Incorrect information

edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Joseph Arujo. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Trezoo (talk) 12:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Arujo (February 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ishola0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musa Muhammed Olayinka (February 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 04:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musa Muhammed Olayinka (February 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Princess of Ara 20:05, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musa Muhammed Olayinka (March 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Red-tailed hawk was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:13, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Hello, Ishola0. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Musa Muhammed Olayinka, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musa Muhammed Olayinka

edit
 
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ishola0 (talk) 07:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Xavier Sanchez (March 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 15:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to User:Ishola0, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop falsely representing yourself on your user page. Also, this is patently untrue. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 17:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:Ishola0

edit

  User:Ishola0, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ishola0 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ishola0 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Fake barnstars and GA topicons on userpage. Thank you. –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:33, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Xavier Sanchez (March 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Red-tailed hawk was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Block notice

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyobons mots 18:48, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply