Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaurav Tiwari (May 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Gaurav8D pixer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit
Hello, Gaurav8D pixer, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Gaurav8D pixer, good luck, and have fun. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaurav Tiwari (June 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: hoax
Theroadislong (talk) 08:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gaurav Tiwari

edit
 

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Gaurav Tiwari. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 08:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am not promoting hoax please review my page Gaurav8D pixer (talk) 09:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Gaurav Tiwari—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:331dot. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for this Done by Mistake. Gaurav8D pixer (talk) 09:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gaurav8D pixer

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:Gaurav8D pixer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

direct copy of User:331dot page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 09:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine/members, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 10:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

false details on your user page

edit

Copying and pasting someone-else's admin details on your user page is not a good idea. Theroadislong (talk) 10:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Then What can I do Gaurav8D pixer (talk) 10:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please unblock me Gaurav8D pixer (talk) 10:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaurav8D pixer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:26, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What I do you blocked me please let me unblock please.

You may make another unblock request, but I think that you lack the skills and maturity needed to participate here. 331dot (talk) 15:12, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply