User talk:GRALISTAIR/Archive 2022

Moved article

Hi. I moved your article to here: Draft:Felixstowe to Nuneaton (F2N) railway upgrade. -Lopifalko (talk) 23:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transpennine Route Upgrade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victorian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Felixstowe–Nuneaton railway upgrade has been accepted

Felixstowe–Nuneaton railway upgrade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lopifalko (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Epoxy value has been accepted

Epoxy value, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Northwest or North West?

Hi — I'm about to accept your Draft:Northwest England Electrification schemes, and just wanted to ask whether the 'Northwest' in the title refers to the UK gov't region of North West England, or to some other definition thereof? I need to decide what article name to give this when published ('North West' or 'Northwest'?), and whether to add a link to the North West England article.

Also, a related minor point: I assume there's no need to capitalise 'electrification'; it's just a common noun, right?

Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Great catch. I was going to say it does not matter. I live in Northwest Georgia- Dalton to be precise and so have used American English etc. Googling that for anything to do with the UK gives North West. So since the article is about the UK I suggest you are correct and page should be moved to North West. Also, electrification is a noun so no capitals for a British English article is perfectly fine GRALISTAIR (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: North West England electrification schemes has been accepted

North West England electrification schemes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, GRALISTAIR

Thank you for creating Poly(propylene glycol) diglycidyl ether.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

"O-Cresyl glycidyl ether (o-CGE)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect O-Cresyl glycidyl ether (o-CGE) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 11#O-Cresyl glycidyl ether (o-CGE) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DMacks (talk) 06:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Castor oil glycidyl ether, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Composite.

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Kirkham Grammar School ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 02:58, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Aniline diglycidyl ether moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aniline diglycidyl ether, is not suitable as written to remain published. It is incomplete and also needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:58, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aniline diglycidyl ether has been accepted

Aniline diglycidyl ether, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:37, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi GRALISTAIR! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:50, Wednesday, September 21, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Copyright problem: Corrosion engineering

Hello GRALISTAIR! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Corrosion engineering, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://dokumen.pub/practical-power-plant-engineering-a-guide-for-early-career-engineers-9781119534983-1119534984-9781119534990-1119534992-9781119535003-111953500x-9781119534945.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Corrosion engineering and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Corrosion engineering, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Corrosion engineering. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Corrosion engineering with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Corrosion engineering saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! BalinKingOfMoria (talk) 00:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Crow Nest Junction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crow Nest Junction, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crow Nest Junction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, GRALISTAIR. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weaver Junction

I'd be surprised to see it close in delete, and think you would have a good case at Deletion Review if it were. Garuda3 (talk) 16:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Let's not prejudge the closer, but as Garuda3 writes, the forum to complain about out-of-policy deletions is WP:Deletion review. I'd suggest in the meantime disengaging from the AfD. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 23:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Good advice. I have done so now for about 2 days GRALISTAIR (talk) 23:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Redaction

Hi, as you may have noticed, I redacted and suppressed the address you posted at UKRAIL. It's rarely a good idea to post your home address publicly, as it can open you up to harassment; however, as an experienced editor you likely understand the consequences, so if you want me to make the revisions visible again I will do so. I meant to leave this note when it happened, apologies. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I appreciate it. I am happy for you to leave it redacted GRALISTAIR (talk) 15:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, I will do so. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)