Gaelicbow

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Murrough O'Brien, 1st Earl of Inchiquin

Dear Gaelicbow. We seem to share an interest in irish history. You might be my teacher as I am new to the subject and am a foreigner living in Ireland without any knowledge of the Irish language. Thank you very much for your intervention on the article Murrough O'Brien, 1st Earl of Inchiquin, which still needs a lot of work. I admired your clever maintenance tag {{Failed verification}} and I hope that you will accept the citation from the ODNB article that I threw in as a replacement for the bad one from O'Hart.

On the other hand your change from "Murrough visited Charles I at Oxford" to "Murrough was courted by Charles I at Oxford" does not sound convincing to me. In addition it would of course need a citation.

Why did you delete the statement that said he became a Catholic in 1656? It is perhaps a bit surprising but it is a well-known fact that he did convert towards the end of his life in France. This would of course merit a citation. You could have added a {{Citation needed}} there.

May I tell you that I regret the cropped ID-photo-like face of Inchiquin in the infobox that you threw away and replaced with the full portrait that appeared further down. What made you do this? Is there something in one of the guidelines about this? With best regards and hope of a good collaboration on Irish history with you, Johannes Schade (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Redmond Gallagher

Hello Gaelicbow! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Redmond Gallagher, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.dib.ie/index.php/biography/gallagher-redmond-a9434, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Redmond Gallagher and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Redmond Gallagher, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Redmond Gallagher. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Redmond Gallagher with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Redmond Gallagher saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 23:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Apologies, this indeed needs to be addressed. Many Thanks, Gaelicbow (talk) 15:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Kolven, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Graham87 14:39, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Old English or Hiberno-Norman?

Dear Gaelicbow, thanks for raising the question of how the Catholic Irish families of Norman origin should be called. You replaced "Old English" with "Hiberno-Norman" in the article Antoine Hamilton. Generalising this in AWB would give several 1000 edits. The term Hiberno-Norman might be more correct but is unpopular. Running a Google Ngram shows "Old English" to be about 3 times more frequent than "Hiberno-Norman". This should perhaps be discussed at WP:Wikiproject Ireland with people like (haphazardly naming some) User:Laurel Lodged, User:Fergananim, User:Mabuska, User:Scolaire. With best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 08:45, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Definitely worthy of discussion. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Of course I'm open to the view that 'Old English' is more applicable per being more common; feel free to revert my edit on Hamilton if it caused minor contention. I made the bold decision to remove it as a controversial and likely anachronistic term. Let's discuss it further on Hamilton's and or Normans in Ireland talk page. Gaelicbow (talk) 09:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

'Old English' would be the more common, however it really only came into being as far as I'm aware after the arrival of 'New English' from the late Tudor and the Stuart periods. In light of that Hiberno-Norman might be a better term for the earlier period, but if sources primarily use 'Old English', or simply 'English', we should go with the weight of evidence. Mabuska ^(talk) 19:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

County Londonderry

Please refrain from altering references to County Londonderry to read County Derry. As per WP:DERRY the name of County Londonderry is to be used on Wikipedia. Also please note that, unlike the city naming, the name of County Derry is a purely colloquial name and not a historical name. If you read up on the history of County Londonderry you will see it was created from County Coleraine and there was not a historical County Derry previously that was renamed to Londonderry. Additionally do not try to obfuscate it with different appearances such as you did on Keane (surname). Canterbury Tail talk 12:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Again, please refrain from altering County Londonderry to read County Derry. As previously explained, and referenced, there was no County Derry prior to County Londonderry. Such edits are considered disruptive on Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 21:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Salusbury-Trelawny baronets a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of references

Please do not delete references from articles as you did here in the McCartney (surname) article. Thanks. —  AjaxSmack  14:48, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Anglicisation of Irish writer

Hi, sorry for an abrupt reversion, but I'm bewildered by your impulse to turn Cathal Ó Searcaigh English! He's a writer mainly - almost entirely - in Irish and living in an Irish-speaking area. He's generally known as Cathal Ó Searcaigh, not Charles Sharkey, and the nearest town is officially Gort a' Choirce. He may have Charles Sharkey on his birth certificate, but then Irish names used often to be anglicised by the Registrar in past times and his parents presumably passively accepted that. I think it's misleading to give him an English name which does not match how he's generally known; it smacks of the "Jams O'Donnell" episode in An Béal Bocht! And to rub it in, it's even put in bold type! So please, let Cathal retain his name and his culture, the latter being under enough pressure already. Dmhball~enwiki (talk) 13:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

I take your points and won't contest the revert. But two things: Gortahork is the article title so we should link as such (this is English Wikipedia, not Irish Wikipedia, fi, we wouldn't say a German speaker/someone from Germany was born in 'Deutschland'). Secondly, for those who cannot speak Gaelic, reference to Gort an Choirce and Cathal Ó Searcaigh (without any note of anglicization/birthname) is going to confuse readers unfamiliar with the subject.

Also, note that the personal life / controversy surrounding Ó Searcaigh has nothing to do with this. This is simply a case of following MOS.

Bíodh lá maith agat, Gaelicbow (talk) 13:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for that very reasonable reply! OK I'll concede the Gortahork point and when changing it I'll maybe include the Irish version in brackets. And by the way it hadn't even occurred to me that this could be anything to do with the controversy, now still an issue but fading gradually into historic time.

Le dea-mhéin, Dmhball~enwiki (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Gaelicbow. Thank you for your work on Sir John Mosley, 1st Baronet. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Anglo-Irish

I noticed that you changed a few people from being Irish to being Anglo-Irish. Unfortunately without any evidence. Could you provide sources for that in all the articles where you changed that? The Banner talk 00:10, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Seriously? They do not need sources when they are self-evident in the content of the article (and the articles of their respective forbears). Do you have any knowledge of Irish history, or know the distinction between ‘Anglo-Irish’ and ‘Irish’? RV the pages if you want (I may contest it) but don’t pester my TP with such nonsense. Gaelicbow (talk) 08:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes, we need sources for that. Conform WP:V. The Banner talk 09:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Viscount Ashbrook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King George II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Help with footnote-as-ref on Gray (surname)

Hello Gaelicbow! (And may I say, nice username! I live with a roommate who's almost 100% ethnically derived from Irish bloodlines, and have gained an even greater appreciation for Irish and Gaelic history as a result!)

I'm a bit of a gnome-ish editor, still getting the hang of bigger areas on en.wiki like reference formatting. I find it comforting to copyedit and double-check changes in tagging, so I came across your recent removal of the "references needed" tag on the page for Gray (surname). I initially reverted your tag removal, but then rightly second-guessed myself and went to look up the status of "Footnotes" in policy. I had misunderstood Footnotes to function more like they do in the publishing world, and now I understand they can serve effectively as references, so I reverted my reversion of your tag removal.

What I was wondering, if you have time to share, is whether or not it would be appropriate to explicitly link the footnote to the introductory sentence of that article, which I believe it's intended to serve as a source for? I also assume that that sole introductory sentence is what the "reference needed" tag had (edit: been) intended for. If you think it's fine as is, please say so, but my instinct was to try to link a direct clickable footnote # at the end of the sentence so readers can immediately see the corresponding footnote.

If you don't have time for this, no worries- I might mosey on over to the Teahouse for a better understanding of references vs footnotes if I don't hear from you this week. I feel a little silly, because even after 15 years as an en.wiki reader and maybe 2 cumulative years of IP editing and then this formal account, I completely missed footnotes being usable as references! There's a lot to get the hang of on this truly impressive, sometimes intimidating, website.

Thanks for your edits, and your edit summaries which made it easy to track what you were doing on that page (even though I still misunderstood it at first, lol). Cheers! Chiselinccc (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)