HighnessAtharva

Pokemon Adventures

Sorry I had to revert your edit on List of Pokémon Adventures volumes (1–20). See Wikipedia:Fancruft, more details would leave us with unneeded weight. Still, the summaries are in need of a copyedit. See List of Fullmetal Alchemist chapters or List of D.Gray-man chapters as examples. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Pokémon Adventures volumes (1–20), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mew, Tauros and Kadabra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of YAC Reader

The article YAC Reader has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 13:28, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of YAC Reader

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on YAC Reader, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 13:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from YAC Reader, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi HighnessAtharva,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Wardstone Chronicles, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. This is in regards to your recent addition of mass WP:FANCRUFT. Please read the linked essay, and take note of the relevance to your edits. Alex|The|Whovian^? 10:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Before editing the Wardstone Chronicles I visited the talk page of the article and saw that this was of mid-calss immportance/ start class importance. I thought that it was necessary to add at least some plot details about each single book from the Wardstone Chronicles. I did not expand it very much so there was no need to revert these changes. When readers come to this page, they should not only see the book list but also some brief plot about the book. Yes, my writing may seem like a fan work but you can help with it instead of reverting it. I can settle by erasing "The Wardstone Legend" if you want but im not giving up on book summary.Thanks! HighnessAtharva (talk) 12:39, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Are you also the IP that attempted to reinstate the edits? Alex|The|Whovian^? 12:43, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

I noticed but that IP address user was not me. I login while editing. I hope you don't revert my edits. Thanks! HighnessAtharva (talk) 12:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

So that I am not edit-warring, I will not be reverting. However, I strongly recommend that you self-revert your edits, allow the WP:STATUSQUO to stand per WP:BRD, and start a discussion on the talk page on why you believe the edits should remain, as the edits are obviously disputed content. You have been reverted by multiple editors, have failed to address another editor's revert of Over-written in-universe tone, undue weight, reads too much like fan site, restoring prior version. at [1], and have attempted to force your incorrectly-formatted content upon the article. I recommend taking notice of my words. Alex|The|Whovian^? 12:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi HighnessAtharva! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:43, Thursday, January 26, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HighnessAtharva, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

JesseRafe (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Clash-A-Rama

I've done some editing to clean up some grammar and spelling and make it look a little neater. However, I'd suggest you add some more reliable references (non-YouTube sources by a third-party to show notability). Best of luck! --Nerd1a4i (talk) 23:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Clash-A-Rama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clash-A-Rama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clash-A-Rama until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JesseRafe (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, HighnessAtharva. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clash-a-Rama (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clash-a-Rama and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades ^Godric 14:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello! HighnessAtharva, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winged Blades Godric 14:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Spooks Nightmare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spooks Nightmare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spooks Nightmare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Spooks Nightmare Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Spooks Nightmare Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:20, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Clash-a-Rama

Hello, HighnessAtharva. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clash-a-Rama".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 17:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HighnessAtharva. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your significant contributions over the years... Keep it up! Volten001 ☎ 09:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)