User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 33

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugh R. Adair

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 11:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fred Hornby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fred Hornby, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 12:10, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koninklijke Militaire School (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Koninklijke Militaire School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Koninklijke Militaire School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Opperman (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank Opperman (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucius Brooks (May 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This was already rejected by a fellow editor. You skirted our policy and resubmitted it anyways and then after it was decline you resubmitted it again with no improvements of substance. If this is submitted again without a major overhaul it'll need to be taken to MfD.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Prosch

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 23:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean A. Turnage

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chhanamukhi (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LittlePuppers was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chhanamukhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chhanamukhi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LittlePuppers (talk) 00:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosa Rosanova has been accepted

Rosa Rosanova, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MapleSoy (talk) 06:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Effie Conley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Effie Conley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 07:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hugh Fay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hugh Fay, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 07:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matelea floridana has been accepted

Matelea floridana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Heart of Texas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Heart of Texas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 08:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Robert Daly has been accepted

William Robert Daly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Martin (South Carolina) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Martin (South Carolina). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:56, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Martin (South Carolina) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Martin (South Carolina). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Solomon Dill has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Solomon Dill. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Comment About Stubs

Two of your stubs were showing up in Category:Pending AfC submissions less than 450 bytes long, but were not submitted. I have commented to User:Primefac, who may be the originator of the category, that unsubmitted drafts should not show up in the category, because the purpose of the category should be to contain drafts that may be problematic. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solomon Dill (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Solomon Dill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Solomon Dill, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Fabriel Myers (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William Fabriel Myers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:William Fabriel Myers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Allison Kolb has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Allison Kolb. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 22:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perry G. Wall II

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

1292simon (talk) 01:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:James Vick concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:James Vick, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Vick (publisher) has been accepted

James Vick (publisher), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hugo K. Graf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hugo K. Graf, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 04:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Hitchcock (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walter Hitchcock and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Walter Hitchcock, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matthew Salleh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matthew Salleh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Flanagan (actor) (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward Flanagan (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edward Flanagan (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugh Fay (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hugh Fay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hugh Fay, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:55, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucius Wimbush (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucius Wimbush and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucius Wimbush, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Crews (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Crews and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph Crews, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Opperman (actor) (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Opperman (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank Opperman (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Kroth Moser (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles Kroth Moser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charles Kroth Moser, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred Hornby (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fred Hornby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fred Hornby, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ferdinand Gaynair has been accepted

Ferdinand Gaynair, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudolf Markgraf has been accepted

Rudolf Markgraf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 08:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank La Roche and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank La Roche, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lenny Mendonca and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lenny Mendonca, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 10:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solomon Dill has been accepted

Solomon Dill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 18:32, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

state senator

I've accepted one of your drafts per WP:NPOL. I also read your thread at Jimbo's talk. I don't there's any racism involved, including just a bit more detail would have made things way more easier. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 17:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

PS: it was Lucius Wimbush. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 17:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks User:TryKid. Yes, the state senators and reps will be accepted eventually. They're notability is indisputable per guidelines. I'd like to see them all added and of course would love to see them expanded. It should be noted many had short political careers and lost their lives soon after being elected. So there isn't always a lot to say about them. Freed from slavery. Elected years later during reconstruction. Murdered by the KKK. Background info and good documentation on slaves isn't easy to come by but at least if they're included those with enough interest to delve in can always work on them. Thanks again. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vince Proby has been accepted

Vince Proby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks User:Theroadislong. I was planning to see if I can work up an entry on the librsry he designed. Or at least merge some bits into the library system and community entries. Some interesting history and artwork involved. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Osaka Prefectural Otemae High School (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Osaka Prefectural Otemae High School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Osaka Prefectural Otemae High School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Founded in 1886? 10 or so notable alumni already listed. Another high school spun off from it. The sourcing could be better but I don't see any case for it not meeting notability criteria User:KylieTastic. You don't think it would survive a deletion discussion? FloridaArmy (talk) 19:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

• Sorry but I'm not sure what being founded in 1886 is too notability? I went to a school formally founded in 1890s with it's original roots from 1630 but it's not notable. The "notable alumni" is unsourced, and most of the targeted articles do not even mention (I did only search for "Otemae") so it's unclear where it even came from as not from the 1 page source? Even then notability is not inherited... so without indication that the school was a key part in the alumni lives not sure how it helps. Where did the information come from as much that is written is not in the 1 page source. So no in it's current state I don't think as a secondary school it would survive AfD. My Japanese is basic so finding extra sources is beyond me. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 19:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FloridaArmy

Thank you for creating James Vick (publisher).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jana Lund (June 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Clarityfiend was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Fails WP:NACTOR, with only a handful of credits in obscure movies and no significant TV appearances. This list of minor press coverage shows nothing that supports her satisfying WP:BIO.

Clarityfiend (talk) 08:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clarence Brooks (actor) has been accepted

Clarence Brooks (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Goldsztajn (talk) 09:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Just an additional comment - I did some clean up and linking. I quite enjoyed reading about him in the sources and thanks for creating this.--Goldsztajn (talk) 10:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your help User:Goldsztajn! Please let me know if I can ever be of any assistance. I agree he's an interesting figure. Hopefully our coverage of him will continue to expand. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:04, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew S. Bishop (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew S. Bishop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrew S. Bishop, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 08:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Passes Entertainer criteria for having starring roles in notable films. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert John Palmer (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lefcentreright was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert John Palmer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert John Palmer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 19:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Beverly Nash has been accepted

William Beverly Nash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 21:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

• I had him on my list to write but ya beat me - but damn reading some of the papers from the time is damn depressing. Although I guess in many ways things have still sadly not got much better, just a chnage in language. KylieTastic (talk) 21:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Yes, it's very sad. Several more to do from the list of "Radicals" in the photo link. Also from Randolph Cemetery. I'm happy to help and have someone else start them. I have a tough time getting articles approved and the AfC process is unpleasant and exhausting for me.

I appreciate your good works and considerate communications User:KylieTastic. Keep up the great work and enjoy life. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:07, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henderson Middle School (DeKalb County, Georgia) (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henderson Middle School (DeKalb County, Georgia) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Henderson Middle School (DeKalb County, Georgia), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough. I think decades old high schools turned middle schools with notable alums should be included. Maybe I can merge it somewhere. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Surreal Barnstar
		For starting this discussion on Jimbo's talk page. Though intentions have rightly been questioned, and veracity's also in doubt, it has led to some fine new discussions, that we just wouldn't have had without. 71.234.210.113 (talk) 05:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Henderson Middle School (DeKalb County, Georgia) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Henderson Middle School (DeKalb County, Georgia). Thanks! John from Idegon (talk) 09:39, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Myxter (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ahecht was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lee Myxter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lee Myxter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 12:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Myxter has been accepted

Lee Myxter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

——Serial ^# 16:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Incidents#FloridaArmy_and_AfC_woes. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

I have responded there. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lee Myxter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Myxter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Myxter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks User:Hasteur. Clearly I am at fault for creating an entry on a politician who held statewide office thus meeting our inclusion criteria, having it rejected at AfC, pointing out that the rejection was improper, having an experienced editor accept it when they recognized the problem, and then having you drag it to AfD where it will be snow kept. When will my causing of disruptions end????? FloridaArmy (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Hayes (musician) (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Hayes (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Henry Hayes (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 22:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert W. Hale (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Albert W. Hale and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Albert W. Hale, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 22:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zyllah Inez Shannon (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MapleSoy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zyllah Inez Shannon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Zyllah Inez Shannon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 05:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1873 National Civil Rights Convention has been accepted

1873 National Civil Rights Convention, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roy Willard Rawlings has been accepted

Roy Willard Rawlings, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Fabriel Myers has been accepted

William Fabriel Myers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Colored Conventions Movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Antebellum

Hungerford Vocational High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Eatonville

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Fixed. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

User talk:Jimbo Wales

I've removed the last comment you made there as it was over the line in terms of a personal attack. However angry you might be, there is really no point throwing about aspertions of racism, bigotry and lying; the only thing that'll happen is you'll end up getting blocked, and no-one gains from that. Black Kite (talk) 11:18, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Liars and bigots do not belong on Wikipedia. I'm tied of being attacked for adding articles about subjects related to African Americans, Jamaicans, and Africans. User:JzG repeatedly lies about my work and said it's somehow up to me to make editors care about these subjects. That is over the line for me. His behavior and that of the others attacking me with dishonest and abusive misrepresentations is unacceptable. Guy's abusive behavior cannot be allowed to continue. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Regardless of what you think about him, if you are going to accuse people of bigotry or lying on a high-traffic Wikipedia page, you'll need actual evidence, not vague assertions. Black Kite (talk) 11:27, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

User:JzG accused me of creating lots of one line directory stubs and of not working on my article creations once they are in mainspace. Both are easily disproval lies.

I am tired of being attacked for my article work on underrepresented subjects. I understand African Americans aren't popular, liked, or interesting to some people. But bigotry is wrong. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

FloridaArmy, you're calling me a bigot? Exactly that, right? I just want to be absolutely clear here. Guy (help!) 11:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

No User:JzG. I only pointed out that you attack me, lie about my work, and that you and others have made a big issue of my article creations on subjects related to African Americans, Jamaicans, and Africans.

My statement about liars and bigots not belonging on Wikipedia is a general statement. I'm sure you agree with it. It's unfortunate it even needs to be said. But here we are. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

FloridaArmy, I have blocked many bigots. I agree they don't belong here.

Now, about your issues. If you just write enough of an article that the case for notability is explicit, the AfC reviewers will stop complaining about you, and in fact the AfC restriction will probably be lifted. So please just try that, eh? Guy (help!) 11:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm glad we see to eye to eye on bigots and bigotry. You left out liars, but that's also an odious and unwelcome practice.

I would love to write volumes on African American Reconstruction Era politicians. Unfortunately I am a feeble editor and great sourcing is not always readily available. Thankfully, Wikipedia is a collaborative enterprise and many wonderful fellow editors have done a terrific job assisting. The first step is to get these important and interesting subjects included on Wikipedia, and I know I can count on you for assistance in this endeavor going forward. I don't think anything else needs to be said. I'm going to get back to writing up African American legislators many of whom were murdered by well meaning Democrats who were very concerned about upholding their quality standards. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

FloridaArmy, you appear to define "liar" as "person whose analysis does not agree with mine" - a regrettably common problem.

The first step is indeed to get the articles included. The way yo do that is to establish why we should care about the subject. If you don't have the skills or resources for that, then AfC is no better than dropping half-formed articles into mainspace.

Maybe use your WikiProject to work on the drafts before submission. But the drama is not going to go away as long as you think that your articles are so self-evidently important that you don't have to bear the burden of demonstrating it to other editors. Guy (help!) 12:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

• I thought we established that it's not my job to make anyone care about African American and other African diaspora related subjects. If they meet our notability criteria they belong in articlespace.
• Anyone who says I produce lots of one line directory stubs or that I don't work on my article creations after they are in mainspace −is a liar.
• The drama is not going to end until we find a cure for bigotry. Unfortunately, that is well beyond me and my capabilities. I can't even cure Covid. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert John Palmer has been accepted

Robert John Palmer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 09:15, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

• I failed to find any obituary for the full DOD or more bio details - I can't believe a state representative would not have one! Maybe now in main space someone else can find some more. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 09:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Yes, well, it should be noted this draft was denied with a comment asking for more informstion such as the exact date of death. This is an example of the frustrating and exhausting part of working on underrepresented subjects. The sourcing and information isn't always easy to come by. But an African American state level politician belongs in mainspace regardless.

For what it's worth, which may not be much as I assume it's not a reliable source, this geneology website lists him as Sr., identifies 3 wives, and lists his children and step children. Could be useful for searching anywway. FloridaArmy (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Is this family operating funeral parlors descended? FloridaArmy (talk) 10:04, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

This post about a "Reconstruction Network" has a paragraph about Palmer and William Beverly Nash. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:59, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

I did see the comment about the DOD, but I'm not sure if that was actually tied to the reviewers decline - I hope not as that would be random and non-relevant. I would say that as you don't ping/mention people in some replies that the reviewer probably never saw your reply. In this case I can see this was only 1 of 11 reviews in the previous month so they probably didnt unless they watchlist. Personally I only watchlist articles I think I can get accepted. I had seen the geni.com source before but yes the script I use colors it red as "generally unreliable" from WP:RSPSOURCES so I avoid. I have seen editors in mainspace strip all "un-reliable" sources then AfD so I avoid any links marked red - but sometimes they do help track down good sources. The palmermemorialchapel.com could be descended but it's so damn difficult to tell without access to births and marriage certificates. One thing I found trawling though newspapers is there are way too many people with the same names. For now I think I'll work on the other Randolph Cemetery notables and see if we can get that list all blue, and then maybe come back to this one. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Simeon Farr has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Simeon Farr. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Simeon Farr

I attempted to accept this but the accept button isn't functioning, can't fathom why? Theroadislong (talk) 20:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks User:Theroadislong. I would joke that even the AfC software on Wikipedia is racist, but I don't want to get blocked into oblivion. I'm sure it will get sorted out. Theroadislong but as long as we get to the right place. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Ha haa yeah, I've asked for help with the problem, see what they come up with. Cheers. Theroadislong (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

• User:Theroadislong I've had that before - I think if the software thinks the time is in the past it does not work, so I've come to think its a clock sync issue (or the AFC submission has no ts (timestamp) field at all) normally just wait a while and it works. Try again it look ok for me now. KylieTastic (talk) 20:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

No it's still not working for me. Theroadislong (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simeon Farr has been accepted

Simeon Farr, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 20:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kangaroo Records has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kangaroo Records. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 02:13, 4 June 2020 (UTC)