Hello, Jing-hai Huang, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Big Breasts and Wide Hips. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DThomsen8 (talk) 13:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Jianghan PlainEdit

Many thanks for this article! Always great to see editors working on China topics! One thing though can you please try to source it like I've now done. Read Wikipedia:Citing sources for some guidance. google books is a good place to look, and you can then paste urls into here to get full citations and save you the trouble.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:38, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
Great work adding categories and creating pages! --gdfusion (talk|contrib) 04:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Ludian CountyEdit

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your article, hope you can expand more counties!. It is polite to reply of course. Can you add films you start to List of Taiwanese films and the year lists of List of Hong Kong films. I suspect that the Taiwanese ones is very underdeveloped and should probably have a by year list like Hong Kong.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:26, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Ah but to decide "not important enough" is POV. The film lists are intended to be as comprehensive a list as possible of featured films made by country. not which films we liked and didn't!! Don't worry if it's not to your interest. Regards♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

WP:Tibet is a sub project of WP:China I believe, the task bar is the Chinese one. Don't want to get into political disputes over that one :-) You might enjoy my User:Dr. Blofeld/Great films. A work in progress, still a lot of world films to see but yeah overall I certainly know more than the average person! Lots of Chinese masterpieces I'm yet to see like the Horse Thief etc.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:34, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

National Famous Historical and Cultural CitiesEdit

Hi Hwangjinghai. What's the criteria for an article to be placed in this category? --NeilN talk to me 12:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Please rename the category to "National Famous Historical and Cultural Cities in China" or something similar. --NeilN talk to me 12:54, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Hwangjinghai! I also noticed the category that you just created Category:National_Famous_Historical_and_Cultural_Cities_in_China. But is this the official English title for this program? Or is this a translation done by you? Because the grammar of the category's title isn't too good in my opinion, such as the use of the word "Famous", which says little about this program (anything can be called famous nowadays). The word "famous" should probably be substituted with another word, maybe "renowned" or "eminent"? Or maybe just get rid of the "Famous" and name it "National Historical and Cultural Cities in China", which sounds much better.--Balthazarduju (talk) 01:07, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Beijing Daily DYK nomEdit

Regarding your nomination of Beijing Daily to be on DYK, it's good to go once you complete a quid pro quo review of someone else's nomination. Good job on the article, by the way! —innotata 00:48, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Well, it's kind of late to apologise, but sorry I had you do the QPQ review—I guess you only need to do that after you have five (I thought it was one) DYK credits. I'm not actually new to DYK, I used to be a really regular review, but that was before rules got changed, and I can't keep track of them. Anyway, the other editors should let you nominate 4 more articles without having to do a review, and I hope reviewing the other article wasn't too much trouble for you! —innotata 04:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Guo DongliEdit

Thanks for your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guo Dongli. If you have the time, could you formulate your comment into a vote, beginning with "Keep" or "Delete"? By the way, great work on Beijing Daily and other articles. Wikipedia's China coverage is quite poor, and your contribution is greatly appreciated! -Zanhe (talk) 03:47, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Beijing DailyEdit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Wuhan UniversityEdit

Hello Hwangjinghai. I have noticed that you have repeatedly removed the Chinese university ranking. I would like to ask you to refrain from doing so, for the following reasons:

  1. Substantively, both rankings are widely recognized in China. CUAA, known as "中国校友会网" in China, is a widely disseminated ranking of Chinese universities. It has over two million search results on Baidu. Same thing goes with the Wu Shulian ranking. The English Wikipedia has no such criteria to limit the sources to only the "world media" such as US News. Many subjects have only a local interest, and adding a local but verifiable source is totally fine.
  2. Procedurally, there are certain criteria to remove content on Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Notability is among one of them. Unfortunately for you, the rankings have met those criteria. If you have found the rankings are against any generally accepted standards, please list them as the reason(s) to remove them. Otherwise, it is at the very least not polite to remove legit and useful content added by other editors.

Therefore, I kindly ask you to stop removing that part on Wuhan University. Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any other question.--Howchou (talk) 12:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I don't think it is proper to exclude some content on the basis of "methodologies." I believe you must have noticed that there were no perfect rankings out there. US News rankings and QS rankings have their criticisms, see QS World University Rankings#General criticisms and U.S. News & World Report#Criticism of college rankings. Therefore, if you truly question the reliability of those college rankings, it would be fairer to remove all the rankings, but not remove only some of them on your own judgment.
I was using the rollback function and I apologize for accidentally removing some of your edits due to the design of this function. But again, I would sincerely hope you remove content on valid ground, as prescribed in the Wikipedian guidelines (Wikipedia:List of guidelines), but not your own judgment.--Howchou (talk) 14:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

对了,你是中国人吧。我们也可以用中文交流,在这里或者在中文维基。--Howchou (talk) 14:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

看你一会儿没上了,我先把话说在这儿,有一会儿不能上网了。维基百科要的不就是“可供查证”和“非原创研究”吗。这些大学排名不管你觉得有多荒谬,他们的影响是很难质疑的。根据“可供查证”的观点,所有内容都应该有来源,如果内容互相矛盾应该把双方观点公平展示出来,而不是删掉;编者对来源内容的真实性的个人看法不应该影响到添加这些内容本身。我知道大学排名是个荒谬的东西,但就是有很多人看;说到荒谬,把世界各地国情不同教学方式不同的大学放到一起排,不荒谬吗?US News公开声明他们考虑了声望的影响,可声望这种东西还算清晰吗?某个学校自己排,把自己排那么高的ARWU,还算中立吗?而且你如果觉得武书连的排名荒谬,校友会的你为什么也删?但我都没删,因为这些内容符合维基百科的收录标准;既然如此,最符合维基的做法应该是多列几个有影响的排名,供读者自己评判各个排名的准确度,有关各个排名的质疑在各个排名自己的维基页面里也有体现,就没有必要根据自己的看法去删减部分排名。我想你对“可靠性”也有些误解。维基里的可靠性不是指内容本身的可靠性,而是指的来源可靠。这里几个链接应当符合维基关于可靠来源的定义。请下次再进行此类编辑前三思,谢谢。--Howchou (talk) 15:56, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Okay, for anyone who's interested, here's a brief summary of what I said in Chinese: I was just reiterating the principles of Wikipedia, namely verifiability , no original research, and using reliable sources. The college rankings themselves did not violate any of the principles or any other standard per se, and the reasons you left on my user talk page probably were more of a personal preference than generally accepted standards for editing Wikipedia.

That being said, I do agree with you that it was likely unnecessary to add in all the rankings from previous years. I did not remove them because it was there before I started to edit Wikipedia. I will remove those old rankings.--Howchou (talk) 14:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

You are more than welcome to make any improvements. It was good to discuss with you.--Howchou (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Mu GuoguangEdit

Hwang, thank you for creating new articles. I would appreciate if you could improve your reference formatting. Please use this:

{{Citation | last= | first= | year= | title= |trans-title=| |language= publisher= | publication-place= | page= | url= |accessdate=}}

Last and first are last name and first name. Publication would be the name of the city, province and country. Accessdate is when you last visited the website, if a reference is online. If any are blank, you can leave them blank.
While there is no excuse for this, website constantly are killing links, even though there's no good reason to. So, it's a question of when, not if, those links will be dead links. Having all of this extra information will ensure that someone can find it once that happens.
Thank you, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Wrong ARWU Asian RanksEdit

Sorry but you miscounted the latest ARWU's Asian Ranks in the infoboxes on PKU, Tsinghua and SJTU pages:

Japan: 3 ahead 101-150 & 3 among 101-150;
Israel: 2 ahead 101-150 & 1 among 101-150;
China: 3 among 101-150;
Taiwan: 1 among 101-150;
Singapore: 1 among 101-150;
Korea: 1 among 101-150.

Thus, the above three top-ranked Chinese institutions should be among 6-15th within the continent instead of 4-12th as calculated by you. There're other regions in Asia apart from Japan & China. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 08:33, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Battle of HuangtiandangEdit

Hello! Your submission of Battle of Huangtiandang at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The article has already appeared on DYK. ch (talk) 03:20, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 22:08, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Shu HongbingEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for List of members of the Chinese Academy of SciencesEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

An award for you!Edit

  The Scientist's Barnstar
Much appreciate your work on scientists, particularly Chinese and the list of Academy members. Keep up the good work and may those red links soon all be articles! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, keep up the great work!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:20, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of HuangtiandangEdit

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Katherine Wei-SenderEdit

Thanks for creating the Kathie Wei biography (final 2014-08-17 version).

Do you recall reading that Wei attended Columbia University? I don't find it in the two general sources you provided. Nor readily find it clearly-elsewhere (as so many webpages are derived from EN.wiki).

Wei is not one of the Women Stars currently featured by WBF and not in the Top 10 ranks recently (Katherine Wei-Sender#External links). When I use the general search I am asked to login so I wonder whether you found that WBF biography as a registered WBF player yourself?

--P64 (talk) 01:59, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Qu QinyueEdit

Hi, interesting new username! Regarding the Qu Qinyue DYK, I suggest that you propose a new hook yourself. If I propose one, then by DYK rules a new reviewer will have to review it, which means further delay. Cheers, -Zanhe (talk) 07:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Qu QinyueEdit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Royal Society journals access through the Wikipedia LibraryEdit

Hello, Eakopskvm. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Category:National Famous Historical and Cultural Cities in ChinaEdit

Category:National Famous Historical and Cultural Cities in China, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:57, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

JSTOR cleanup driveEdit

Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!

Sent of behalf of Nikkimaria for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!Edit

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)