HawkEggz

Welcome!

Hello, HawkEggz! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 01:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Paid editing

Hi @HawkEggz: Under Wikipedia Terms of Use any editor who is being paid to write or update an article, must confirm that they are a paid editor per WP:PAID and WP:DISCLOSURE. Any editor who is being paid and doesn't disclose risks indefinite blocking. scope_creep^Talk 10:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Scope creep: the disclosure was already made on my user page in Nov 2015. Is there an issue with that now? -- HawkEggz (talk) 06:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Sorry @HawkEggz: It is usually a paid silver template I was looking for. I never saw it. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 09:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

@Scope creep: by the way, are there issues with Apical Group? I've updated with third party citations after feedback from other contributors. Been trying to clean up the old PR language. Flagging it for deletion is a little over-the-top, no? Thanks! -- HawkEggz (talk) 09:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Apical Group for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apical Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apical Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 10:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

@scope_creep: What are the grounds for deletion specific to the page? There have been third party sources added. Thanks. -- HawkEggz.

I thought it was promotional, but it looks a solid keep. scope_creep^Talk 15:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Scope creep:, am trying to clean up the promotional language and provide factual content are backed by references, as you can see in the edits. So will a "solid keep" still warrant a flag for deletion? Thanks HawkEggz (talk) 01:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Scope creep:, looks like the "solid keep" got deleted. Any recourse? HawkEggz (talk) 04:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Edit Requests

Hi @HawkEggz: The content your adding seems to be designed to promote. These articles should offset discuss company events and processes that are notable, not fast post branding info off the wire that is promotional. I would suggest using Wikipedia:Edit requests to request an update to an article. It is standard way of doing it as the whole lot needs more scrutiny. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 02:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Paid Template

Hi @HawkEggz: There is a template called Template:Paid which is usually filled in by paid editors. Can you full it in please, so other editors can see that your paid, and bung it at the top of your user page. It used to drive the category system, process and WP software apparently. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 15:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Four tildes like ~~~~ will give you a signature. Best wishes. scope_creep^Talk 15:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Edit Requests

Hi @HawkEggz: No it will possibly be kept. Can you start using Wikipedia:Edit requests to request an update to an article. scope_creep^Talk 09:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Apical Group for deletion

Hi @HawkEggz: Not really. You can request a deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. scope_creep^Talk 07:28, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apical Group (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Apical Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Apical Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 07:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, HawkEggz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lapablo (talk) 07:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apical Group

Hello, HawkEggz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apical Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)