman96/sandbox

Latest comment: 2 years ago by JBlakeman96 in topic Contested deletion
WikiProject iconTechnology NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconSystems NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Massachusetts NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.
WikiProject iconInternet NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Contested deletion edit

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --JBlakeman96 (talk) 18:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

its only intention is to simply be a resource stating that this organization exists. All copy is written strictly as informational, with elements such as history and references from news articles. Being that Ockers is such a small company, resources are limited, which is why it is difficult to include sources. However, I don't believe that because a company is small, it should be diminished and ignored by Wikipedia. With being partners with the Red Sox, 98.5, and the New England Patriots, it's evident that Ockers is not looking for additional advertising, they only wish to be acknowledged as a company that exists. I am writing transparently as their marketing assistant. I even wrote to the editors begging for suggestions on how to change my article in order to abide guidelines. My only wish is to publish a general page of who we are just so people can understand what our company is. This article I have paid extremely close attention to the copy of and have tried to make the text only informational. I am extremely open to any criticism on how to go about writing a worthy article. As a growing company, it is imperative Ockers has presence on all major platforms. Wikipedia is designed to be an encyclopedia providing information on various topics and subjects. Ockers, much like Smart Technologies and Promethean, is a technology company who deserves to be on this platform, just like its competitors.