Hellocbgb/sandbox moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Hellocbgb/sandbox, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rover Girls (December 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your assistance.
The purpose of this page is to document the history of Rover Girls; although Rover Girls is referenced in the history of Lush, as yet the story of Rover Girls has not been printed. I was the band's manager and am documenting the as yet undocumented events. Hellocbgb (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Okay, understood.
However, based on what you say, you clearly have a conflict of interest (COI) regarding this topic. I will post a message below with instructions on how to handle this.
Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
As manager I merely booked a few gigs and booked the recording session mentioned in the article. This band was not a money making concern. The purpose of the article is to share a few facts about a band that may be of interest to historians of Lush and Silverfish. Hellocbgb (talk) 19:48, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
It doesn't matter that this wasn't a "money making concern". You could be writing about your uncle, and that would constitute a COI because you have an external relationship with the subject; money doesn't come into it. Just please trust me on this and formally disclose your COI, so you're not in (or even at risk of) violation of the policy. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Hellocbgb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Hellocbgb. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Rover Girls, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rover Girls (December 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
The reference is not fake. Hellocbgb (talk) 19:31, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Will someone please check this page again? Hellocbgb (talk) 07:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
No, nobody will "check this page" until you resubmit it for another review. Although if I'm honest, you needn't bother, because as it stands with only one source listed (and whether or not it's "fake", it certainly is pretty useless), it has no chance of being accepted.
Please read and understand the WP:GNG notability guideline, which a subject must meet before it can be included in the encyclopaedia. This requires significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources (such as newspapers, books, TV or radio programmes, etc.).
Please also see WP:REFB for advice on referencing.
And finally, please read and respond to the 'Managing a conflict of interest' section I posted earlier on this page. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rover Girls (February 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rover Girls

edit

  Hello, Hellocbgb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rover Girls, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rover Girls

edit
 

Hello, Hellocbgb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rover Girls".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply