User talk:Graphium/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Graphium. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Re: Jyoti Mirdha
Message added 03:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Darren James (broadcaster)
Many thanks for your speedy review and OK of the article I created: Darren James (broadcaster). Much appreciated. I have now added a photograph of the subject, as suggested. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 09:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
That warning you placed on my talk page
Was that warning for me? Did you even read the hyperkalemia page history? A.amitkumar (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I have to apologise for that. I have reverted it as soon as I realised it. When I use Huggle, sometimes I tend to screw up. So, it just happened to be an edit conflict. When you pressed the "Revert" button on Twinkle, I also pressed the "Revert" button on Huggle. Then, not knowing that you reverted the edit, I just clicked a seperate "Warn" button and thought I was warning the vandal. Arctic Kangaroo 14:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- LOL. Twinkle has no "Revert" button. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 14:32, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yup, I know that. But as long as he can understand then it's fine. Arctic Kangaroo 14:35, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- LOL. Twinkle has no "Revert" button. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 14:32, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
Talkback
Message added 10:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Faizan -Let's talk! 10:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your stalking! You are really "a renowed talk page stalker"! Faizan -Let's talk! 10:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Submission
I got this article here. Thanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mike_Shanahan_(tight_end) 71.180.91.32 (talk) 18:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for being a vandal fighter.--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:36, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome, Emily. It's my pleasure to help Wikipedia. ;) Arctic Kangaroo 17:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Sandboxes
Hi, I notice you have been tagging a few user sandboxes for speedy deletion (as G1 nonsense, and G2 test pages). However, user sandboxes are supposed to be used as test pages, and it's fine for them to contain nonsense. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- OK, noted. Arctic Kangaroo 11:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
prodigal son
Hey, why was I flagged? Peoples talks on the talk page were all being deleted. I flagged it as vandalism and restored all of the delete comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samtomjon (talk • contribs) 11:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- That 208.x.x.x IP is a sock. By reverting User:MelbourneStar's edit, you are restoring the vandalism by the IP. Arctic Kangaroo 11:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't know about socks. He deleted a comment from it's appropriate place, probably due to a new user bouncing it around. I only notice because the guy kept saying "help, I'm new and just trying to talk". I think mstar might have gotten carried away and should have moved his comment to the section on the talk page that it was actually pertaining to, and then fix the formatting travesty. Which is what I tried to do. So it looks bad for newbs today.Samtomjon (talk) 11:51, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Tito Dutta (contact) 16:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble 06:38, 5 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Edit Request for "Vandalism"; Follow-up
I noted that there are two photos with the name Gate of all nations in Persepolis, one above the other. The one on the top shows the disfigured human faces of winged oxen on two sides of a gate. The picture underneath, which is the one you have probably noticed, shows two intact faces, which have probably led you to reject my request. Kindly check he matter and open the editing option for me!--Echopapa echoromeo (talk) 05:14, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
RfC:Infobox Road proposal
WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.
You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS
Yintan
That fuck has left again, I don't know why he speeds in making such decisions, everybody is editing here, there are other tasks too which can be done other than reverting vandalism, now he will not obey me, and it's your responsibility to get his consent. Faizan -Let's talk! 07:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not going to get back? Eh.....! Selling music. Faizan -Let's talk! 08:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm just curious. Selling music as in 1)Doing for leisure and earn money at the same time 2)His/Her business 3)Fame? Arctic Kangaroo 08:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not a problem, but for music, whatsoever he ought to stay here. Not for fame I think, but a real hurdle. Faizan -Let's talk! 08:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm just curious. Selling music as in 1)Doing for leisure and earn money at the same time 2)His/Her business 3)Fame? Arctic Kangaroo 08:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not solely about reverting vandalism. Never was. It's all about content creation. The purpose of this project is to write. So, write, will you. Btw, Kangaroo, the butterfly article in your sandbox is pretty neat. I took a peek, if you don't mind. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'll try to, but the thing is, I have little knowledge. I'm currently working on articles about Singapore butterflies. Of course, at anytime, feel free to peek at my sandbox.
PS-How do you get to know about the people in articles you contribute to? And how you know so much about them? Arctic Kangaroo 09:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- There is absolutely no need for you to have contextual knowledge on a subject. 99% of editors don't. Me included; I don't consider myself to be an expert on the things I write about. That's when Google comes in. Say, for example, my latest article, Kwek Hong Png. I had zero knowledge about this guy, except for the fact that I saw his sculpture at the Ancient Civilisations Museum. But hey presto, now I know a lot more. It's very simple, just google his name. For my case, I used Google books. I joined Wikipedia simply because I get to write about random things, and that's how you should go about too. :) As a side note, having contextual knowledge on a certain something might be worse. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- (I was pretty surprised that after a year or so here, you have only written one article.) ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I only became active in late November last year, and it's 2 articles so far, actually. Arctic Kangaroo 09:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- And also, I'm still thinking and see how I can improve the article about the Yellow Flat.
The "Doing" tag in my sandbox has not changed, and it's done on purpose. Arctic Kangaroo 09:50, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, so I noticed. Make it 200! It's possible... I created more than a hundred around last year. My advice: cite books. I might help you expand the stub soon. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- There is absolutely no need for you to have contextual knowledge on a subject. 99% of editors don't. Me included; I don't consider myself to be an expert on the things I write about. That's when Google comes in. Say, for example, my latest article, Kwek Hong Png. I had zero knowledge about this guy, except for the fact that I saw his sculpture at the Ancient Civilisations Museum. But hey presto, now I know a lot more. It's very simple, just google his name. For my case, I used Google books. I joined Wikipedia simply because I get to write about random things, and that's how you should go about too. :) As a side note, having contextual knowledge on a certain something might be worse. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'll try to, but the thing is, I have little knowledge. I'm currently working on articles about Singapore butterflies. Of course, at anytime, feel free to peek at my sandbox.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Rep
I've replied to your answer about that infobox at the teahouse pageZince34 (talk) 06:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Kelly Sutherland
I was about to reject 115.188.90.164 (talk · contribs)'s recent edits [1] to Kelly Sutherland – based on the rather critical tone that didn't seem to be supported by the cited sources, and the {{pp-pc1}} tagging specifically warning about NHL referees getting WP:BLP violations – when I saw that you accepted them. I've only done a few of these reviews, so I'd like your take on why this wasn't a BLP case. Thanks for any tips! ~ Jeff Q (talk) 09:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I found it quite OK, tone was still fine. But if I didn't remember wrongly (so I may be wrong), negative BLP info is fine as long as there's a reliable source. Cheers and feel free to guide me. Arctic Kangaroo 09:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I beg to differ. We cannot publish attack/non-neutral POV pages. However, this luckily isn't a very negative page, but I suggest someone remove the unduly-weighted phrase "heavily handed". ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 10:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I agree - improper inferences were being drawn from the sources and that's not OK.--ukexpat (talk) 16:38, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I beg to differ. We cannot publish attack/non-neutral POV pages. However, this luckily isn't a very negative page, but I suggest someone remove the unduly-weighted phrase "heavily handed". ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 10:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 10:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Message added 10:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Zince34' 10:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- More Messages!Zince34' 10:56, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Invite
You're invited to vote SpartacksCompatriot and Iwan Novirion as an administration in Minang Wikipedia at here and here as now no one admin on Minang Wikipedia. I hope you can help me.法尔汉 Aplikasi 17:01, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
steve fossen
Hi there, I've been trying to figure out what ref or citations are missing in my article. This musician has comparable information to Roger Fisher from the same band and he's got his page on Wiki. I've tried to rectify this article a few times and I'm not sure what you are refering to exactly that has not the right reference or citations. Please help me by stating which part is not approved Thank you very much for taking the time.
Sincerely, 18:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Mothetoed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mothetoed (talk • contribs)
- Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Regarding your article, more references are needed. It's great to see that you know how to display the references, so you just need to source the unreferenced paragraphs. Also, try not to add links to external websites in the main part of the article (the content). Cheers. Arctic Kangaroo 16:20, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey Kangaroo, thanks very much for your help ! I did add a few references yesterday and some of those are from external links. How do I go about avoiding these when they are the only known reference I have found? And also, I have youtube interviews and newspaper clippings/articles of my subject and his co-founder guitarist Roger Fisher who's got his article on Wikipedia. Could I referenced to those? I've read you can't. Again thank you very much for your help, as you can see I've been working on this article for a while (break for surgery) and would like to have it published one day soon. I know I'm not too far from that. Your time is appreciated on this. Mothetoed (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)MothetoedMothetoed (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 May 2013
- Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
- Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
- WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
Share the Cookies
|
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! |
| Hi Graphium/Archive 3, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 19:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC) |
Cookies?!
|
|
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! |
| Hi Graphium/Archive 3, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! Mediran (t • c) 00:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC) |
What Warning for 70.247.166.76
Hi, Arctic. IP 70.247.166.76 has continually added new statistics to various airport articles without providing a source. Here is where the problem is:
- This user started editing today, but has made several changes to numerous airport articles that are unconstructive. Was an IP vandal/disruptive editor welcome and a Level 1 OK? (See the IP's talk for more info). Thanks. World Traveller101 01:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Invite
You're invited to vote Naval Scene as an administration in Minang Wikipedia at here as now no one admin on Minang Wikipedia. I hope you can help me.法尔汉 Aplikasi 08:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the cookies
|
|
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! |
| Hi Graphium/Archive 3, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! Pratyya (Hello!) 15:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:44, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Invitation
Hi Arctic, you're invited to vote this article here. Cheers! 
— иz нίpнόp ʜᴇʟᴘ! 06:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Arc! This user has been making a lot of disruptive edits and has even been blocked for 24 hours. As you are an admin, I think it is better to permanantly block him as his IP has'nt been changing for a long while. I saw one blanking today by him when I was Patrolling so I warned him. But I feel it is not good to leave him like this. Zince34' 08:32, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) What? No way. Arc isn't an admin, however much he might behave like one. Thanks, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 08:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'll go to somebody else then. Zince34' 08:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- In future, you may want to report the vandals at WP:AIV after they have been warned appropriately. If you ever need any help with anything, you can approach User:Materialscientist. This guy's an admin who will usually be available the whole time, from about 11pm (UTC) to about 3pm (UTC), which should be quite an OK time for India. Cheers. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 15:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 May 2013
- News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
- WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
- Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map
- In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?
- Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases
Hello! :D
Thank you so much. I just need to learn my editing skills here. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yenwei (talk • contribs) 12:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Haha. Of course I am new here. :D Anyway, how long have you been editing in Wikipedia? Yenwei (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Haha, see my user page. ;) Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 13:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
you have inserted vandalism in 2013 formula on season article
After your edit there are statements about 1,7 (should be 1,6) litre turbocharged engines and that the present are 2,5 (should be 2,4) litres. Why that - you appear to have reverted edits that themselves were reverting of vandalism. Unlucky only that user that made those proper edits then went really vandalizing other pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.95.72.140 (talk) 14:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Fixed Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 14:07, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Unnecessary deletion of article for copyright infringement
Dear Arctic Kangaroo:
You recently deleted a page I'd submitted on Jean-Pierre Bardet for copyright infringement. The article in question used a lot of content from a university website THAT I WROTE! It's not copyright infringement when a writer uses his own work, and in this case, the work is content on a public university's website, certainly not anything for commercial use.
At this point, it doesn't matter because the page is no longer needed, but I think in the future it would be a good idea to contact the person who submitted the article before deleting it immediately. You seem to do that a lot, and since it's not viewable by anyone until it is approved, there really doesn't seem to be a reason not to allow the person to explain or correct the problem.
UTAcoe (talk) 21:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC) UTAcoe
- Arctic Kangaroo never deleted a page; only administrators can do it. He only ever marked pages for deletion, some of which later got deleted by an administrator. If you want to warn/notify anyone about wrongly deleting a page, you should do so with the deleting administrator. Just go to the page that got deleted and in the deletion log that appears in red, go to the talkpage of the administrator who deleted the page and leave this message there instead. Note that even though content is not actually copyrighted, it does seem so when placed on a site with a footer saying "All Rights Reserved" or something similar. I noticed that the webpage content was copy-pated from ([2]) suggests that the website claims copyright for any content available on it. Also note that copy-pasting, regardless of whether it causes copyright infringement or not, is not preferred for Wikipedia articles in general. Please see WP:C-P. smtchahal(talk) 01:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Update
Hi, Arctic Kangaroo. A few thing of update:
- 1. I see you got a new signature, which I very much like
. Good thinking there. - 2. I'm also going on a semi-wikibreak for similar reasons, except for nl.wikipedia.org (Dutch Wikipedia). I want to increase my edit count there.
- 1. I see you got a new signature, which I very much like
Anyway, good luck on everything. Sincerely, WorldTraveller101(Trouble?/My Work) 22:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cam'ron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tonight (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Note: That's one confused bot. I was just fixing the link while reviewing an edit on a PC1 page. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 14:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)